CompAnalyst vs. Pave

I highly recommend considering CompAnalyst if you're looking to take your compensation function to the next level. If you're looking to create a "one stop shop" for your compensation needs, then this is the software for you. You can easily manage job descriptions and survey data, and you can empower your HR teams to find information in the tool by giving them access to specific areas of the site. The system can be configured to fit the needs of your organization

Incentivized

Pave seems to work really well in the technology/software industry. Not sure about others, but seems limited, depending on what roles/jobs you are looking at. Data can be pretty limited, especially when you get more granular and look at levels versus prefixes (junior, senior, etc.). Highly recommended as one of at least a few data sources for compensation, depending on industry

Incentivized

• It allows us to benchmark our internal comp structure and design effective comp ranges.
• CompAnalyst allows us to benchmark our internal compensation with others in our industry.
• Allows us to market our comp ranges within a region, or across the US.
• Most of our job titles can be found within CompAnalyst.

Incentivized

• Easy to use
• Free version (if you sync your HR system) still valuable
• Company-sourced versus employee
• Well defined levels and scope for roles
• Always adding more countries and data

Incentivized

• the user interface is not very intuitive, takes some time to get used to
• do not like the default to national rates unless you check it off

Incentivized

• Need more data, especially for more niche roles
• Need more roles represented
• Need more industries covered

Incentivized

It could be a little more user friendly but once you get used to it it is fine. I love having a tool at my disposal that is current and accurate. I also like the fact that it keeps adding jobs and creates an broad database across multiple industries and even within industries to compare "apples to apples"

Incentivized

Our Professional Services Consultant and Customer Success Manager are always available to answer our questions. If I have a compensation-related question, they will find the answer for us. They take our product feedback seriously, and the team has implemented a few of our requested features in the system. Their Vice President of Product Management is always open to receiving feedback, and CompAnalyst is always reaching out to customers to demo and test new product offerings.

Incentivized

CompAnalyst gives me bang for my buck. It can get data other surveys may miss. It is easy to use and understand.

Incentivized

We have used or currently still use the others I listed. Others not found in TrustRadius include Ravio, Salary.com, and Figures.hr.

It is best practice in HR to use more than one source for compensation data and aggregate them together, which is what I do with Pave alongside other systems. I do consider Pave to be a better option compared to others, but I think the more compensation data you can get your hands on, the better.

Incentivized

• Allowed us to put together global grades
• Helps us quickly update ranges during merit
• makes sure we have the latest data for jobs

Incentivized

• Reduced time to find reliable compensation data
• Improved accuracy versus using other sources that are more crowdsourced
• More informed decisions around compensation and how we decide on what base salaries to offer

Incentivized