BugTracker.net vs. TeamRetro

TeamRetro

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
BugTracker.net	Score 7.5 out of 10	N/A	N/A	N/A
TeamRetro	Score 0.0 out of 10	Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)	TeamRetro Agile Retrospective, Health Check and Estimation Platform TeamRetro supports Agile ceremonies, including retrospectives, team health evaluations, and story-by-story estimation for sprint planning. It provides features for anonymous input, AI grouping, and facilitation tools. Key Features Facilitates retrospective processes with pre-provisioned templates Includes anonymous brainstorming functionality and grouping mechanisms Includes facilitation…	$25 per month team

Pricing

BugTracker.net

TeamRetro

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Single Team: $25
per month team
Enterprise: Contact support
per year team

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
BugTracker.net	TeamRetro
Free Trial
No	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

Free 30 day trial 16.67% discount on yearly plans Volume discounts available Multiple currency payment options US or EU hosting Custom security questionnaires SOC 2 Type 2 Reports Data processing Agreements Enterprise Agreements

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	BugTracker.net	TeamRetro

Best Alternatives
	BugTracker.net	TeamRetro
Small Businesses	GitLab Score 8.9 out of 10	GitLab Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	GitLab Score 8.9 out of 10	Planview AgilePlace Score 7.7 out of 10
Enterprises	GitLab Score 8.9 out of 10	Planview AgilePlace Score 7.7 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	BugTracker.net	TeamRetro
Likelihood to Recommend	6.4 (2 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	7.2 (2 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	BugTracker.net	TeamRetro
Likelihood to Recommend	Open Source See above. Recommended questions: What type of feedback or tracking will we be doing? Will this need to be client-facing? How will we track content edits? How many users will be assigned to issues in a given project? Incentivized Kat Jenkins Vice President of Strategic Planning Read full review	GroupMap No answers on this topic
Pros	Open Source Ability to split our multiple projects and assign a user base. Ability to set permissions based on user base/ roles. Customization of fields on a project level. Incentivized Don Schminkey Project Manager Read full review	GroupMap No answers on this topic
Cons	Open Source User interface for client-facing feedback Content and design updates tracking Incentivized Kat Jenkins Vice President of Strategic Planning Read full review	GroupMap No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew	Open Source I would plan on renewing and staying with BugTracker.net simply because it is a no nonsense easy to use tool. Once you get it set up and understand the small nuances with this custom piece of software, it really is a great tool to help your organization get started with Defect Management and BugTracking without having to drop several thousands of dollars on tools that are more fluff than function. Incentivized Don Schminkey Project Manager Read full review	GroupMap No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	Open Source I didn't choose the product or evaluate other options, but I've been satisified with it except for tracking content changes. Incentivized Kat Jenkins Vice President of Strategic Planning Read full review	GroupMap No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	Open Source Decreased turn around time for defect fixes. Smoother builder deploys Clearer communication from QA to Dev Team Incentivized Don Schminkey Project Manager Read full review	GroupMap No answers on this topic
ScreenShots		TeamRetro Screenshots