Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud Front Office

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud Front Office
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
N/A
$160
per month per user
Pricing
Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud Front Office
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud Front Office
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud Front Office
Considered Both Products
Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud Front Office
Chose Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud Front Office
Compared to using Microsoft, Jobscience is definitely more advanced and geared towards recruiting companies in general. While I think there are still ways in which JobScience can improve- I think that it definitely meets the needs of my company, a recruiting company, and serves …
Chose Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud Front Office
We use Jobscience to add candidates, upload resumes, and have certain fields such as Name, Location, Compensation Details, Non-compete Details, Packet highlights, and of course the Resume field, all of which are required in order to create a packet to submit to our clients. …
Chose Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud Front Office
It's a basic database. If you just need somewhere to house company or candidate information, it's great. If you need something who has more features- good set up for sales planning, marketing- it's not the best resource. The add-ins/integrations that are offered with it such …
Chose Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud Front Office
In addition to Jobscience we considered Talent Rover, Bullhorn, and JobDiva.

  • We eliminated JobDiva first because it was nowhere near flexible enough to support our ways of doing business.
Chose Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud Front Office
I have used Bullhorn, WinSearch, SendOuts, MaxHire, PCRecruiter, and, sadly, ACT as different ATSs in my career. JobScience is better than all of them. There really isn't a single thing that any of them do better than JobScience. From customization to ease of use to …
Chose Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud Front Office
Jobscience has a faster load time and more simple layout. It has a greater selection of features.
Features
Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud Front Office
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud Front Office
7.9
6 Ratings
0% below category average
Resume Management8.06 Ratings
Candidate Search8.36 Ratings
Reporting7.46 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud Front Office
Small Businesses
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
PeopleStrong
PeopleStrong
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud Front Office
Likelihood to Recommend
7.5
(6 ratings)
User Testimonials
Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud Front Office
Likelihood to Recommend
Bullhorn
Jobscience is a good fit for medium to large organizations, especially those who have various different lines of business and need one system to be able to handle them all. It is very difficult for me to imagine another system being able to accommodate the very different ways of doing business between our departments. Only a highly flexible system could have a chance at doing that.
Read full review
Pros
Bullhorn
  • JobScience is extremely customizable and flexible. This is a strength because you can tailor it to your workflow, rather than having to change your workflow to fit a software.
  • JobScience is the most intuitive ATS / CRM I have ever used. This is particularly important when hiring and training new employees. The faster they can come up to speed on the core software in your business, the faster they can start generating revenue.
  • JobScience has extremely powerful built in reports. I have yet to need a report that I couldn't build using the internal report wizard. It helps us understand all the numbers at the heart of our business, which is critical in decision making situations.
  • JobScience also has powerful automation components. The email alerts and automated tasks you can set up are great and boost efficiency. We use them a lot, and I suspect we may have only scratched the surface.
Read full review
Cons
Bullhorn
  • Multiple users - when multiple users edit a page, it doesn't show that there is someone else on the page and it only lets one person edit which can cause the information to be lost.
  • Action grid - it is a helpful page to use however it is extremely slow and takes a long time to load and can be a bit finicky.
  • It's simple - this is is also a positive, but I also think there could be additional resources added to it to make it more up to date and advanced.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Bullhorn
We use Jobscience to add candidates, upload resumes, and have certain fields such as Name, Location, Compensation Details, Non-compete Details, Packet highlights, and of course the Resume field, all of which are required in order to create a packet to submit to our clients. These packets are created using Conga ActionGrid, so Jobscience allows us to input all the information, and it would be great if we could create a packet directly through Jobscience, but we require Conga ActionGrid, as that is then used in Adobe PDF to create the final packet.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Bullhorn
  • It is convenient because I can see nationwide activity logged in the database from other locations in real time.
  • It's not a negative impact, just isn't as lead-generation or easy to use for candidate pool search as I would like.
Read full review
ScreenShots