Codacy vs. Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP)
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Codacy | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request reporting back the impact of every commit or pull request, issues concerning code style, best practices, security, and many others. It monitors changes in code coverage, code duplication and code complexity. Saving developers time in code reviews thus efficiently tackling technical debt. JavaScript, Java, Ruby, Scala, PHP, Python, CoffeeScript and CSS are currently supported. Codacy is static analysis… | $0 |
Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) helps organizations efficiently detect, mitigate and respond to known and unknown advanced threats that target people and VIPs through email. TAP provides unparalleled effectiveness in stopping targeted attacks that use polymorphic malware, weaponized documents and credential-stealing phishing techniques to obtain sensitive information. TAP seamlessly integrates with the Proofpoint secure email gateway (Proofpoint Email Protection) to deliver best… | N/A |
| Codacy | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Codacy | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 5 Answers | 88% Would buy again 7 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 5 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 5 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 8 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 83% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 5 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 6 Answers | |
| Codacy | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Beyond Compare Score9.3 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Beyond Compare Score9.3 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | Beyond Compare Score9.3 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Codacy | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.2 | 9.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 5.3 |
| Usability | - | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | 9.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 9.9 |
| Codacy | Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Codacy Screenshots |









