TrustRadius

CodeScene vs. Atlassian Crucible (discontinued)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CodeScene
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
CodeScene is able to consider the temporal dimension and evolution of the whole system. This makes it possible for CodeScene to prioritize technical debt and code quality issues based on how the organization actually works with the code.
$20
per month in Euros
Atlassian Crucible (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Atlasssian Crucible is a peer review tool for finding bugs and defects in version control tools Subversion, Git, Mercurial, CVS, and Perforce. In 2025, Atlassian discontinued new sales of Crucible. The product is being sunsetted.N/A
Pricing
CodeSceneAtlassian Crucible (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
Standard
$20
per month in Euros
Pro
$30
per month in Euros
Enterprise
custom pricing
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CodeSceneAtlassian Crucible (discontinued)
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CodeSceneAtlassian Crucible (discontinued)
Considered Both Products
CodeScene

No answer on this topic

Atlassian Crucible (discontinued)
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Atlassian Crucible (discontinued)
Not exactly an apples to apples comparison. Back when we were using SVN, Crucible was the go-to solution for code review. As we started moving to use Git and using pull requests (via Bitbucket), code review is now performed by using pull requests exclusively.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Atlassian Crucible (discontinued)
Crucible has a better look and feel for developers because it is web compatible and works well with IE or Chrome.
Being that it is a web browser friendly, using Crucible is seamless and user-friendly.
Github is an external tool on a different environment that requires more …
Craig Solinski | TrustRadius Reviewer
Craig Solinski
Systems Administrator/Programmer
Chose Atlassian Crucible (discontinued)
Crucible was first on the market and the price is inexpensive. Crucible integrates with Jira Software and Atlassian Fisheye, providing the ability to track defects efficiently. Sonarqube compares code to 'best standards' but not 'internal standards' and does not integrate to …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Atlassian Crucible (discontinued)
I think Crucible isn't quite as clean as Stash/Bitbucket, but it does some things better, like seeing individual commits easier. I also like how stash groups all comments on the overview of the Pull Request.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Atlassian Crucible (discontinued)
Gitlab and Github are very comparable to Crucible, and would probably be my first choice if those were the tools used for versioning as they are directly linked to git. Crucible was chosen by a current client and I had no choice in its selection. I would probably have chosen …
Best Alternatives
CodeSceneAtlassian Crucible (discontinued)
Small Businesses
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.2 out of 10
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.6 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.4 out of 10
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CodeSceneAtlassian Crucible (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.6
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CodeSceneAtlassian Crucible (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
Depends on the version control and devops process your development teams adopt. Git (via Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab, etc...) has become the new industry norm, and using pull requests can often provide the same code review features Crucible is used for. However, if you require code review beyond change/diff based (i.e. via pull request), then Crucible allows you to review code with more granular control, such as on per file basis.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Easily add comments, identify defects, gather peer input.
  • 24/7 input from peers eases developer schedules and location independence.
  • Email notifications filtered by group or individuals provide control of who gets notifications, and who can submit comments.
Craig Solinski | TrustRadius Reviewer
Craig Solinski
Systems Administrator/Programmer
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • It can sometimes be a bit slow to load. A server reboot for us tends to solve that issue. I'm not sure if it is a server issue, or maybe Crucible may have some caching issues.
  • I wish that you could easily stop the review creation process, rather than abandoning it.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Good support overall being an Atlassian product, with options including free/paid official support and community provided help.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Gitlab and GitHub are very comparable to Crucible, and would probably be my first choice if those were the tools used for versioning as they are directly linked to git. Crucible was chosen by a current client and I had no choice in its selection. I would probably have chosen GitHub if given a say.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • I am not involved in the acquisition of Crucible so I cannot comment on the financial investment but I believe it is a necessary tool to have in any software shop, small or big.
  • As a developer, having Crucible as the code review process is a great asset and will save time and reduce risks which I believe is a positive return of investment.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots

CodeScene Screenshots

Screenshot of CodeScene