Cisco Firepower 4100 Series vs Cyberoam

• Application Control.
• URL Filtering.
• Intrusion Prevention.

Read full review

• Easy to use compared to other firewall/UTM products
• Good for SMB and enterprise, but also high marks for a K-12 use case
• Longevity and reliability

Read full review

• Initial install and configuration can be complex.
• May need to learn the new interface if coming from ASA.
• Buggy web interface can at time cause issues.

Read full review

• Without mentioning an alternative brand, there is another leading company who has updated with firewall UI quite a bit. They offer an expanded line-up to meet a wider array of needs including specific appliances for web caching, proxy servers, and other products that have the same and familiar UI across the products. Each of the products does have some overlap so that customers can choose the right appliance for their use case.
• After being acquired by Sophos, we saw our year-over-year costs escalate significantly since our original maintenance contract. They should consider revisiting the pricing, especially for education.
• They should consider a current market analysis and see how the market is changing and adapting with other lower cost appliances for their product line up.

Read full review

• Positive impact would be our increased security network wide.
• Another positive would be the increased processing power, saving us time and [from] needing more equipment.
• A negative impact would be the increased need for having to learn a new interface.

Read full review

• Positive - time and cost savings on management
• Positive - still best in class for ease of CIPA compliance for K-12
• Negative - escalating costs are pushing us away from the solution

Read full review