Clio Draft vs. Responsive

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Clio Draft
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Clio Draft (formerly Lawyaw) is a legal document automation solution, offering access to cloud-based fillable court forms, and the ability to turn Microsoft Word documents into fillable templates.
$70
per month per user
Responsive
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Responsive (formerly RFPIO), headquartered in Beaverton, offers their proposal management and automation software, featuring import and export, proposal knowledgebase and answer library, evaluation intake forms, and project management tools (e.g. Gantt chart) associated to proposal tracking.N/A
Pricing
Clio DraftResponsive
Editions & Modules
Cloud-Based Court Forms
$70
per month 1 seat
Intelligent Document Automation
$110
per month 1 seat
PDF Court Form & Document Automation
$150.00
per month 1 seat
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Clio DraftResponsive
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details$30/mo for each additional user. Discounted annual pricing is available.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Clio DraftResponsive
Features
Clio DraftResponsive
Proposal Creation & Organization
Comparison of Proposal Creation & Organization features of Product A and Product B
Clio Draft
-
Ratings
Responsive
7.4
22 Ratings
6% below category average
Proposal branding00 Ratings8.011 Ratings
Proposal templates00 Ratings5.018 Ratings
Proposal content library updates00 Ratings9.022 Ratings
Guided proposal creation00 Ratings8.013 Ratings
Searchable proposal database00 Ratings7.022 Ratings
Proposal Collaboration & Workflow
Comparison of Proposal Collaboration & Workflow features of Product A and Product B
Clio Draft
-
Ratings
Responsive
7.4
22 Ratings
5% below category average
RFP management & response00 Ratings8.022 Ratings
Proposal collaboration & approval00 Ratings8.021 Ratings
User permissions/proposal editing controls00 Ratings9.020 Ratings
Sales proposal workflow00 Ratings6.014 Ratings
Proposal automation user interface00 Ratings6.019 Ratings
Proposal Delivery
Comparison of Proposal Delivery features of Product A and Product B
Clio Draft
-
Ratings
Responsive
8.0
16 Ratings
2% above category average
Proposal distribution00 Ratings8.010 Ratings
Interactive proposals00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
Proposal content tracking00 Ratings8.014 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Clio DraftResponsive
Small Businesses
airSlate WorkFlow
airSlate WorkFlow
Score 9.7 out of 10
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Foxit PDF Editor
Foxit PDF Editor
Score 8.7 out of 10
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Conga Composer
Conga Composer
Score 8.6 out of 10
Conga CPQ
Conga CPQ
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Clio DraftResponsive
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(2 ratings)
9.3
(22 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(17 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.8
(17 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Clio DraftResponsive
Likelihood to Recommend
Clio
Well suited for any law office that uses any court forms. Also, it's great for any law office that needs signatures on any docs. The template features are excellent and a huge plus because any document can become a template in LawYaw. Probably not needed in a law office that only provides consulting or legal advice, but doesn't actually prepare any documents for clients.
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
1. RFPIO is perfect for searching for specific information when you are responding to an RFP. Search engine is powerful. We narrow our search using several customized filters and know we are getting a thorough search. 2. Excel responses work very well in RFPIO. 3. Typical RFPs that are formatted in Word are challenging to run via RFPIO. We struggle with this. 4. We have yet to master the template.
Read full review
Pros
Clio
  • Reduces scrivener's errors.
  • Saves time
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
  • Live collaboration - the ability for multiple experts to simultaneously work on the same RFP.
  • Artificial intelligence - the ability for the product to continually learn what the best answers are and serve them up to our teams.
  • Dynamic branding - the ability for custom brand different templates by vertical, line of business, local branding, etc. with seamless transition.
  • Content review & moderation - the ability for our national content team to bulk review, edit and share content with our teams in a methodical way.
Read full review
Cons
Clio
  • Integrations with case management platforms, such as MyCase
  • Zapier integrations
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
  • Reporting and Analytics is basic, you can purchase advanced analytics though
  • It would have been nice to have a set structure in mind or a example/case study to structure our responses in the most appropriate way, but we are working through that with their stellar support team
  • Really great new features, but expensive
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Clio
No answers on this topic
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
This tool has been fantastic as we have revamped our RFP process. We are much faster and far more efficient.Our win rate is up, but I am not 100% sure this is the cause, but I love to see it. The customer support and training are also fantastic. Thumbs up!
Read full review
Usability
Clio
No answers on this topic
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
Very easy to navigate and use. Very intuitive user interface
Read full review
Support Rating
Clio
No answers on this topic
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
The team at RFPIO is extremely responsive. If I email our account manager or report a bug, I usually hear back within two hours. Additionally, they are quick to make software adjustments based on customer requests and needs. We had a really complicated Excel sheet that their team ended up having to upload for me because of the amount of manual work I was doing. Based on that, they updated the software within two release cycles to make the process more automated, so that future Excel uploads would be more streamlined. I have also had several suggestions implemented rather quickly, and they don't hesitate to reach out for clarification when needed.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Clio
No answers on this topic
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
We were able to complete an RFP during our free trial. We were already leaning toward RFPIO but that pushed us over the edge.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Clio
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
I was not involved in the process of selecting RFP360 for our firm, so I am largely unfamiliar with competitors. I am, however, quite pleased with RFP360 as a user, and am confident that my colleagues who were responsible for making the decision were thorough and discerning.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Clio
  • It has been a huge time saver for everyone at our firm.
  • It's so easy to use that our staff actually enjoys using it.
  • Our ROI is almost incalculable because of all the features for the price.
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
  • I don't have access to the actual ROI data, but we would continue to invest in RFPIO as a company only if it were providing us with the results to win RFPs.
  • RFPIO makes the task of filling out RFP responses much faster for me.
  • RFPIO helps our team be able to divide out RFP chores easily, because we know we all have access to the same high-quality source for information.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Clio Draft Screenshots

Screenshot of Document Automation | Template SetsScreenshot of Document Automation | Document ReviewScreenshot of Court Forms | PopulatedScreenshot of Court Forms | Client Info

Responsive Screenshots

Screenshot of a view of the platformScreenshot of an AI generated responseScreenshot of some of the available customer resourcesScreenshot of some of the available integrationsScreenshot of a promotional flyerScreenshot of an example of the AI augmented content management feature