Certinia PS Cloud software is a cloud-based services solution that is built on the Force.com platform. It allows companies to manage professional resources, customers, projects and financials in one integrated services management application. Because the solution works natively with Force.com, it utilizes the same data for sales, services and finance on one system.
N/A
Infor VISUAL
Score7.2 out of 10
N/A
Infor VISUAL is an ERP software focused on manufacturing companies with business intelligence, planning and scheduling, and pricing, quoting, and estimating capabilities, among others.
N/A
Pricing
Certinia PS Cloud
Infor VISUAL
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Certinia PS Cloud
Infor VISUAL
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Required
No setup fee
Additional Details
Certinia Professional Services Cloud software follows a subscription-based pricing model that is typically structured according to the number of users and the level of features required. The software’s pricing may vary depending on the organization’s size and needs, with options to select modules or add-ons for additional functionality. Specific pricing details may require a consultation or quote from Certinia for tailored solutions.
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Certinia PS Cloud
Infor VISUAL
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Certinia PS Cloud and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Certinia PS Cloud
-
Ratings
Infor VISUAL
1.0
1 Ratings
153% below category average
API for custom integration
00 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Certinia PS Cloud and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Certinia PS Cloud
-
Ratings
Infor VISUAL
9.0
1 Ratings
7% above category average
Single sign-on capability
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Certinia PS Cloud and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Certinia PS Cloud
-
Ratings
Infor VISUAL
4.0
3 Ratings
61% below category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
2.02 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Certinia PS Cloud and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Certinia PS Cloud
-
Ratings
Infor VISUAL
7.4
3 Ratings
4% below category average
Accounts payable
00 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Accounts receivable
00 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Global Financial Support
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Standardized Processes
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Certinia PS Cloud and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Certinia PS Cloud
-
Ratings
Infor VISUAL
8.0
4 Ratings
0% above category average
Inventory tracking
00 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Automatic reordering
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Location management
00 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Certinia PS Cloud and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Certinia PS Cloud
-
Ratings
Infor VISUAL
9.7
4 Ratings
20% above category average
Pricing
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Order entry
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
00 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
Order Orchestration
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Certinia PS Cloud and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Certinia PS Cloud
-
Ratings
Infor VISUAL
8.6
2 Ratings
13% above category average
Billing Management
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Period Close
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Certinia PS Cloud and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Certinia PS Cloud
-
Ratings
Infor VISUAL
7.2
1 Ratings
5% below category average
Project Costing
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Cost Capture
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Certinia PS Cloud and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Certinia PS Cloud
-
Ratings
Infor VISUAL
3.2
2 Ratings
80% below category average
Production Process Design
00 Ratings
2.02 Ratings
Production Management
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Configuration Management
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Work Execution
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
00 Ratings
2.02 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Certinia PS Cloud and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Certinia PS Cloud
-
Ratings
Infor VISUAL
2.0
1 Ratings
114% below category average
Inventory Planning
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Certinia PS Cloud and Infor VISUAL
PSA is great at capturing all the data you would need to accurately track and report on consulting projects. It captures project financials, calculates projected GM%, and (among others) allows for hourly tracking of employees, which breaks it up between billable and non-billable for utilization tracking to accurately understand costs. However, the user interface is tough to learn, and the stability of the data reporting functions is questionable. This tool would be great for smaller consulting shops that fit the standard contracting mold. If your business is fairly straightforward without a lot of shades of gray, you shouldn't have much trouble with the tool. However, if your business practices have a lot of exceptions based on clients, then you'll have a tall administrative task on your hands.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I struggle to identify a scenario where VISUAL is an appropriate solution. We used VISUAL because it was a legacy system and the cost/complexity of changeover seemed daunting. The user interface is poor as is the interconnectedness of the various screens and menus. This might be an acceptable piece of software for a continuous manufacturing environment with little variation of basic design, but we have had to write multiple add-on macros in order to get VISUAL to work effectively for us.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The biggest strength of FinancialForce PSA is that it's built upon the force.com platform, which means it is very easily customizable to our business needs.
Projects are easily created, as well as milestones and assignments.
"Actuals" (dollars and hours) are calculated automatically, and are easily reported on.
Resources are easily managed by using the Resource Planner
Infor Visual has a standard way of addressing business operations: sales orders, invoicing, reporting. It is easy to train operators used to using a manual or other ERP system.
Material control is easy for production runs, R&D material lists and repairs. The process of receiving, issuing and returning material to inventory is facilitated by standard interfaces that are easily learned by material control operators.
Engineering changes to bills of material are facilitated by the "engineering Master" flexible editing capability. The version control for the BOM's can be as detailed or vague as the process designed dictates. One item of a BOM or the entire BOM can be changed quickly and approved for production that day.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
VTA has been extremely unreliable. I would not recommend it. It is not customizable at all. There is no logical way to handle shift differentials which is a huge issue with a company that runs 24/7.
If you do not have a schedule set up, they cannot clock in. This poses a problem for anyone that gets called in on a shift they don't normally work on.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
There is another PSA software program that we have been looking into (DreamFactory) that could potentially replace FinancialForce PSA in our organization. Like FinancialForce PSA, it is cloud based on the force.com platform. Licensing is slightly less than FinancialForce PSA, and the Resource Management tool is far superior to FinancialForce PSA. With that said, our renewal falls in Q4 2014 and I don't foresee us implementing a new system this fiscal year.
Good Technical and Customer Support during and after implementation tasks. Good Project Plan and Management support for implementation and post implementation. Financial functionality could be more comprehensive particularly with Budgeting and Cash Management. Inventory Management capability was adequate but could be more comprehensive as well. "Out of the Box" functionality was adequate but requested add-ons and enhancements seemed to be a bit pricey.
It is maturing and does what it does well although it is not fully complete.
Integration to SF is great.
Gives great visibility to incoming services projects and allows the staffing process to start on pipeline deals.
There are certain processes that take more click-throughs then needed so there are refinement opportunities around the UI.
The resource management screen and project status views have really matured since our original purchase, and while not perfect, allow business leaders to do their jobs.
Configurations vs. customizations. We seem to have to bring in an Apex developer to do a customization for changes I would think could be configuration settings
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Most of the time it is fine. There are peak periods of usage where performance noticably slows down (i.e., Monday mornings when time is due and many reports are being run)
Every time I submit a new help request, whether it's an actual help request or just a question about FinancialForce PSA, I always feel that I'm receiving world class support. The support we receive from FinancialForce PSA is always very detailed and professional. There are some requests that take longer than other for the initial response, which is why I did not give a full 10.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Appirio did a good job, however, the user team didn’t know enough to make all the right configuration/customization choices. The team focused too much on replicating existing processes vs. reengineering them. In hindsight we should have had deep dive reviews at key milestones and enforced more focus on how the software would operate. We didn’t have access to true best practices expertise. In hindsight, a consultant from the outside would have been helpful to drive this.
Could have used more hands-on approach. There are multiple webinars and information sessions but until you actually use the system, these are not very helpful.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
FF PSA is a robust Project Management solution that can be configured to fits any size business. We have tried several other applications and PSA so far has met and exceeded our needs. We run our day to day operations on Salesforce so having a solution that is native was a must have. PSA met that requirement and much more.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We unfortunately did not evaluate any other ERP software. VISUAL was a legacy system and we determined that changing systems would be too difficult, and not cost effective. We reached out to our local VISUAL rep who knew how the software functioned, but not how to apply it more appropriately to our business model, so we continued on with what we had rather than looking elsewhere.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
FinancialForce PSA has helped us improve our data tracking and allows us to get more granular about our financial information and performance.
PSA has given more tools and reports to individual contributors to take greater ownership over their own data, and has increased accountability across the organization.
PSA has added a fairly hefty administrative burden to individuals, project managers, and our financial team.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info