Cisco Multicloud Defense vs. FireMon

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco Multicloud Defense
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
A solution to simplify security and gain multidirectional protection across any public or private cloud to block inbound attacks, lateral movement, and data exfiltration using a single solution. Cisco Multicloud Defense protects all cloud environments using a single software-as-a-service (SaaS) control plane, eliminating inefficient, complex, and costly point solutions.N/A
FireMon
Score 7.9 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
FireMon is a real-time security policy management solution built for today’s complex multi-vendor, enterprise environments. Supporting the latest firewall and policy enforcement technologies spanning on-premises networks to the cloud, FireMon delivers visibility and control across the entire IT landscape to automate policy changes, meet compliance standards, to minimize policy-related risk. Since creating their policy management solution in 2004, FireMon states they've helped…N/A
Pricing
Cisco Multicloud DefenseFireMon
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco Multicloud DefenseFireMon
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco Multicloud DefenseFireMon
Features
Cisco Multicloud DefenseFireMon
Cloud Computing Security Features
Comparison of Cloud Computing Security Features features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Multicloud Defense
8.2
4 Ratings
2% above category average
FireMon
-
Ratings
Automated Data Backup and Recovery8.22 Ratings00 Ratings
Intrusion Detection and Prevention:7.84 Ratings00 Ratings
Regular Vulnerability Management8.22 Ratings00 Ratings
Identity and Access Management7.82 Ratings00 Ratings
Secure Data Transfer8.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Security Incident Response8.43 Ratings00 Ratings
Compliance and Auditing8.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cisco Multicloud DefenseFireMon
Small Businesses
Armor
Armor
Score 6.0 out of 10
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.5 out of 10
Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.5 out of 10
Cisco Meraki MX
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Multicloud DefenseFireMon
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(6 ratings)
7.9
(69 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
6.8
(7 ratings)
Usability
9.1
(2 ratings)
7.3
(3 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.7
(17 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
7.9
(48 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Multicloud DefenseFireMon
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
For WAF functionality and delivery of websites, It's very well suited for traditional firewalling, if you're doing that already, it can be quite difficult to rearchitect everything around this product. So an example of that would be if, like us, you came from a datacenter style architecture within your cloud environment and you are trying to move to a more cloud-fronted architecture. Probably the best way to put it is that can be quite difficult, but once you've deployed, it gets easier operationally. So to kind of reverse engineer everything and then do everything again can be quite tedious in some ways. But that will be specific to people depending on where they're coming from with it.
Read full review
FireMon
FireMon is best used in a large environment (for example, I have >100
firewalls in my environment). It's best used when trying to improve
security posture and showing changes in firewall security over time. It
might not be the best choice for smaller environments or those that aren't concerned about security management.
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
  • DLP monitoring - key item for us which helps to view if anything which should leave our environment our or even between each part of network between/inside specific clouds
  • Segmentation of subnet, basic but helpful to isolate each host into their own part of single subnet and connect them, including all visibility features which are offered by Cisco defense systems
  • Allow/deny rules helps us to block, monitor and logs traffic passing in each direction of our environment
Read full review
FireMon
  • Give good real time reporting for anyone making a change to any of our firewalls
  • Provides good reporting tools that are out of box
  • Provide good customization tools that is specific to our needs
  • Upgrades are a simple process and support does relatively well with assisting us.
Read full review
Cons
Cisco
  • The ability to see traffic flowing and identify malicious traffic is amazing.
  • The ease of setting up the connections of the cloud platforms is perfect.
  • Dynamic based security policies allow for better protection.
  • I don't have any detailed examples of improvement so instead I highlighted a couple of aspects that make the solution amazing.
Read full review
FireMon
  • Some features could be added to the existing functionality which include NAT rules usage
  • Rule expiration normalization from firewalls rather than entering them in rule documentation
  • .csv exports of the files from the firewall pane only gives usage for 30 days by default and that should be increased
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cisco
If it maintains its current direction it will be very disruptive in the cloud security space
Read full review
FireMon
The shell is locked out and we can't run any general centos commands. The implementation and maintainence of the arch is very complex. Even with the right identifiers on log messages the log collection keeps failing. The warning messages on the device are ambiguous. The log messages on firemon are a bit confusing and don't show the exact issue.
Read full review
Usability
Cisco
Ease of Use
Read full review
FireMon
It save me time and I'm able to have the review - review the rule independently with using my time.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Cisco
No answers on this topic
FireMon
FireMon has been relatively stable overall. However, there have been a handful of times where we had issues with the console. For example, we couldn't update which devices to include in a security assessment. The initial suggestion from support was to just reboot it. It seems like there weren't many other options available such as to restart services before going to the extreme of a complete reboot.
Read full review
Performance
Cisco
No answers on this topic
FireMon
I'm not sure we have the largest implementation of FireMon out there but we do have a few 1000 devices being probed by FireMon. Overall, the system's performance has been rock solid. The console refreshes quickly and reports are generated within an expected timeframe.
Read full review
Support Rating
Cisco
As of yet I havent logged a TAC case - It will be interesting to see how it is supported as a new product in the medium term
Read full review
FireMon
FireMon technical support is awesome! They respond quickly to our requests and they are well trained and very knowledgeable about the tool. Some issues have to be referred to the development team, but technical support largely provides solutions for any issues that we may have.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Cisco
No answers on this topic
FireMon
Implementation is fairly simple. Most issues can be resolved by referencing manuals.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
Cisco Multicloud Defense, Crowd Strike Falcon, and Arctic Wolf Cloud Posture Security Management System as a service SAAS platforms are very comparable platforms. Unfortunately for Croud Strike, they had a mishap recently that caused major downtime for many companies worldwide. I do not think that you would have to worry about this happening with Cisco Multicloud Defense.
Read full review
FireMon
I has worked with AlgoSec and while they are very similar product, I find the FireMon is easier to understand and get rolling with. While both require some learning, FireMon is by far the easier one. Once you have an understanding of how things are arranged and labeled you can easily import firewalls and begin to work on them to improve them
Read full review
Scalability
Cisco
No answers on this topic
FireMon
Firemon Is easily scalable and maintainable with any size team. Although it requires some tech debt, it is well worth the time to invest to ensure compliance is visible and reports are accurate. Although our environment is very large we do not fully utilize the scalability of the Firemon product.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • The insight that it provides allows us to move away from other tools and just utilize the Cisco Multicloud Defense.
  • Insights into data usage provides tangible analytics.
  • Ease of management and use allows for less in-depth and specialized training.
Read full review
FireMon
  • FireMon's Compliance Reporting provided an immediate and tangible benefit
  • FireMon helps identify egregious or erroneous rules quickly across multiple platforms
  • FireMon took our audit process from an Excel spreadsheet into a far more advanced process with readily available context for reviewers
Read full review
ScreenShots