Cisco Meraki MG vs. HPE OfficeConnect

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco Meraki MG
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Cisco Meraki MG cellular gateways are a cloud managed WAN solution designed to seamlessly transpose a wireless cellular signal to wired Ethernet, providing primary or failover connectivity.N/A
HPE OfficeConnect
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Hewlett-Packard Enterprise (HPE) offers the OfficeConnect line of access points and wireless solutions.N/A
Pricing
Cisco Meraki MGHPE OfficeConnect
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco Meraki MGHPE OfficeConnect
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco Meraki MGHPE OfficeConnect
Best Alternatives
Cisco Meraki MGHPE OfficeConnect
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN
Score 9.3 out of 10
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Meraki MGHPE OfficeConnect
Likelihood to Recommend
9.6
(16 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.3
(16 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Meraki MGHPE OfficeConnect
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
Definitely well-suited for a backup for a retail environment. We have had to use it as a primary internet connection when our fiber wasn't brought in in time and we had no issues with it running. It was able to withstand the temporary load on it until we were able to get the circuit provided.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
The PoE function works well, and I am using them to power some VoIP/SIP phones of various brands and vintages (Nortel, Mitel, LG-Nortel). The setup is easiest, no special training/knowledge is required. You can manage internal as well as guest networks using the app.
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
  • Seamless changeover to LTE (Cellulor network) in times of failure of ethernet connectivity in your company.
  • Continuous backup for ethernet. No Downtime experienced.
  • It provides you with ability to manage all devices in your network.
  • Next generation Firewall, Traffic Shaper and Internet Gateway that is centrally managed on web.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • Good Switch
  • Perfect for SMB
  • Perfect for VOIP scenarios
Read full review
Cons
Cisco
  • A DHCP configuration would be fine, but a fixed IP configuration seems to require a twist in the configuration.
  • If possible, it's just a subscription. With no initials and just a subscription, I think it's a "feature product" that may convince the superior even if the price is a bit high.
  • I am happy with wireless and all in one, but I feel that the management screen is old, so I think it is better to renew it a bit more.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • Not all ports are PoE
  • Reset Button is delicate, sometimes too delicate.
  • Mounting brackets could be designed better.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cisco
It does what it is supposed to, with minimal issue!
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
We checked many vendors. ALU was a primary contender. However, their acccess points are not primarily designed for cellular use case. Cellular is just an additional feature on their fully loaded APs. The fact that MEraki MG is suited for this particular use case was a major factor.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
I think both are great products but HPE OfficeConnect has been more reliable and suits our budget. As HPE claims, it's one of their simplest products and if you're an SMB, this is the best option.
Read full review
Scalability
Cisco
In terms of scalability, The MG Meraki is unvanquished! As it works on cellular signals, as long as you have the required signal strength, you are connected. Removes the dependency on cables to connect to our ISP. So geographical locations do not affect the scalability of MG. Which is the whole point of having a Cellular to Wired Ethernet Device. And it can also be managed with the web centrally.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • The ROI is excellent, over time we have been able to avoid outages even though our WAN provider may have had issues, the switch to LTE via Cisco Meraki MGwas smooth
  • in locations where traditional lan links were not feasible, like mobile locations, this has been a saver
  • they can be placed where mobile phone reception is best without LAN
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • The network latency has dropped by 50%.
  • The cost has been reduced little bit.
Read full review
ScreenShots