CodeSignal vs. HackerEarth Assessments

I think code signal is one of the best platforms for organizations to better test the resource for their coding skills. Its way of conducting the test saves engineering time, reduces the risks that hiring companies have in technical interviews, and provides a cheating-free environment. The platform can be improved to make the new learners practice well on the platform and get used to it.

Incentivized

Here are some scenarios based on my experience where HackerEarth Assessments is well suited,

1. Straightforward tool and the learning curve is not at all steep so getting new employees onboarded on the tool is smooth.
2. Job Description related questionnaire library is conducive for quickly setting up
3. The coding platform is really good, it gives solid ide and amazing debugging abilities for the people being assessed
4. Their support of different types of assessments be it programs or MCQs is really flawless and quite impressive.

Basically I didn't find any such situations where it didn't perform according to what it is intended to. One thing I would just point out that their pricing strategy could be improved, like it is on the higher side for small scale companies

Incentivized

• The test cases are quite well-written, and the grade we earn as a result of them is very fair. Users can use a unit testing tool to perform their own unit testing, allowing them to double-check their code before submitting it.
• Intensive technical interview preparation
• The online evaluation option is an excellent approach to assess candidates.
• Simple UI for Simple Operations

Incentivized

• we can design assessment tests using almost all programming languages.
• We can create customized test cases for a given assessment test.
• It is very economical to our organization.

Incentivized

• The platform should provide candidates with detailed feedback, allowing them to identify areas for improvement if necessary.
• Furthermore, despite the fact that the assessment is complete, the platform prioritizes speed. In order to finish the assignment on time, people may be forced to forgo quality or desired output.
• They should improve the question selection procedure, as some of the questions are too long to finish in the allocated time.

Incentivized

• Code editor should be more responsive for auto suggestions.
• Practice environment should be located in such a way that it should be found easily.
• A transparent and publicly available pricing.

I give it this rating because it is very easy to use. Not only that it is proctored and trusted. Moreover, the candidates find it easy to use given that it is a single test. This means that we get much more applications than using other platforms. This helps us to hire better faster and easier with codesignal.

Incentivized

It's very straightfoward to use and simple. For our use case in coding interviews, we generate a link, give it to the candidate and we never got any complaints or questions asked, they were able to follow our scenarios perfectly.

Incentivized

Yes, the staff has been very quick

Incentivized

Yes, pages load quickly, reports comes in a reasonable time frame, only when CodeSIgnal integrates, it provide small glitches.

Incentivized

I am not sure whether or not they have replaced but surely emerged as a big competitor. Their support system should be good knowing that they are in completion with the best hackerrank. I feel they could do a much better job but I have not used their support much

Incentivized

It has clear details for every staff to understand the basic, and staffs can communicate efficiently to provide strong backgrounds. Also, the manager who provided this training has collaborated well with the Codesignal staff so that everyone could learn more about CodeSignal and look at it from different users' perspectives. So the training was really helpful

Incentivized

There were some issues with the compiler

Incentivized

It just works

Incentivized

Codesignal provides features like screen recording and monitors candidates while they take the assessments, thereby reducing the possibility of cheating during the assessment, which is a known problem with other providers like HackerRank. Codesignal also provides predictive coding scores, which helps to better assess the capabilities of the candidates.

Incentivized

Compared to HackerRank, HackerEarth Assessments offers a similar coding assessment platform with a focus on tailored challenges for technical hiring. While both platforms assess coding skills, HackerEarth Assessments excels in remote evaluation and diversity outreach. There wasn't the much of a difference, but the UI of HackerEarth was nicer and we got a better price.

Incentivized

It works on multiple departments.

Incentivized

• It has been advantageous in terms of saving time for our interviewees due to its simpler approach.
• My coding abilities have greatly improved and continue to aid me in the interviews process.
• The User Interface has caused me to spend more time on this application and has prompted me to discover new and more productive development techniques.

Incentivized

• Helps in understanding the coding skills of a candidate before an interview
• We don't have to explicitly set up a filtering round for the candidates
• Extremely User friendly

Incentivized