TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Bonterra CyberGrants vs. Foundant Grant Lifecycle Manager vs. VSTracking

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Bonterra CyberGrants

    Score8 out of 10
    N/ABonterra CyberGrants is a single-platform grants management solution that emoves grantmaking complexities for better alignment with the corporate mission. Used to streamline, simplify, and automate the grantmaking process for grantmakers and grantseekers alike. Its flexible workflow engine boosts efficiency, data-driven decision making, and alignment between the corporate mission and philanthropy efforts. CyberGrants allows users to analyze grants, employee giving, and…N/A

    Foundant Grant Lifecycle Manager

    Score6 out of 10
    N/AWith Foundant GLM, users can create, launch and receive online applications and grant reports, manage online proposal reviews, and manage grants and information from a single, integrated solution from anywhere they have internet access.N/A

    VSTracking

    N/AN/AN/AN/A
    Pricing
    Bonterra CyberGrantsFoundant Grant Lifecycle ManagerVSTracking
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Bonterra CyberGrantsFoundant Grant Lifecycle ManagerVSTracking
    Free Trial
    NoNoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details———
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    Bonterra CyberGrantsFoundant Grant Lifecycle ManagerVSTracking
    Small Businesses
    Blackbaud Grantmaking
    Score9 out of 10
    Blackbaud Grantmaking
    Score9 out of 10
    Blackbaud Grantmaking
    Score9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Submittable
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Submittable
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Submittable
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Bonterra CyberGrantsFoundant Grant Lifecycle ManagerVSTracking
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    3.0
    (13 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Bonterra CyberGrantsFoundant Grant Lifecycle ManagerVSTracking
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Bonterra
    CyberGrants is very adaptable, so it's ideal for any team that has a large number of grants to review, especially teams with multiple grant applications running on different timetables. Their employee engagement features, while not something we've used, are an area we'd love to explore further, because they create an overall snapshot of giving to an organization (tying in-kind support from volunteerism, etc. in with gift matching contributions and grant applications). If you only receive a few grant applications, or a lot of your grant applicants are very hesitant to use computers or online applications, it might not be as worth it for you.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Foundant Technologies
    From where I stand, GLM is well-suited for use by small-staffed charitable foundations who make more than thirty (30) grants a year and distribute more than $500,000 in funds to non-profits. The software is able to handle every step in the grant-making process from receipt of a request, to the evaluation and decision regarding the grant, to tracking the pay-out, and to closing the grant when the work or the year is completed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    VSTracking
    No answers on this topic
    Pros
    Bonterra
    • Custom grant applications - it was easy for us to create applications that asked exactly the right questions. Features like downloadable budget templates were perfect for us, too.
    • Easy review process - we're able to see the status of any grant's review process in just a few clicks.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Foundant Technologies
    • Foundant provides a streamlined grants management solution for reasonable cost.
    • The company listens to its users, collecting ideas and making improvements. Updates to the software are rolled out several times a year. When something cannot be changed right away, the company gives context and forecasts when the change might be possible.
    • While the software is easy to use, it also offers more advanced features (such as merge templates) that allow more customization for the advanced user.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    VSTracking
    No answers on this topic
    Cons
    Bonterra
    • Help guides on the admin page aren't always the most helpful for the specific questions I've had.
    • Reporting is almost TOO comprehensive - it can be a little overwhelming at first!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Foundant Technologies
    • Need a smother process for third party responses. Currently individuals recommending more than one student for scholarships have many emails to deal with to find the correct link to upload the correct student's letter.
    • Questions that would filter which applications the applicant would apply for.
    Read full review
    VSTracking
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Bonterra
    No answers on this topic
    Foundant Technologies
    I have not used other online grantmaking products or evaluated others. I used to use MicroEdge Gifts, but not the online application version. It was a stand alone management system. This is hands-down better, easier to use and a more complete system
    Read full review
    VSTracking
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Bonterra
    • The time saved on administrative work is a huge win. We used a simple web form for our applications, and spent a lot of time and energy manually entering details into our old system.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Foundant Technologies
    • Positive customer service--fairly easy to use for applicants.
    • Positive--easy to run reports you have already set up, so [it] saves time.
    • Negative--limited question types makes it harder to gather the data we want to track.
    • Negative--our budget is more complex than can be tracked in Foundant, so we have to use a separate program.
    • Negative--we have to track potential grantee conversations in a separate program.
    • Negative--getting data ready to display in a dashboard takes a lot of time to manipulate in Excel.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    VSTracking
    No answers on this topic
    ScreenShots

    Bonterra CyberGrants Screenshots

    Screenshot of pre-qualification questionnaires and automated routing and approval workflows, to make it easy for eligible grant applicants to submit proposals.Screenshot of where grant allocations can be closely tracked against corresponding budget line items, ensuring they stay within set budget limitations.Screenshot of enriched reporting and data visualization capabilities, to bring philanthropic impact stories to life.