TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cerner HealtheIntent

    Score3.5 out of 10
    N/ACerner offers their population health management software platform, HealtheIntent, their cloud-based data reconciliation and population stratification platform to provide a comprehensive population health management solution.N/A

    Red Arc

    Score9 out of 10
    N/ARed Arc builds apps that extend Blackbaud's Raiser's Edge NXT. These include a personalized letter writing tool, a Shopify connector, apps to enable calling directly from Raiser's Edge NXT, email marketing tool connectors, and other apps.N/A
    Pricing
    Cerner HealtheIntentRed Arc
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Cerner HealtheIntentRed Arc
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Cerner HealtheIntentRed Arc
    Interoperability Platforms Features
    Comparison of Interoperability Platforms Features features of Cerner HealtheIntent and Red Arc
    Feature
    Cerner HealtheIntent
    -
    Ratings
    Red Arc
    8.0
    1 Ratings
    0% above category average
    Data Integration:00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Application Incorporation00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Data Format Transformation00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Customizations00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Cerner HealtheIntentRed Arc
    Likelihood to Recommend
    6.0
    (2 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Cerner HealtheIntentRed Arc
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Oracle
    My honest opinion is if an organization is fully running a Cerner EMR, it is almost not avoidable choice to use HealtheIntent. From performance and consistency views, it performs very well simply because HealtheIntent and Cerner EMR are from the same place. From the cost perspective, it's up to the contract. But in a general sense, it is more cost effective rather than running a separate analytics framework. If an organization is running a mix of Cerner and other clinical IT system, the answer is all but case by case.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Arc
    When Raiser's Edge initially discontinued direct integration with Microsoft Word, I was worried my time spent on exporting data, then reuploading into Word Merge would just increase and feel less productive. Red Arc filled the need for a receipting program that I don't have to leave RE NXT to use!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Oracle
    • Reliability means Cerner HealtheIntent hardly ever goes down
    • Cerner HealtheIntent can be customized for our business needs
    • We have our own Cerner HealtheIntent server instead of using the cloud
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Arc
    No answers on this topic
    Cons
    Oracle
    • Metadata management in HealtheIntent should be improved. For example, we could find similar looking data sources (for example, diagnosis tables with similar names) but it was hard to distinguish and know which one is the one in production. It was because several data stewards loaded the same table with a different purpose (with similar tables names). And HealtheIntent doesn't have a metadata "for a test" or "for development", which makes hard to manage versions of one data source.
    • To run a SQL in HealtheIntent, there is a time limit of only 10 minutes. Also, there is no delicate configuration of query execution. It may not need a lot of functions like Toad or SQL developer, but what HealtheIntent provides is very limited.
    • Similar to the one above, HealtheIntent may need better metadata management for users. It is hard to find a table that I need, even to find out the existence of the table. Basic statistics like the size of a table, # of rows may be helpful for users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Arc
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Red Arc
    I appreciate the free version, the support team was quick to respond when I was a new user with some questions, and it is pretty easy to use "out of the box"
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Oracle
    We have had Cerner HealtheIntent for over 10 years and it has been a strong EMR. Other EMRs have been OK. They have just done the job, but haven't lived up to their promise. When a patch is put out for Cerner HealtheIntent, it actually works without bugs. Reaching support for Cerner HealtheIntent is easier and our issues are taken care of in a timely manner.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Arc
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Oracle
    • ROI may be depending on the contract. But even if an organization is spending the same money for either homegrown analytics or HealtheIntent, HealtheIntent provides more agility of project or cost spending. If you don't like it you can discontinue anytime.
    • The negative one is, HealtheIntent is a new product in Cerner and at this point, it may not be capable of everything like homegrown analytics. The question would be the future of HealtheIntent and will be able to cover what you need soon.
    • If an organization is pursuing a standard, generic analytics and reporting (such as the combination of Oracle and Tableau), HealtheIntent is great. If not (for example, running R and d3.js for specific cases), the cost of migration to HealtheIntent will skyrocket.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Arc
    No answers on this topic
    ScreenShots