Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Broadcom Application Delivery Analysis
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
Broadcom Application Delivery Analysis is an application performance management tool designed to prove how well a network delivers applications to users with application delivery analysis of performance and availability of SLA measurements.N/A
Icinga
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Icinga is an open source network monitoring platform. It includes automation, modularized integration packages, and prebuilt alerts and reporting capabilities.N/A
Zabbix
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Zabbix is an open-source network performance monitoring software. It includes prebuilt official and community-developed templates for integrating with networks, applications, and endpoints, and can automate some monitoring processes.N/A
Pricing
Broadcom Application Delivery AnalysisIcingaZabbix
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Broadcom Application Delivery AnalysisIcingaZabbix
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Broadcom Application Delivery AnalysisIcingaZabbix
Considered Multiple Products
Broadcom Application Delivery Analysis

No answer on this topic

Icinga
Chose Icinga
While Icinga holds its own against old stalwarts like Nagios and Zabbix, it simply can't compete with the new generation of SaaS service/server monitoring software in terms of ease of use, feature-completeness, integration with things like Cloudwatch, CloudHealth, New Relic, …
Chose Icinga
Icinga was initially a fork of Nagios. Over time, the configuration language was replaced with something more programmatic. This configuration language is one of the big sellers of this product. It allows flexible, quick configuration of large sets of hosts and services with …
Chose Icinga
The best of commercial products is nearly as good at cross platform monitoring as Icinga, and all of them are expensive.
Zabbix
Chose Zabbix
Zabbix had the best support for the devices I initially had in my network, its ability to adapt and change has made it my Swiss Army knife of monitoring tools. While it could benefit greatly from a moderated zabbix community, its support from the open source community has …
Features
Broadcom Application Delivery AnalysisIcingaZabbix
Application Performance Management
Comparison of Application Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Broadcom Application Delivery Analysis
9.6
1 Ratings
21% above category average
Icinga
-
Ratings
Zabbix
-
Ratings
Application monitoring9.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Database monitoring9.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Threshold alerts10.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Predictive capabilities10.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Application performance management console10.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration tools9.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Out-of-the box templates to monitor applications9.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Application dependency mapping and thresholding10.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Virtualization monitoring10.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Server availability and performance monitoring10.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Server usage monitoring and capacity forecasting9.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
IT Asset Discovery10.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Broadcom Application Delivery AnalysisIcingaZabbix
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
ConnectWise Automate
ConnectWise Automate
Score 8.4 out of 10
ConnectWise Automate
ConnectWise Automate
Score 8.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 9.5 out of 10
Logz.io
Logz.io
Score 8.5 out of 10
Icinga
Icinga
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 9.5 out of 10
ScienceLogic SL1
ScienceLogic SL1
Score 8.8 out of 10
ScienceLogic SL1
ScienceLogic SL1
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Broadcom Application Delivery AnalysisIcingaZabbix
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(7 ratings)
8.3
(28 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(4 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(5 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Broadcom Application Delivery AnalysisIcingaZabbix
Likelihood to Recommend
Broadcom
Look no farther than this tool if you need an API testing solution that also includes service virtualization. This technology also forces you to move your testing lifecycle to earlier stages of development, which improves the overall SDLC.
Read full review
Icinga GmbH
Icinga is a world-class monitoring system. It can be used for most general monitoring situations. It is not a silver bullet, however, and there are instances where domain-specific monitoring systems are necessary. However, the output from those monitoring systems can be funneled into Icinga as a central monitoring and alerting system.
Read full review
Zabbix
Zabbix is great for monitoring your servers and seeing alerts when the system uses too much CPU or memory. This allowed the system Engineer to be proactive and add resources to these systems to avoid interrupting the services. Especially servers running operations applications and services. This is one of the best usages for Zabbix.
Read full review
Pros
Broadcom
  • This is an excellent tool for implementing Service virtualization in your own and/or third-party web services. This ensures that our automation and performance test environments are always available and consistent.
  • This application also aids in the setup and maintenance of test data, which is an important component of test automation.
Read full review
Icinga GmbH
  • Wealth of community-developed plugins.
  • Stable codebase.
  • Icinga 2 supports distributed monitoring.
  • Very performant, can support tens of thousands of checks per server.
Read full review
Zabbix
  • Collecting hardware data - CPU, Memory, Network, and Disk Metrics are collected and reported on.
  • Flexible design - It is very easy to build out even very large environments via the templating system. You can also start where you are - network monitoring, server monitoring, etc. and then build it out from there as time and resources permit.
  • Provides a "plugin architecture" (via XML templates) to allow end users to extend it to monitor all kinds of equipment, software, or other metrics that are not already added into the software already.
  • Very complete documentation. Almost every aspect of Zabbix has been documented and reported on.
  • Cost - Zabbix is FOSS software and always free. Support is reasonably priced and readily available.
Read full review
Cons
Broadcom
  • This tool has a license fee and is not free. Many open-source tools provide free API testing solutions, therefore turning some of this tool's features open-source might be beneficial.
  • The tool's load testing component is not integrated and instead relies on the free Blaze meter.
Read full review
Icinga GmbH
  • High learning curve, setting up Icinga from scratch can be a bit of a challenge starting out.
  • If the io2db process fails you UI stops updating, which can be very frustrating.
  • There is no simple mechanism for adding new hosts and services through the web UI, it's all very config-file based.
Read full review
Zabbix
  • Creating an alert & its trigger can be made easier.
  • More VM-based data collection counters should be introduced to have better VM monitoring.
  • The raw counters collection agent in every node is relatively weak. It goes down often, which needs more stability.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Icinga GmbH
Icinga is a solid solution which does everything it promises. It is backwards compatible with most Nagios instances, making the transition very easy. Once you get the hang of installing new plugins and editing configuration files expanding its monitoring capabilities are easy.
Read full review
Zabbix
It is free. It didn't cost anything to implement (other than my time and the cost incurred for it) and it is filling a badly needed gap in our IT infrastructure. Support is available if we have issues and can be done annually or paid for on a per incident basis as needed. Expansion, updates, and all other future lifecycle activities are likewise free of cost, so as long as someone is able to implement/maintain the software (and the OSS project is maintained) then I imagine the company will never leave it.
Read full review
Usability
Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Icinga GmbH
No answers on this topic
Zabbix
I think every organization, especially the IT department, needs a tool like this. I know of another product like Zabbix that gives a similar or the same solution, but its range makes it very useful. You can see almost all the device info in one place: disk usage, disk space, network usage, etc.
Read full review
Support Rating
Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Icinga GmbH
No answers on this topic
Zabbix
The setup is the most time-consuming portion of using zabbix. It takes a lot of effort to shape it into a usable format and even then it can get very messy. It's not exactly intuitive and as mentioned the UI seems a bit antiquated. If I was to roll out a monitoring solution from scratch, I'd probably look for alternatives which are easier to use and maintain.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Icinga GmbH
No answers on this topic
Zabbix
We are a mainly Windows environment, so it would be useful if we could have used Active Directory to deploy agents. As of version 4.2, Zabbix has announced a new agent MSI file to allow exactly that. Unfortunately, we didn't have that option. Also, for Linux and MAC deployments, there is no simple way to deploy that. Using remote scripts you may be able to create something, but most places will opt for either SNMP (agentless) or manual installation of agents to add to Zabbix. A way of deploying agents via discovery would go a long way to helping in the adoption of the tool.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Broadcom
Along with the Parasoft SOA tool, it is unquestionably among the top leaders in API testing and virtualization. Many open-source API testing libraries are free, including Rest Assured, Karate, and even Postman and SOAP UI, which goes against CA.
Read full review
Icinga GmbH
Icinga is better than Nagios because of its nicer user interface. New Relic can monitor CPU/memory and disk usage, but it's more of a performance and application troubleshooting tool rather than monitoring
Read full review
Zabbix
We're using the Solarwinds suite as our global monitoring standard, but it is very complex and its licensing model makes it difficult to monitor a wide range of technologies. So, we're using Zabbix as a complement on our monitoring process. Zabbix is a way more flexible and has free integrations to a wide range of technologies. It is also more 'user friendly' and easy to manage.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Broadcom
  • In our group, this instrument produced a high return on investment. We saw a considerable reduction in downtime in our test environments thanks to service virtualization.
  • In addition, service virtualization reduces the expenses of interacting with third-party services, which is common in low-cost contexts.
Read full review
Icinga GmbH
  • With one check you know which applications are faulty e.g. after an upgrade. Which is big time saver
  • You easily detect outages ion the applications so that your customer ideally does not even realize there was an outage.
  • Detect if the environment does deliver the same result as in the same time as before to detect shortages.
  • Additional information when debugging. Saved us several hours where we could simply point to a database which was slow.
Read full review
Zabbix
  • Good ROI when trying to get ahead of network related problems instead of waiting for users to complain
  • Good ROI when doing upgrades or exploratory work on a neglected network
  • Good ROI when showing usage trends to management showing higher actual usage versus what was thought to be happening
Read full review
ScreenShots