CodeStream vs. PTC Windchill RV&S

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CodeStream
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
The vendor states CodeStream helps development teams resolve issues faster, and improve code quality by streamlining code reviews inside an IDE. CodeStream enables asynchronous communication among developers on a team, anywhere. Review changes in the context of the full source tree, using preferred keybindings and environments. Use a simple shortcut to highlight code and CodeStream will automatically assign a reviewer based on context and history. Comment and code review threads are…
$10
Per Seat / Per Month
PTC Windchill RV&S
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
PTC Windchill RV&S (formerly Integrity Lifecycle Manager of the Integrity suite) is an MBSE (model-based systems engineering) suite. The former Integrity suite contains an Asset Library which supports systems-of-systems approach to design (i.e. linking models into higher-level models that subsume them), a Process Director which is designed to articulate, manage and improve the design process, and a Modeler for visualizing and controlling the product design process. The Integrity suite is…N/A
Pricing
CodeStreamPTC Windchill RV&S
Editions & Modules
Basic
$10.00
Per Seat / Per Month
Enterprise
$49.00
Per Seat / Per Month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CodeStreamPTC Windchill RV&S
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsEnterprise tier includes admin console with advanced usage analytics, realtime merge conflict detection, API access, Single sign-on (SSO), premium support and success services
More Pricing Information
Best Alternatives
CodeStreamPTC Windchill RV&S
Small Businesses
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.1 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.1 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce Helix Core
Perforce Helix Core
Score 7.4 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CodeStreamPTC Windchill RV&S
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(3 ratings)
9.0
(16 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(10 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.8
(4 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
CodeStreamPTC Windchill RV&S
Likelihood to Recommend
CodeStream
CodeStream is well suited for all developments where two or more people are developing something and I feel there's rarely any project which is been developed and maintained by a single developer. So in short codestream is suitable for almost every development team: - More than one person is developing the code. - People need to get frequent reviews for efficient development. - Best suitable for the teams where new people are there very often. - Collaborations are part of every day to day activities. - Without raising PR and branch management reviews are been incorporated.
Read full review
PTC
PTC Integrity is an excellent source code management and version control tool, and I would suggest anyone to use it for that purpose. We can even define our workflows using individual forms for implementing Change Management, Defect Management and Access management requests. If properly used, this tool is great for managing our code for very long periods, considering my 4-5 years of usage. Though the UI could be better, and integration with some application servers could be better implemented, this tool is a good tool.
Read full review
Pros
CodeStream
  • Integration
  • Easy to use.
  • Easy to maintain.
Read full review
PTC
  • Helps to advance carefully through complicated and delicate process hives.
  • Improve thereby our time-to-market knowledge transfers along our portfolio.
  • Enhances the performances of single step in processes as well as the processes.
  • Allows for unprecedented overview in broads and in depths.
Read full review
Cons
CodeStream
  • UI and navigation between services
  • Only support YAML method
  • Manual setting of triggers in the pipeline
Read full review
PTC
  • It can be overwhelming with the number of tabs, functions and ways to achieve the same result. The average user may struggle with learning the tool.
  • The text editing in Integrity is weak and does not provide many options. Because of this, many user decide to use MS word instead, to document requirements.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
CodeStream
No answers on this topic
PTC
I do not make decisions on what tool my company uses. I am just the user of the tool and such decisions are not handled by me. If I were to make such decisions, I would definitely renew MKS, considering the amount of data we have stored in MKS and the current number of users who are familiar with the system
Read full review
Usability
CodeStream
No answers on this topic
PTC
PTC Integrity comparatively could be considered a nice Source code management, Version controlling tool and could be compared with tools like StarTeam. If the integration to move/migrate code could be integrated into this tool, it would become an extremely powerful tool.
Read full review
Support Rating
CodeStream
No answers on this topic
PTC
PTC Integrity administration can be somewhat daunting. They have been able to help with every question that I have submitted. Their support website is very easy to understand and submit questions and their phone support is wonderful
Read full review
Implementation Rating
CodeStream
No answers on this topic
PTC
I wasn't involved in implementation.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
CodeStream
When compared to Bitbucket, CodeStream is a luck lustre. Even though the overall features are more with CodeStream like customisation of API and more control of triggers across the designed pipeline, Bitbucket and Visual Studio score better in terms of faster implementation and dedicated and proven support system . Apart from that CodeStream fairs better than AWS CodePipeline in overall features
Read full review
PTC
I think the reason that PTC Integrity was initially chosen is that it was the best product available in the mix at the time. This coupled with the PTC deal on multiple products was a no brainer based on the size and scope of potential users.
Read full review
Return on Investment
CodeStream
  • Productivity of the team increased.
  • Lowered the chances of mistakes at the time of review.
  • No corners left un-observed.
  • The development cycle becomes more interactive and hence team enjoys the peer discussions and review process.
  • A lot of time is been saved, no need of conventional time taking reviews procedures.
Read full review
PTC
  • MKS Integrity has proved to be particularly useful in the software development process by increasing employee effieciency
  • MKS integrity has also made software development a very efficient process and makes feature releases and bug fixing a lot easier
  • In addition to the above, our organization has been able to support manufacturing easily by reverting to a previous software version in case of an emergency.
  • It has also led to faster time to market for new products.
Read full review
ScreenShots

CodeStream Screenshots

Screenshot of Code DiscussionScreenshot of Slack IntegrationScreenshot of Code Review