BugTracker.net vs. Userback

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
BugTracker.net
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Userback
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Userback is a visual feedback and bug-reporting platform built for product, QA, and support teams who need to close the gap between what users report and what developers can actually act on. Instead of vague tickets, users submit feedback directly on the page via a screen recording, screenshot, or annotated capture — automatically paired with technical context like console logs, network requests, browser/OS details, and session replay. Key capabilities…
$39
per month
Pricing
BugTracker.netUserback
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Team
$39
per month
Business
$99
per month
Business Plus
$199
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BugTracker.netUserback
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual billing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BugTracker.netUserback
Considered Both Products
BugTracker.net
Chose BugTracker.net
I didn't choose the product or evaluate other options, but I've been satisified with it except for tracking content changes.
Chose BugTracker.net
In previous companies I have used, Spira Team, Jira, IBM Rational Clear Quest and Quality Center.
Userback

No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
BugTracker.netUserback
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BugTracker.netUserback
Likelihood to Recommend
6.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BugTracker.netUserback
Likelihood to Recommend
It is a great Bug Tracking tool when implemented and set up the correct way initially. If you find yourself in the position of having to go through and re name fields on a project level of having to do an overhaul of the user base you will find some frustrations, these are noted in the last question.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Tracking technical issues and assigning for review and completion
  • Tracking final status and quality of an application or website
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • If you edit a field you have created (Username, status, custom fields) you lose the ability to sort/filter on this field.
  • It would be nice to add more custom fields on a project specific level. Currently you can only add 3
  • It would be FANTASTIC if you could sort/filter on Project Specific custom fields.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
BugTracker.net works for what we need it to do from a technology standpoint.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
I didn't choose the product or evaluate other options, but I've been satisified with it except for tracking content changes.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Decreased turn around time for defect fixes.
  • Smoother builder deploys
  • Clearer communication from QA to Dev Team
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

Userback Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of