SDWAN|Link vs. Screenful

It’s great tool to manage our network environment and the additional features allow us to troubleshoot better than the old days. Templates is great allowing us to push updates within a few clicks

Screenful works really well when integrated with Jira and GitHub, both of which do not have the robust data visualisation capability. In contrast, we tried using it for Monday.com but did not see much added value there

Incentivized

• Burndown charts.
• Milestone completion.
• Team task allocation and man hours spent.

Incentivized

• I feel there is room for improvement when it comes to supporting guides, knowledge centers.
• Also, customer support options might a good resource to have.
• I have always liked tools that show what similar teams are doing to use the tool. Like a case study. I did not find that here.

Incentivized

The SDWAN|Link performs well in path selection, traffic steering and consistent application experience

I selected screenful because it was easier to use and more cost-effective. Asana seems like a better fit in terms of design and appeal but eventually, after I did a trial of both platforms, I found Screenful to be a better fit for our needs. I also did a trial of Agency analytics but did not like it.

Incentivized

• In terms of ROI and value there has been a positive impact for sure.
• In terms of product updates and new integrations, I feel there is room for improvement.
• It gets the basic features and APIs right which I love.

Incentivized