Cisco Meraki MG vs. ExtremeCloud SD-WAN

Cisco Meraki MG smplifies the route to wireless WAN connectivity and makes cellular a really good uplink option for many networks. MG21 can be used best as gateway to cellular networks, by converting LTE signal from a cellular provider to an ethernet handoff, which can be used as an internet uplink for a variety of use-cases.

Incentivized

Aerohive was ahead of the industry when it came to Wireless network hardware and software. Initially, they were one of the first to offer a solution for a busy office environment with a complicated layout and multiple rooms, open areas, and offices that were spread out. The mesh design of the APS was also one of the first of its kind and has proven to be a great solution within our environment.

Incentivized

• Seamless changeover to LTE (Cellulor network) in times of failure of ethernet connectivity in your company.
• Continuous backup for ethernet. No Downtime experienced.
• It provides you with ability to manage all devices in your network.
• Next generation Firewall, Traffic Shaper and Internet Gateway that is centrally managed on web.

• Easy to navigate management GUI
• Intuitive design
• Helpful troubleshooting tools and logging

Incentivized

• A DHCP configuration would be fine, but a fixed IP configuration seems to require a twist in the configuration.
• If possible, it's just a subscription. With no initials and just a subscription, I think it's a "feature product" that may convince the superior even if the price is a bit high.
• I am happy with wireless and all in one, but I feel that the management screen is old, so I think it is better to renew it a bit more.

Incentivized

• The floor plan design aspect of the software has improved recently and can further be enhanced.
• The software update process for the APs has not always been very straightforward.
• The initial setup and differentiating between the multiple types of APs was a bit confusing.

Incentivized

It does what it is supposed to, with minimal issue!

Incentivized

Although both products come from the same family, there are drastic differences between them. When it comes to the MX, it's all about security. It might not perform like the latter, but the security it provides is really good. It is a good enterprise WAN Solution, but still, the Meraki MG beats it in overall performance & ease of use. And the MX sadly doesn't support cellular connectivity.

Incentivized

We also considered both Cisco and Juniper, but Extreme Networks Wireless WAN met our budgetary and technology needs the best.

Incentivized

I really think that Cisco Meraki MG is an excellent product that can be used in any part of the organization when you need a backup uplink solution. As it is managed from the Meraki Cloud it is easy to integrate with your enterprise and any other platform you have in.

Incentivized

• The ROI is excellent, over time we have been able to avoid outages even though our WAN provider may have had issues, the switch to LTE via Cisco Meraki MGwas smooth
• in locations where traditional lan links were not feasible, like mobile locations, this has been a saver
• they can be placed where mobile phone reception is best without LAN

Incentivized

• The speed of our Wireless network has significantly improved.
• The range of the network covers our entire user area, simply due to the power and range of the APs as well as the mesh network capabilities.
• The capability of the software to configure, monitor, and alert based on network traffic and user behavior is almost unmatched.

Incentivized