Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) vs. Quest QoreStor
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) provides distributed, resilient, high-performance storage and retrieval of binary large object (blob) data. Object storage is distributed across a cluster of hardware systems, or nodes. The storage cluster is resilient against hard drive failure within a node and against node failure within a cluster. Nodes can be added to or removed from the cluster to adjust cluster capacity as needed. | N/A |
Quest QoreStor | Score8.1 out of 10 | N/A | QoreStor facilitates the adoption of most storage types, uniquely including cloud object storage like native object storage. QoreStor’s advanced compression and deduplication algorithms aim to slash storage requirements and costs anywhere QoreStor is deployed, even in the cloud. QoreStor includes ransomware protection capabilities to protect backup data. QoreStor replaces the Quest DR Series the former Dell / Quest backup and recovery solution, featuring data deduplication. | N/A |
| Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) | Quest QoreStor | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) | Quest QoreStor | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) | Quest QoreStor | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | StarWind Virtual SAN Score9.5 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | StarWind Virtual SAN Score9.5 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | IBM Storage Scale Score9.9 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) | Quest QoreStor | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| Usability | 8.0 | - |
| Support Rating | - | 10.0 |
| Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) | Quest QoreStor | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |



