Claris FileMaker vs. Toad Database Developer Tools

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Claris FileMaker
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
Claris' FileMaker is presented as a Workplace Innovation Platform, and is used to create a custom app. Manual processes can be automated with Claris FileMaker Pro, and apps can be created to manage contacts, track inventory, organize projects, etc.
$21
per month per user
Toad Database Developer Tools
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Toad by Quest is a database management toolset that database developers, administrators and data analysts use to simplify workflows, create code free from defects, automate frequent or repetitive processes, and minimize risks. Editions include Toad for Oracle, which automates administration tasks and helps proactively manage databases while embracing performance optimization and risk mitigation. Similar editions exist for IBM DB2, SQL Server, SAP, or MySQL and Postgres environments (Toad Edge).
$229
per year
Pricing
Claris FileMakerToad Database Developer Tools
Editions & Modules
Platform Subscription
$21
per month per user
Individual desktop license
$594
one-time fee
Toad Edge For MySQL
$229
per year
Toad Edge For Postgres
$229
per year
Toad for SQL - Pro Edition
$437
per year
Toad for Oracle - Base Edition
$550
per year
Toad for DB2 z/OS - Base Edition
$636
per year
Toad for SAP - Base Edition
$636
per year
Toad for SQL - Xpert Edition
$763
per year
Toad for Oracle - Professional Edition
$829
per year
Toad for SQL - Dev Edition
$930
per year
Toad for DB2 z/OS - Pro Edition
$996
per year
Toad for Oracle - Professional DB Admin Edition
$1,370
per year
Toad for DB2 z/OS - Xpert Edition
$1,529
per year
Toad for SAP - Xpert Edition
$1530
per year
Toad for Oracle - Xpert Plus Edition
$1,753
per year
Toad for DB2 z/OS - Dev Edition
$1,861
per year
Toad for SAP - Dev Edition
$1863
per year
Toad for SAP - Xpert+ Edition
$2099
per year
Toad for SAP - DBA Edition
$3661
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Claris FileMakerToad Database Developer Tools
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Claris FileMakerToad Database Developer Tools
Considered Both Products
Claris FileMaker

No answer on this topic

Toad Database Developer Tools
Chose Toad Database Developer Tools
Toad Database Developer Tools was recommended to me by my outside programming team, I thought it was ideal for my needs and I have been using it for many years. Point being, I have not had the need to use or evaluate other tools.
Features
Claris FileMakerToad Database Developer Tools
Low-Code Development
Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Product A and Product B
Claris FileMaker
8.1
4 Ratings
4% below category average
Toad Database Developer Tools
-
Ratings
Visual Modeling8.14 Ratings00 Ratings
Drag-and-drop Interfaces4.43 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Security9.73 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform User Management7.94 Ratings00 Ratings
Reusability8.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Scalability9.54 Ratings00 Ratings
Database Development
Comparison of Database Development features of Product A and Product B
Claris FileMaker
-
Ratings
Toad Database Developer Tools
8.5
32 Ratings
0% above category average
Version control tools00 Ratings8.918 Ratings
Test data generation00 Ratings6.025 Ratings
Performance optimization tools00 Ratings9.030 Ratings
Schema maintenance00 Ratings9.029 Ratings
Database change management00 Ratings9.528 Ratings
Database Administration
Comparison of Database Administration features of Product A and Product B
Claris FileMaker
-
Ratings
Toad Database Developer Tools
9.1
32 Ratings
12% above category average
User management00 Ratings9.030 Ratings
Database security00 Ratings9.028 Ratings
Database status reporting00 Ratings9.529 Ratings
Change management00 Ratings9.022 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Claris FileMakerToad Database Developer Tools
Small Businesses
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.0 out of 10
DBeaver
DBeaver
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
ER/Studio
ER/Studio
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.0 out of 10
ER/Studio
ER/Studio
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Claris FileMakerToad Database Developer Tools
Likelihood to Recommend
7.7
(51 ratings)
9.5
(34 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.0
(7 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
8.8
(8 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Availability
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(6 ratings)
8.2
(7 ratings)
In-Person Training
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
5.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Claris FileMakerToad Database Developer Tools
Likelihood to Recommend
Claris
If your company is really small, I can understand the need for a product like this. However, I would go for MS Access... FileMaker Pro can not be integrated with other systems (like MS Access can at least be handled by C# for instance, and can be integrated with MS Excel or even SQL server). I'm really not sure in what scenario one would choose for FileMaker Pro. If your application or company grows bigger, you're going to have a problem to move to another environment. Also, the fact that only one person can work with the backend at any given time is a problem in a somewhat larger company.
Read full review
Quest Software
Toad for Oracle is very well suited for all Oracle implementations, be it single instance or RAC. It is best suited for use of Oracle DBA, Developer and Database Engineers. I don't recommend Toad for Oracle for Project Managers or Solution Architects. This can be a pricier choice for these people. They can do fine with free options like SQL Developer.
Read full review
Pros
Claris
  • The relational database management system makes the program highly customizable to fit the needs of any product. You can add a ton of information to each record and update your inventory on a regular basis with an Excel import or manually inside of the record. It has the capability to incorporate barcoding, which can manage your available inventory with ease.
  • The scripting language allows FileMaker to automatically calculate complex algorithms automatically or generate report outs with the click of a button. This allows for greater UI, especially with active users who are not familiar with writing code. Almost all of our internal data is linked to the FileMaker database
  • The server license allows many users to update the database in real time, which is handy if your inventory is constantly changing. We have users with Macs, PCs, iPhones and handheld tablets linked to our FileMaker database and they are updating the information constantly throughout the day.
  • If you invest some time into formatting and scripting the database, there is a high ease of use for users without knowledge of any programming or FileMaker itself.
Read full review
Quest Software
  • Toad is a de-facto standard tool for data developers and analysts. Generally speaking it provides almost every function needed to manage data in EDW with great performance and stability.
  • The nature of clinical data is big-sized: one table may have billions of rows. Toad provides critical functions to manage SQLs, e.g. Top SQL that can monitor and manage SQLs using CPU power and network bandwidth, so that EDW administrator can optimize ETL operations in the best efficiency.
  • Many of our data analysts are not computer science backgrounded (having clinical / nursing background). Toad provides great auditing tools such as Tuning Lab or SQL Scanner, so that data analysts can train themselves with guidance of the tool.
Read full review
Cons
Claris
  • Developer features need to be beefed up - namely adding the ability to search code for a phrase or keyword and the ability to do the same in the "relationship graph" in the database.
  • Add ability for users to edit the same table record at the same time by version control.
  • Allow Filemaker Server to use more than 1 core; currently multi-processing is not supported and it can be tricky to find just the right server to support the application you've built to the fullest capacity.
Read full review
Quest Software
  • The power and control it gives is at the same time kind of a negative thing. There's too many options available, even when you don't need them. For simple database operations it's sometimes easier to just use SQL Developer since navigation is way more intuitive and easy.
  • Related with the above: there is a steep learning curve. However, since this is the main tool for any Oracle developer, this is not that much of a problem.
  • If I remember well, Toad used to be free, some 20 years ago. Or at least had a free version. It would be nice to have a free version. The dedicated Oracle developers and DBA's won't use the free version, but all the rest of us developers might use it instead of SQL Developer. It would make communications between everybody somewhat easier.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Claris
It it not really up to me but my opinion does have some weight in the decision and the reason I would renew my use FileMaker Pro 8.5 is because I am finally getting used to it! Now that I have been working with the program, tasks have become quicker and projects are getting done faster. File Maker Pro 8.5 really is a versatile tool and I think we are just scratching the surface with it's abilities.
Read full review
Quest Software
It is the preferred tool for our organization.
Read full review
Usability
Claris
It's almost what it should be after so may years and with Apple's longevity and strength behind it. For people who earn their living based on efficiency I think there are too many developer obstacles that waste time and therefore money.
Read full review
Quest Software
I give is an 8 because nothing is a 10 and there is always room for improvement. I believe the user who is not as technologically inclined would be better suited with an easier way to identify the options for setting the layout up for Toad's GUI. To some it is very cumbersome and confusing.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Claris
mostly never issues and if there are they are resolved fast
Read full review
Quest Software
No answers on this topic
Performance
Claris
for the most part but lots of error messages if you type something h correctly
Read full review
Quest Software
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Claris
The forums are great with lots of helpful experts and the staff monitor them to provide help where needed. There have been a couple of unique technical issues I've had to deal with that I haven't been able to get resolved so I chose to score this a 9 instead of a 10.
Read full review
Quest Software
I give the overall support for Toad for Oracle a 10/10. This is because whenever there has been an issue with this software, our team has got an immediate response. The same can not be said for similar software. The most recent example of this is when we needed to renew our licenses. Some employees were unable to log in to code with the given license key. Support was able to resolve the issue quickly.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Claris
easy to follow along and was able to jump in right away
Read full review
Quest Software
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Claris
Suggest you use an iterative R.A.D. or AGILE development approach. (i.e. rather than writing a gigantic spec for a system, then building it). FileMaker facilitates quick prototypes. Developing an example, then allowing users to "try it out" is a snap.
Read full review
Quest Software
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Claris
FileMaker is still the quickest way to go from zero to having a minimum viable working solution. Simple solutions can be built in as little as a afternoon of development. It is the only tool I am aware of which allows tech savy end users with domain knowledge to build bespoke apps for their businesses without undertaking professional software development training.
Read full review
Quest Software
Toad is much better than Tableau query writer. Tableau is not intuitive and requires knowledge of proprietary database language to fully implement. Tableau does not perform as quickly and accurately as Toad. Toad is very easy and slim to install. Additional hardware is often required to run Tableau smoothly. Support for Tableau is even more expensive than Toad support.
Read full review
Scalability
Claris
it's most definitely does as we are a unique business to use this for scholarship awarding
Read full review
Quest Software
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Claris
  • We are a more agile company because of FileMaker. A few of us who are tech-savvy enough to manage the database (but are not professional developers) can make needed adjustments to our database without having to employ an in-house developer or contract with a 3rd party. As our business processes evolve and change, it's easy to update the database to accommodate those changes.
Read full review
Quest Software
  • Quick and easy query development helps reduce man-hours in a project which converts to real dollars.
  • Query analysis and tuning result in low database overhead and low latency, thus translating into real dollars because a system can thus handle more requests from customers.
  • Ease of use makes it easy to deploy greenhorns in projects with minimal training, thus helping save money. Otherwise menial and simple jobs would have required experienced DBAs.
Read full review
ScreenShots