TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Foundation Directory Online by Candid vs. Foundant Grant Lifecycle Manager

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Foundation Directory Online by Candid

    Score9.3 out of 10
    N/AThe Foundation Directory Online (FDO) is an online database of donations, donors, and grantmakers, from Candid.orgN/A

    Foundant Grant Lifecycle Manager

    Score6 out of 10
    N/AWith Foundant GLM, users can create, launch and receive online applications and grant reports, manage online proposal reviews, and manage grants and information from a single, integrated solution from anywhere they have internet access.N/A
    Pricing
    Foundation Directory Online by CandidFoundant Grant Lifecycle Manager
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Foundation Directory Online by CandidFoundant Grant Lifecycle Manager
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    Foundation Directory Online by CandidFoundant Grant Lifecycle Manager
    Small Businesses
    Bonterra Network for Good
    Score9.3 out of 10
    Blackbaud Grantmaking
    Score9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    GiveSmart by Momentive
    Score7.5 out of 10
    Submittable
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Kindsight iWave
    Score8.4 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Foundation Directory Online by CandidFoundant Grant Lifecycle Manager
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (3 ratings)
    3.0
    (13 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Foundation Directory Online by CandidFoundant Grant Lifecycle Manager
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Candid.org
    Beyond any pros or cons, the simple fact is that FDO is the industry standard for grant prospecting databases. Others like GrantStation, GrantSearch, and more can offer some other functionalities or different UX/UI, but ultimately I've never found something that other search platforms had that FDO did not. If you are a non-profit organization, you need a subscription to FDO if you have any serious interest in prospecting (and getting) institutional funding.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Foundant Technologies
    From where I stand, GLM is well-suited for use by small-staffed charitable foundations who make more than thirty (30) grants a year and distribute more than $500,000 in funds to non-profits. The software is able to handle every step in the grant-making process from receipt of a request, to the evaluation and decision regarding the grant, to tracking the pay-out, and to closing the grant when the work or the year is completed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Candid.org
    • Summarizing foundation information (contact info, funding priorities, geographic priorities, etc.) in a user-friendly format
    • Recommending similar foundations based on certain criteria, this is helpful when looking for new funding opportunities
    • Being able to search through organization's 990s using crtl + F
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Foundant Technologies
    • Foundant provides a streamlined grants management solution for reasonable cost.
    • The company listens to its users, collecting ideas and making improvements. Updates to the software are rolled out several times a year. When something cannot be changed right away, the company gives context and forecasts when the change might be possible.
    • While the software is easy to use, it also offers more advanced features (such as merge templates) that allow more customization for the advanced user.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Candid.org
    • As this platform grows, more data will be available and I'm looking forward to even further narrowed search results.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Foundant Technologies
    • Need a smother process for third party responses. Currently individuals recommending more than one student for scholarships have many emails to deal with to find the correct link to upload the correct student's letter.
    • Questions that would filter which applications the applicant would apply for.
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Candid.org
    Any question is answered within 24-48 hours, professionally. If one person can't answer right away, they will seek answers within their support group and find the answer for you.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Foundant Technologies
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Candid.org
    I have also used Grant Station and GuideStar for foundation research and have found Foundation Directory Online to be the most user-friendly, provide the most detailed information about foundations, and to have the best search features in order to find the funders that I am looking for as well as to discover new funders
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Foundant Technologies
    I have not used other online grantmaking products or evaluated others. I used to use MicroEdge Gifts, but not the online application version. It was a stand alone management system. This is hands-down better, easier to use and a more complete system
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Candid.org
    • We don't apply for many grants, however; we use look for resources to direct nonprofit when looking for additional funding outside of our funding process.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Foundant Technologies
    • Positive customer service--fairly easy to use for applicants.
    • Positive--easy to run reports you have already set up, so [it] saves time.
    • Negative--limited question types makes it harder to gather the data we want to track.
    • Negative--our budget is more complex than can be tracked in Foundant, so we have to use a separate program.
    • Negative--we have to track potential grantee conversations in a separate program.
    • Negative--getting data ready to display in a dashboard takes a lot of time to manipulate in Excel.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots