Caffe Deep Learning Framework vs. IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data vs. Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Caffe Deep Learning Framework
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Caffe is a deep learning framework made with expression, speed, and modularity in mind. It is developed by Berkeley AI Research and by community contributors.N/A
IBM Watson Studio
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM Watson Studio enables users to build, run and manage AI models, and optimize decisions at scale across any cloud. IBM Watson Studio enables users can operationalize AI anywhere as part of IBM Cloud Pak® for Data, the IBM data and AI platform. The vendor states the solution simplifies AI lifecycle management and accelerates time to value with an open, flexible multicloud architecture.N/A
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft R Open and Revolution R Enterprise are big data R distribution for servers, Hadoop clusters, and data warehouses. Microsoft acquired original developer Revolution Analytics in 2016. Microsoft R is available in two editions: Microsoft R Open (formerly Revolution R Open) and Revolution R Enterprise.N/A
Pricing
Caffe Deep Learning FrameworkIBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataMicrosoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Caffe Deep Learning FrameworkIBM Watson StudioMicrosoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Caffe Deep Learning FrameworkIBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataMicrosoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Considered Multiple Products
Caffe Deep Learning Framework

No answer on this topic

IBM Watson Studio
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise

No answer on this topic

Features
Caffe Deep Learning FrameworkIBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataMicrosoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
Caffe Deep Learning Framework
-
Ratings
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
8.1
22 Ratings
3% below category average
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
5.3
3 Ratings
45% below category average
Connect to Multiple Data Sources00 Ratings8.022 Ratings6.13 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources00 Ratings8.022 Ratings6.03 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection00 Ratings10.021 Ratings6.03 Ratings
MDM Integration00 Ratings6.414 Ratings3.01 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
Caffe Deep Learning Framework
-
Ratings
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
10.0
22 Ratings
17% above category average
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
7.0
3 Ratings
19% below category average
Visualization00 Ratings10.022 Ratings7.03 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis00 Ratings10.022 Ratings7.03 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
Caffe Deep Learning Framework
-
Ratings
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
9.5
22 Ratings
15% above category average
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
4.8
3 Ratings
52% below category average
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment00 Ratings10.022 Ratings5.13 Ratings
Data Transformations00 Ratings10.021 Ratings5.03 Ratings
Data Encryption00 Ratings8.020 Ratings3.01 Ratings
Built-in Processors00 Ratings10.021 Ratings6.03 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Caffe Deep Learning Framework
-
Ratings
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
9.5
22 Ratings
12% above category average
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
6.0
3 Ratings
33% below category average
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools00 Ratings10.021 Ratings5.03 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning00 Ratings10.022 Ratings5.02 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development00 Ratings10.022 Ratings8.03 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery00 Ratings8.020 Ratings6.03 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
Caffe Deep Learning Framework
-
Ratings
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
8.0
22 Ratings
6% below category average
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
6.5
2 Ratings
27% below category average
Flexible Model Publishing Options00 Ratings9.022 Ratings6.02 Ratings
Security, Governance, and Cost Controls00 Ratings7.022 Ratings6.92 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Caffe Deep Learning FrameworkIBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataMicrosoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Small Businesses
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 8.0 out of 10
Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook
Score 8.5 out of 10
Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Caffe Deep Learning FrameworkIBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataMicrosoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Likelihood to Recommend
4.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(65 ratings)
6.0
(5 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.6
(2 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Caffe Deep Learning FrameworkIBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataMicrosoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Likelihood to Recommend
Open Source
Caffe is only appropriate for some new beginners who don't want to write any lines of code, just want to use existing models for image recognition, or have some taste of the so-called Deep Learning.
Read full review
IBM
It has a lot of features that are good for teams working on large-scale projects and continuously developing and reiterating their data project models. Really helpful when dealing with large data. It is a kind of one-stop solution for all data science tasks like visualization, cleaning, analyzing data, and developing models but small teams might find a lot of features unuseful.
Read full review
Microsoft
If you are a MS shop specifically, or have more generic data requirement needs from Microsoft sourced data this will work well. If you have a lot of disparate data across a number of unique platforms/cloud systems/3rd party hosted data warehouses then this product will have issues or a lack of documentation on the net. Performance-wise this product is equal to other R platforms out there.
Read full review
Pros
Open Source
  • Caffe is good for traditional image-based CNN as this was its original purpose.
Read full review
IBM
  • Integration of IBM Watson APIs such as speech to text, image recognition, personality insights, etc.
  • SPSS modeler and neural network model provide no-code environments for data scientists to build pipelines quickly.
  • Enforced best-practices set up POCs for deployment in production with a minimum of re-work.
  • Estimator validation lets data scientists test and prove different models.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • It allows distributed algorithm runs on Hadoop HDFS cluster
  • It allows using different file formats such as SAS7BAT files or complex files in tab or comma delimited making data munging easier
  • It provides scalable solutions by allowing users to re-use R scripts and distributing the computing over nodes through RHadoop
Read full review
Cons
Open Source
  • Caffe's model definition - static configuration files are really painful. Maintaining big configuration files with so many parameters and details of many layers can be a really challenging task.
  • Besides imagine and vision (CNN), Caffe also gradually adds some other NN architecture support. It doesn't play well in a recurrent domain, so we have to say variety is a problem.
  • Caffe's deployment for production is not easy. The community support and project development all mean it is almost fading out of the market.
  • The learning curve is quite steep. Although TensorFlow's is not easy to master either, the reward for Caffe is much less than the TensorFlow can offer.
Read full review
IBM
  • The cost is steep and so only companies with resources can afford it
  • It will be nice to have Chinese versions so that Chinese engineers can also use it easily
  • It takes a while to learn how to input different kinds of skin defects for detection
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Very steep learning curve... for such a quick and useful tool the learning curve is unacceptable.
  • Very dangerous in the wrong hands. Because most add-ons are pre-written, you have to trust the community that malicious script is not used.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Open Source
No answers on this topic
IBM
because we find out that DSX results have improved our approach to the whole subject (data, models, procedures)
Read full review
Microsoft
In general, Revolution Analytics brings a lot of value to the organization. The renewal decision would be based on return on investment in terms of quantified actionable insights that are getting generated against the cost of the product. Additionally, market brand of the tool and reputation risk in terms of possible acquisition and its impact to overall organizational analytic strategy would be considered as well.
Read full review
Usability
Open Source
No answers on this topic
IBM
The UI flawlessly merges this offering by providing a neat, minimal, responsive interface
Read full review
Microsoft
It is good, easy to use, improvements are being made to the product and more info being shared in the community. It just needs some more time to become more integrated to other platforms and tools/data out there.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Open Source
No answers on this topic
IBM
From time to time there are services unavailable, but we have been always informed before and they got back to work sooner than expected
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Performance
Open Source
No answers on this topic
IBM
Never had slow response even on our very busy network
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Open Source
No answers on this topic
IBM
I received answers mostly at once and got answered even further my question: they gave me interesting points of view and suggestion for deepening in the learning path
Read full review
Microsoft
Generally support comes through the forums and user generated channels which are helpful, easy to access, quickly turned around and provided by knowledgeable users. However the support channels are not employees and the channels are often used as a way to learn quick difficult elements of R. Better design, users interface and tutorial options would alleviate the need for this sort of interaction.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Open Source
No answers on this topic
IBM
The trainers on the job are very smart with solutions and very able in teaching
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Open Source
No answers on this topic
IBM
The Platform is very handy and suggests further steps according my previous interests
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Open Source
No answers on this topic
IBM
It surprised us with unpredictable case of use and brand new points of view
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Open Source
TensorFlow is kind of low-level API most suited for those developers who like to control the details, while Keras provides some kind of high-level API for those users who want to boost their project or experiment by reusing most of the existing architecture or models and the accumulated best practice. However, Caffe isn't like either of them so the position for the user is kind of embarrassing.
Read full review
IBM
The main reason I personally changed over from Azure ML Studio is because it lacked any support for significant custom modelling with packages and services such as TensorFlow, scikit-learn, Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit and Spark ML. IBM Watson Studio provides these services and does so in a well integrated and easy to use fashion making it a preferable service over the other services that I have personally used.
Read full review
Microsoft
The two are different products for different purposes. But for someone who has little or no experience in R programming, Power BI would be better for starting with. Having said that, Microsoft R is built on R, thus allowing for customization of complex calculations not typically available otherwise.
Read full review
Scalability
Open Source
No answers on this topic
IBM
It helped us in getting from 0 to DSX without getting lost
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Open Source
  • Since we stopped using Caffe before it can reach the production phase, there is no clear ROI that can be defined.
Read full review
IBM
  • Could instantly show data driven insights to drive 20% incremental revenue over existing results
  • Still don't have a real use case for unstructured data like twitter feed
  • Some of the insights around user actions have driven new projects to automate mundane tasks
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Helped save company money versus buying other stat software
Read full review
ScreenShots