Cegid Talent (based on technology from the former Technomedia, acquired by Cegid in 2016), allows users to manage candidates recruiting, training, performance, compensation, career development and succession. Its business intelligence tools help identify organizational potential in order to drive HR strategies, from the cloud.
N/A
Lumesse TalentLink (legacy)
Score4 out of 10
N/A
Lumesse was a talent management suite. Its core functionality is in recruiting and applicant tracking. Lumesse also offers other recruiting features, as well as onboarding and analytics capabilities. It was acquired by Saba and is no longer available.
N/A
Pricing
Cegid Talent
Lumesse TalentLink (legacy)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cegid Talent
Lumesse TalentLink (legacy)
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Cegid Talent
Lumesse TalentLink (legacy)
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Cegid Talent and Lumesse TalentLink (legacy)
Feature
Cegid Talent
3.3
1 Ratings
75% below category average
Lumesse TalentLink (legacy)
7.0
2 Ratings
4% below category average
New hire portal
3.01 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
4.01 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting
3.01 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Cegid Talent and Lumesse TalentLink (legacy)
Feature
Cegid Talent
3.0
1 Ratings
78% below category average
Lumesse TalentLink (legacy)
7.3
1 Ratings
6% above category average
Manager note taking
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review status tracking
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Workflow restrictions
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Reporting
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Cegid Talent and Lumesse TalentLink (legacy)
Feature
Cegid Talent
2.0
1 Ratings
109% below category average
Lumesse TalentLink (legacy)
6.3
1 Ratings
7% below category average
Create succession plans/pools
2.01 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Candidate search
2.01 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Candidate ranking
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Cegid Talent and Lumesse TalentLink (legacy)
Feature
Cegid Talent
3.5
1 Ratings
68% below category average
Lumesse TalentLink (legacy)
7.3
1 Ratings
3% above category average
Job Requisition Management
6.01 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Company Website Posting
5.01 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Customized Application Form
4.01 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Resume Management
6.01 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate Search
2.01 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Applicant Tracking
5.01 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Collaboration
1.01 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation
2.01 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Email Templates
5.01 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
User Permissions
1.01 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts
3.01 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Reporting
1.01 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Publish to Social Media
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Cegid Talent and Lumesse TalentLink (legacy)
Recruiting and human resources is a good use for this tool. To some degree, reporting is fairly appropriate as well, unless you want super detailed reports, then I would say no. Anything related to managing candidate flow and making the recruitment process easier is where this tool is best used, upgrades need to be made so it's more useful in other areas before rolling out.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The commands and controls are fairly user friendly. This is a positive because as recruiters we don't want to waste time having to learn odd or awkward controls, we just want to intuitively click.
The original implementation process was fairly seamless according to industry standards. This made for a smoother rollout, testing, and implementation phase. We didn't waste too much time with overly complicated technical issues, etc.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It has open text boxes to add notes, on the individual candidate home page. Which is helpful when making a quick look at an individual, these notes are very obvious.
It has a search function; however it lacks a wild card (*); so if a req or candidate are spelled differently or referred to differently, there is no way to find them
The reporting function needs to be vastly improved. You can run the most basic reports, but if you want to get more granular it requires customization, extra fees, and involving a developer. This piece should be made easier.
The lag time between load screens, clicking new screens, etc. was very slow at times. We don't believe this was a connectivity issue, rather something on Technomedia's end.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I have found the system to be very inconsistent and "buggy", for lack of a better term. Today I searched for an internal requisition number and the system could not find the data. I found it by scrolling through manually, and verified that I had entered the information precisely as it appeared. There seems to be no explanation as to why it could not locate this particular entry, but I have been able to use the function without a problem in other instances.
The navigation is not intuitive or user-friendly. It takes an exorbitant amount of clicks to accomplish a task. Each action is confusing and time-consuming.
The system requires a large amount of redundant information in order to enter a job and does not auto-populate. If I indicate a position is located in Chicago, it would logically follow that the state is "Illinois", the country is "United States", and the currency is "USD". I have to manually input these details in both the requisition as well as the separate job advertisement page.
Changes to the job requisition are not reflected in the job advertisement, as they are separate entities. If you need to make a change, you have to update the details twice.
Technomedia stacks up below the other listed programs. It may solve the bare minimum of your issues, but when it comes to solving more complex issues and processes, it lacks. When you want to add additions or customize things, the process is very costly and labor intensive as well. If it were priced lower, it would make more sense, but there are much better solutions out there.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Lumesse is an average to abover average ATS in my opinion. We work with Lumesse because they came to us with our new client. I don't have an overall issue with Lumesse like I do with some other ATS's.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Decreased employee efficiency -- There are so many steps to create an entry that our recruiters use the system as little as possible. We had hoped to use Lumesse for centralizing information and reporting, but have not been able to do so. Instead, each recruiter keeps a separate Excel sheet, defeating the purpose of having an ATS in the first place. We only use Lumesse to post to our website now. We are very disappointed.