Check Point Software Technologies provides threat intelligence via the Check Point ThreatCloud.
N/A
Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Google Threat Intelligence, based on the expertise and service of Mandiant, aims to accelerate security and risk decision making – operational as well as strategic – and to enable security teams to focus on threats that matter to them.
N/A
Pricing
Check Point ThreatCloud
Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Check Point ThreatCloud
Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
—
Priced by company size
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Check Point ThreatCloud
Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)
Considered Both Products
Check Point ThreatCloud
No answer on this topic
Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)
Verified User
Analyst
Chose Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant)
Recorded Future and ThreatQuotient are in the same ballpark when it comes to price. Mandiant Advantage Threat Intelligence had, at the time of use, the best tracking of unclassified threat actors and the best methodology for assessing the overlap between campaigns and actors. …
If you have the Check Point environment and want to utilize the Checkpoint environment, you should use the [Check Point] ThreatCloud. Without [Check Point] ThreatCloud, there’s no way to stop the 0days or APTs. However, [Check Point] ThreatCloud relies on the Checkpoint infrastructure to be used and integrated. If you have other firewall and/or endpoint vendors, [Check Point] ThreatCloud is not the best service to be used. Checkpoint also offers 24x7 threat cloud-managed security services to [...] organizations. Threat cloud-managed security services leverage the threat cloud decreasing the detection time and false-positive rates via increasing protection rates.
Usually SOC leverages Intel from mutiple sources. The scenarios are: 1.Suitable: In large scale SOC where more than 5000 devices are being monitored and the tech stack is wide, Mandiant will play an excellent role in that scenario. 2.Not Suitable: In small scale SOCs wherein limited devices belonging to the same tech stack is being used then the analysts can rely on OSINT and it is not useful to buy the solution.
Mandiant Advantage Threat Intelligence has a very usable platform, with well-differentiated sections for the analyst, as well as the possibility of cross-searching to obtain the desired results. All this is presented with an interface that is easy on the eye and not very messy, which increases productivity and the speed with which work is done.
As Checkpoint next generation firewalls were already implemented in the network, ThreatCloud was easy to implement and had better features and reputation than competitors
It gives more ways to analyze threats and options to fixed it. This device gives more visibility on vulnerability detection and its analysis. It provides detailed reports to have more information of all malwares which help us to increase overall security of our current organization
High score rates [are] seen on breach systems after deploying systems integrated with [Check Point] ThreatCloud
Catch rates are very high compared to other vendors
One missing thing is the detection for localized URLs and IPs
Purchasing within the 3-year perspective is cheap compared to other solutions; ROI is generally six months
[Check Point] ThreatCloud eliminates the need [for] other additional services that may need to be deployed like dedicated IPS, Dedicated Sandbox, DNS solution, etc.