Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense vs. FileWall
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense | Score9.3 out of 10 | N/A | Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense provides protection against email threats that compromise an organization’s brand and operations. Its advanced threat detection capabilities uncover known, emerging and targeted threats. And it expands the scope of organizations' defenses to detect dangerous threats and rapidly search for and remediate threats across security controls. Secure Email Threat Defense's Artificial Intelligence and machine… | N/A |
FileWall | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | odix - a provider of Enterprise CDR (Content Disarm and Reconstruction), is now offering its own native application for securing Microsoft Office 365 mailboxes. CDR technology is a detection-less method to disarm zero-days and Windows Defender (formerly APT)’s in files, that the vendor says is considered by leading analysts as an addition or replacement to existing anti-malware technologies. FileWall™ is designed to run in conjunction with existing Microsoft security solutions such as EOP and… | $2.40 per month per user |
| Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense | FileWall | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense | FileWall | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 28 Answers | 100% Would buy again 8 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 28 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 8 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 28 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 8 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 24 Answers | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 7 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 23 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 8 Answers | |
| Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense | FileWall | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Secure Email Gateway |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense | FileWall | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Sophos Email Score8.9 out of 10 | Sophos Email Score8.9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Barracuda ESG (discontinued) Score6.2 out of 10 | Barracuda ESG (discontinued) Score6.2 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | ![]() Microsoft Exchange Score8.6 out of 10 | ![]() Microsoft Exchange Score8.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense | FileWall | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.8 | 9.4 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 5.0 | - |
| Usability | 9.0 | 9.4 |
| Availability | 9.0 | - |
| Performance | 7.3 | - |
| Support Rating | 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Implementation Rating | 9.0 | - |
| Ease of integration | 9.0 | - |
| Product Scalability | 9.1 | - |
| Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense | FileWall | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
|
|
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Screenshots | FileWall Screenshots |









