CGM Medisoft vs. SimplePractice

For smaller practices that do not bill insurance, Medisoft may be a bit more than they really need. However, if they desire the ability to track patient appointments and financials all in one place, as well as run detailed reports on practice data, this still may be a good option.

I think it's a good choice for solo providers who bill insurance. If you have employees or are self-pay, go elsewhere, in my opinion

Incentivized

• Medisoft is relatively easy to use.
• There are a lot of customizable features.
• Training users on the product is not a long process because it is intuitive.

Incentivized

• Intake paperwork formatting
• Calendar interface and ease of use
• Automated features such as appointment reminders

Incentivized

• Medisoft is hard to teach to new employees.

Incentivized

• Would like more usability on the app.

Incentivized

I have not had to contact support which is nice. If I have a question, I am typically able to find the answer within the help section.

Incentivized

I prefer Medisoft due to ease of use, functionality and custom report features. In my experience with other software programs I found them to be either less user friendly or lacking in key features that we require for our particular practice.

Also Kalix, Practice Better, Practice Q (formerly Intake Q), Healthie, Jane, etc. I'm hoping to switch to Practice Q soon.

Incentivized

• Medisoft is a good product, but I feel the cost of assurance is too high.
• With all the different components each being billed separately adds up quickly.
• Keeping patient charts/bills up to date is pretty easy.

Incentivized

• The electronic paperwork has established me as a professional in the modern age
• It has allowed me to streamline parts of my group practice
• It has helped me stay organized and keep up with things to be done

Incentivized