Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Trellix Endpoint Security ENS

Trellix Endpoint Security ENS

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Cisco Secure Endpoint	Score 8.8 out of 10	N/A	Cisco Secure Endpoint is a comprehensive, cloud-managed endpoint security solution designed to protect devices from advanced malware and cyber threats throughout the entire attack lifecycle—before, during, and after an attack. It offers powerful prevention capabilities to identify and stop threats before they compromise your systems, using multifaceted techniques including risk-based vulnerability management and posture assessments. The solution provides deep visibility and advanced detection…	N/A
Trellix Endpoint Security ENS	Score 8.2 out of 10	N/A	Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) solutions apply proactive threat intelligence and defenses across the entire attack lifecycle to keep organizations safer and more resilient.	N/A

Pricing

Cisco Secure Endpoint

Trellix Endpoint Security ENS

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Cisco Secure Endpoint	Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Pricing Info

Community Pulse
	Cisco Secure Endpoint	Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
Considered Both Products	Cisco Secure Endpoint Verified User Anonymous Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Cisco Secure Endpoint integrates better with other Cisco security portfolio products. Incentivized Helpful? TJ Tuafiq John Engineer Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR), Symantec Endpoint Security and Securden Endpoint Privilege Manager Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint As a Cisco partner, it’s mostly my first choice. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Cisco Secure Endpoint was on par with other industry leaders at a lower cost while also living within an existing client on our end-user systems. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Webroot Antivirus + Internet Security Complete (SecureAnywhere) and Veem Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Integration with the rest of the Cisco security stack made Cisco Secure Endpoint the right product. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Microsoft Defender XDR Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Because of the Cisco ecosystem Incentivized Helpful? FM Florentino Martinez Gragera IT speialist Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Cisco Umbrella Incentivized Helpful? RA Reggie Abernethy Senior Network System Administrator Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Cisco Secure Endpoint is easier to deploy and use versus Trend Micro Deep Security. The interface is less intuitive (possibly subjective) when compared to Cisco Secure Endpoint, which required more training for support staff. Also the integration is not as good with Trend. … Incentivized Helpful? JB Jono Bundu Head of IT Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Other products we use were, I think, well, nothing like Cisco Endpoint. There was Microsoft Defender. I think Sophos and CrowdStrike. I think the visibility and the security. We haven't had any issues with the system. Once it's been implemented, it works fine. The enhancements … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Cisco Secure Endpoint provides better overall support and detection compared to other products used. Strong visibility and a strong range of tools when researching an issue to find either information or resolution. Dashboards are also a lot cleaner than most products and easier … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint I was not part of the selection process but know this was purchased on a suite of tools. We get so much more from MDE, CSE doesn’t compare. Incentivized Helpful? Chris Goodhue Network Security Specialist Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Best tool if you have a heavy Cisco product suite for Intergrations. Send data to our SIEM (QRADAR) well and is easy to deploy with our SCCM. The groups and polices are helpful to customize protection for different endpoint needs. Incentivized Helpful? Scott Quimby VP & CTO, CISSP Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Huntress is evaluating endpoints from a different perspective. SentinelOne would be an alternative product. Cisco Secure Endpoint always shows up reasonably close to SentinelOne in overall protection. SentinelOne does offer a SOC option which dramatically adds to the … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint No participate of the selection Incentivized Helpful? JC Jeff Collins Network Administrator Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Cisco Secure Endpoint provides much more protection, reporting, and features than Microsoft defender did for us. Incentivized Helpful? LM Licia Matthew Digital Strategist Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Compared to most competitors, Cisco Secure Endpoint is affordable and offers better protection in features. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Cisco Secure Endpoint works in tandem with Cisco Umbrella, which allows to even further improve the overall security of the systems. Incentivized Helpful? sitaram gurjar System Administrator Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint We were using McAfee but the performance was not good and it consume a high memory. Cisco secure endpoint is very advanced and very lightweight for organizations. The configuration and management are very easy and centralized. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint The integration with all the other Cisco platforms made AMP a clear front-runner. Crowdstrike and Sophos had no integration at all and Palo Alto required their firewalls be deployed. Again, as a Cisco Security customer, it made complete sense to leverage their AMP technology. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Compared to Malwarebytes Enterprise, AMP is significantly harder to configure, update, implement, use. The overall burden that AMP puts on the IT department is rather high. Incentivized Helpful? Randy Zuehlke IT Security Manager Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Cisco Secure Endpoint is an advanced EDR solution that is highly effective and scalable. Our experience previously with MalwareBytes and Microsoft Defender was not horrible, but these products were not as effective and did not integrate well with our other security products to … Incentivized Helpful? Oleksandr Tsapenko IT Project Manager Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Cisco Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) for Endpoints is one of a wide spectrum of Cisco security products and is the first step that can bring you to start using Cisco AnyConnect and Cisco ISE to integrate with them. Incentivized Helpful? Sebastián Sarasate Infrastructure Manager Chose Cisco Secure Endpoint Being all products of a similar nature, Cisco Advance Malware Protection stands out for its simplicity, low resource consumption, reporting, work dashboards and integration with the rest of the already installed suit. Those are the most notable aspects, although the rest of the … Incentivized Helpful?	Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Trellix Endpoint Security ENS interfaces better with other tools and is simpler to use. provides wider endpoint protection and more centralized control than SentinelOne's automatic response. Trellix Endpoint Security ENS preserves McAfee's dependability while offering newer … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS At the time we took the decision all other products seemed to be complicated in usage and licensing. Trellix was very simple in all the aspects: licensing, usage, support. It also was very simple to deploy, setup and manage. Product interface was simple to understand and even … Incentivized Helpful? JC Jensen Concepcion IT head Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS All in one protection for endpoint devices, the data loss prevention, and adaptive threat protection is the best advantage against other competitors. The cost for the platform and service is very effective and efficient. The usage and capability of this software is very edge … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Unlike Trellix Endpoint Security Symantec Endpoint provides less information about events on the user side. Trellix give an opportunity to see information about virus detection on a user machine as quick as it possible, so we were able to catch the signs of virus propagation … Incentivized Helpful? Junior Pierre-Toussaint Senior Information Technology Security Officer Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS i've evaluated a few different solution but from different needs Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS FireEye Endpoint Security is my favorite EDR tool. It's a single pane of glass that fits nicely into the Helix and NX platforms. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS It has fewer false positive issues. It also provides more compatibility with a variety of different OS versions. The sensor installation is easy to use, update and maintain as well as the reporting capabilities that it can offer are more robust than the ones that other … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Compared to its competitors like Cisco, McAfee is cheaper. At the competitive pricing levels, McAfee Endpoint Security does a good job. Although it stacks up finely against decent priced solutions but it doesn't provide superior service if the price limit is scaled down or up. … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Compared to Endgame and AMP, McAfee Endpoint Security doesn't hold a candle to them when it comes to detecting/advanced identifying malware or zero days. Since Mcafee Endpoint Security is signature-based, it is way behind the curve with newer anti-malware tools that can focus … Incentivized Helpful? TP Tanish Pruthi Marketing Associate Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS We were using Microsoft Defender in the beginning as it was free and quite good. But as we got acquired by a large MNC, we were asked to switch to McAfee as we had to follow the company guidelines which takes data security very seriously and personally. I think the switch did … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS The solution is already in place when I join the organization. I do not have any information on what other antivirus software they evaluated before decided to purchase McAfee Endpoint Security. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS McAfee is a strong, if not strongest A/V solution in the endpoint security space. It's wide adoption and strong support and positive reviews from companies like Gartner and Forrester back it up. Incentivized Helpful? Ralf Richter Senior Solution Architect Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS If you have Cisco tools and equipment globally in place and just for the clients additionally McAfee you should have a deeper look. We wanted to install end-2-end security over all networks and hardware. This was a big point for Cisco. For a managed client team, Cisco is a step … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS McAfee Endpoint Security has a better GUI, better pricing, stronger features, and agent deployment is much faster. Their firewall is extremely good, and for those reasons I would firmly recommend it over other solutions (Kaspersky, Symantec etc). Like I mentioned earlier, do … Incentivized Helpful? Dharma raju DevOps Engineer/Linux Admin Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS McAfee Endpoint Security provides a single platform for Firewall, AV and web control. With the new console and integration between the components, threat detection is superior. Incentivized Helpful? Tom Parker Remote Facilities Systems Support Analyst Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Trend Micro is a better solution in our environment. It is easier to manage and seems to do a better job. Incentivized Helpful? Christopher "Scott" Pandolfo Security Specialist Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS McAfee is a cheaper price point, however Kaspersky out performs McAfee in every category. We went with McAfee, because many of the team members in IT were familar with it, less training (short term), and lower cost (short term) Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Advanced Threat Protection, or ATP in Office 365 was awful. Some attachments wouldn't be delivered at all while others took minutes and sometimes hours to be delivered after being scanned. It was causing us to lose business. FireEye processes attachments in less than 60 seconds … Incentivized Helpful? Roberta Jones IT Administrative Specialist Chose Trellix Endpoint Security ENS We only selected McAfee because we are already using ESET NOD32 for the protection of our desktops and laptops. We didn't want to use the same software for our servers so we chose McAfee instead. I personally like ESET Smart Security better than McAfee when deploying it on a … Incentivized Helpful?

Features

Cisco Secure Endpoint

Trellix Endpoint Security ENS

Endpoint Security

Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
	Cisco Secure Endpoint 9.1 Ratings 6% above category average	Trellix Endpoint Security ENS 8.3 Ratings 3% below category average
Anti-Exploit Technology	9.40 Ratings	8.00 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)	9.40 Ratings	8.00 Ratings
Centralized Management	9.20 Ratings	9.00 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support	8.50 Ratings	7.90 Ratings
Infection Remediation	9.10 Ratings	8.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management	9.10 Ratings	8.00 Ratings
Malware Detection	9.40 Ratings	9.00 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Cisco Secure Endpoint	Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
Small Businesses	ThreatLocker Score 9.1 out of 10	ThreatLocker Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.0 out of 10	CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises	BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management Score 10.0 out of 10	BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management Score 10.0 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Cisco Secure Endpoint	Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
Likelihood to Recommend	8.8 (0 ratings)	9.0 (0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	4.5 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Usability	8.9 (0 ratings)	8.0 (0 ratings)
Availability	7.3 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Support Rating	9.2 (0 ratings)	5.0 (0 ratings)
Implementation Rating	4.5 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Ease of integration	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Cisco Secure Endpoint	Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
Likelihood to Recommend	To handle modern cyber threats such as malware, ransomware, and other known and unknown threats, Cisco Secure Endpoint is a handy option because it is EDR-capable, always updated, and effectively hunts for threats and blocks them before they cause harm to the business. It is reliable, and I recommend it because it has always protected our business from cyber threats. Incentivized SZ Siham Ziyane Network Admin Read full review	During the pandemic all our users worked remotely that was challenging from security perspective, so we had to deploy the endpoint protection system with cloud based monitoring server. By doing that we were able to keep safety for users workspaces even though some of them did not connect to VPN for a long time Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Threat identification: it finds things we wouldn't have even been looking for. Integration with Secure Malware Analytics for automatic submission of suspicious files. In-depth and complex configuration options for finely tuned policies for different users and endpoints. Part of the Cisco Secure Client product for easier distribution and reduction of running agents on end-user devices Integrates with Secure-X for single-pane of glass view of dashboards. Incentivized Nate Haleen Lead Developer Read full review	Provides high fidelity alerting. Allows CSOC analysts to perform forensic triage and alert investigations through containment from a single pane of glass. Provides alert telemetry across on-disk and in-memory attacks. Supports many additional 'bolt-on' modules to provide additional alert context or capabilities. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	Frequent name changes are not helpful Some of the reports that get sent are very high-end reports with lots of information. It would be nice if there was a simplified report that could be sent automatically when an issue is identified on a computer Incentivized JM Jeremy Miller Director of Technology Read full review	My biggest flak with McAfee Endpoint Security is that it is quite resource-intensive. It does tend to make the system a little slow. You get security at the expense of your machine's speed. Even though the drive encryption makes the system more secure, it takes a lot of time to first enter the very long password, and then for it to decrypt the whole machine. This sometimes clashes with Windows update and causes a lot of complications which leads to boot loops. Incentivized TP Tanish Pruthi Marketing Associate Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	the renewal must be studied with different factors Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Usability	AMP is very difficult to use compared to other products we've seen. It's hard to understand why there are so many different logins for the various products that supposedly integrate with AMP. We had weekly phone calls for months to implement the product yet none of the IT department really enjoys using this product or feels comfortable with the accuracy of detections. The number of false positives is high. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	So below is my breakdown, Pro's: Centralized Management, Comprehensive Protection and customization. Con's: Initial cost Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Reliability and Availability	no complain and no issue with availability Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Support Rating	In terms of technical support for Cisco Secure Endpoint, the support has been pretty good. All the cases I submitted were solved in a reasonable time frame, and it was a good experience. However, I find that not as many vendors have the expertise I would expect. Incentivized JC Jeff Collins Network Administrator Read full review	The support is pretty good, and I haven't had any issues with getting the highest quality technical support when there are issues. Tech support representatives that I have dealt with know the product quite well and have solved many issues that I have had with the product in the past. The only issue I have with support is that it can be quite expensive. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Implementation Rating	no participation in implementation Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	Other products we use were, I think, well, nothing like Cisco Endpoint. There was Microsoft Defender. I think Sophos and CrowdStrike. I think the visibility and the security. We haven't had any issues with the system. Once it's been implemented, it works fine. The enhancements that come into play, we're benefiting from them. We're benefiting from the Telos threat intel, which is really good as well Incentivized JB Jono Bundu Head of IT Read full review	We only selected McAfee because we are already using ESET NOD32 for the protection of our desktops and laptops. We didn't want to use the same software for our servers so we chose McAfee instead. I personally like ESET Smart Security better than McAfee when deploying it on a desktop or laptop because I think it protects the PC better. When it comes to web protection, policy updates, etc., McAfee is the better choice and that's why we deployed it on our servers. Incentivized Roberta Jones IT Administrative Specialist Read full review
Return on Investment	Cisco Secure Endpoint increases visibility into threats on our endpoints, thereby reducing the risk of threat infestation. By automatically responding to threats, the tool protects our data and workforce in a timely manner. It includes reporting features that help our teams investigate threats more thoroughly and take appropriate action. Incentivized JL John Lopez IT Specialist Read full review	This tool helped us in delegating the asset safety responsibility to the client level by 80%, leaving 20% for the management console. With a decent pricing, the benefits are slightly above expectations. The ROI is good. But, considering most of the malware comes from internet, with a good email security appliance and next gen firewall in place, the online security alerts are now redundant. It could be something that can be termed as overkill on the budget. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots		Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Screenshots