Great performance and secure connections with Cisco Firepower 4100 Series
Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Firepower 4100 Series
We use Cisco Firepower 4100 Series as the perimetral device for outside connections to the internal network, such as VPN for remote access, VPN L2L, NAT translation for published services and to have full control of who can access the network and what they can do. It is also used as a backup route to the internet.
Pros
- VPN Site to Site
- High Availability / Failover
- Ldap mapping to vpn connections
Cons
- Too much time to deploy changes
- When there are a lot of entries in the ldap mapping the device runs slow
- You can not make config changes via CLI, only via GUI
- Quickly respond to incidents using vpn remote access
- VPN L2L used to establish connections with global providers
- Up to 2000+ vpn access without having performance issues
- Granular access with policy groups based on the AD user
We previously use Cisco ASA 5500 series but due to those devices are a little old, we changed to Cisco Firepower 4100 Series as more recent product from Cisco. One of the reasons to select Cisco Firepower 4100 Series was the configuration migration availability from ASA to Cisco Firepower 4100 Series, making the change a little transparent and not much additional config needed. Once the migration was completed we had the services like VPN RA, VPN L2L, NAT publications working fine and without any problem.
Do you think Cisco Firepower 4100 Series delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Cisco Firepower 4100 Series's feature set?
Yes
Did Cisco Firepower 4100 Series live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Cisco Firepower 4100 Series go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Cisco Firepower 4100 Series again?
No

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation