IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…
N/A
Pricing
Caterease
IFS Applications
Editions & Modules
Express
$85
per month
Standard
$125
per month
Professional
$165
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Caterease
IFS Applications
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Prices are available at a 20% discount if billed annually.
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Caterease
IFS Applications
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Caterease and IFS Applications
Feature
Caterease
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
4.7
3 Ratings
46% below category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
7.43 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
6.43 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Caterease and IFS Applications
Feature
Caterease
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
8.7
5 Ratings
14% above category average
API for custom integration
00 Ratings
8.75 Ratings
Plug-ins
00 Ratings
8.75 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Caterease and IFS Applications
Feature
Caterease
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
9.9
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Single sign-on capability
00 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
9.85 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Caterease and IFS Applications
Feature
Caterease
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
8.8
5 Ratings
15% above category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
8.55 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
8.35 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
9.55 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Caterease and IFS Applications
Feature
Caterease
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
7.5
5 Ratings
3% below category average
Accounts payable
00 Ratings
9.55 Ratings
Accounts receivable
00 Ratings
9.55 Ratings
Global Financial Support
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
00 Ratings
9.34 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
00 Ratings
8.84 Ratings
Standardized Processes
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Caterease and IFS Applications
Feature
Caterease
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
9.1
5 Ratings
13% above category average
Inventory tracking
00 Ratings
9.35 Ratings
Automatic reordering
00 Ratings
9.55 Ratings
Location management
00 Ratings
9.55 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Caterease and IFS Applications
Feature
Caterease
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
6.3
5 Ratings
23% below category average
Pricing
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Order entry
00 Ratings
8.25 Ratings
Credit card processing
00 Ratings
8.74 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
00 Ratings
8.35 Ratings
Order Orchestration
00 Ratings
7.84 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Caterease and IFS Applications
Feature
Caterease
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
3.9
4 Ratings
64% below category average
Billing Management
00 Ratings
8.34 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
00 Ratings
8.84 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
00 Ratings
8.84 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
00 Ratings
7.84 Ratings
Period Close
00 Ratings
9.34 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Caterease and IFS Applications
Feature
Caterease
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
00 Ratings
3.01 Ratings
Project Costing
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Cost Capture
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Capital Project Management
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Caterease and IFS Applications
Feature
Caterease
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
67% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
00 Ratings
9.54 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
00 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
00 Ratings
7.54 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
00 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Caterease and IFS Applications
Feature
Caterease
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
9.3
2 Ratings
23% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management
00 Ratings
9.32 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Caterease and IFS Applications
Feature
Caterease
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
68% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared
00 Ratings
9.33 Ratings
Contract Authoring
00 Ratings
8.33 Ratings
Contract Repository
00 Ratings
8.33 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
00 Ratings
9.24 Ratings
Supplier Management
00 Ratings
9.24 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Caterease and IFS Applications
Feature
Caterease
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
5.0
4 Ratings
30% below category average
Risk Repository
00 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
Control Management
00 Ratings
8.74 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
00 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
Issue Detection
00 Ratings
7.54 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
00 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Caterease and IFS Applications
Feature
Caterease
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
7.8
4 Ratings
11% above category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization
00 Ratings
8.32 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
00 Ratings
7.73 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
00 Ratings
8.54 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Caterease and IFS Applications
Feature
Caterease
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
6.8
4 Ratings
10% below category average
Production Process Design
00 Ratings
9.33 Ratings
Production Management
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Configuration Management
00 Ratings
8.84 Ratings
Work Execution
00 Ratings
9.34 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
00 Ratings
9.54 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Caterease and IFS Applications
Feature
Caterease
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
9.1
4 Ratings
21% above category average
Forecasting
00 Ratings
8.84 Ratings
Inventory Planning
00 Ratings
9.54 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
00 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Caterease and IFS Applications
Integration with Microsoft Access - We use Access for a lot of different Queries, such as for our bar back to know the specifics of each bar. Caterease allows Access to pull data directly so all we have to do is run the report instead of entering all the information manually. Same with diagramming, having software like Placez that pulls from Caterease allows for such things as table and chair counts to be pulled directly from Caterease instead of having to place each individual table.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It’s a great program, but it’s missing some aspects that would be incredibly useful. It has the ability to store venues and locations that you’ve used in the past, but it doesn’t allow you to associate a tax rate with the saved venue. As our company handles events all throughout Southern California and tax rates are constantly changing, it would be nice to be able to assign certain tax rates to certain zip codes and venues.
It can be a little finicky sometimes with its equipment conflict algorithm. There will be events In the system that have been marked as cancelled, yet it will insist that an event I am working on has an equipment conflict with it (even though that event is not going through). It will not let you save out of your event and, sometimes, will end up deleting all your changes and progress, which is incredibly frustrating.
I wish there was a way to export PDFs of your proposals without re-saving your entire proposal. Sometimes, clients will ask for two versions of the same proposal with just slight changes, and it’s annoying to have to go in and completely re-do and save the proposal and have to adjust it back to the original.
It would be nice if there was a way to see a history of all of the changes that had been made in a proposal, that would be great. Because we often have many hands on each event we do, having a comprehensive list of all the changes made to each proposal and the date and times, and users who made these changes would be an incredible asset.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I have not had to use the support in my over 3 years of using Caterease. This is why I gave it a 9 rating because even though I haven't had to interact with support, the fact that I haven't had to use support speaks volumes to how good the software is and how it is user friendly.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
I haven’t used too many other events programs in the past – at a former company, we used the back end of our website in order to create events, but Caterease is a lot more user-friendly. Our website wasn’t particularly fancy – it didn’t allow us to conflict check or see if there was another event at the same time. It was used for the sole purpose of posting the information to our system – not for creating full proposals. Caterease is much more effective for what we need to use it for in this context.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info