Cone Proposal-to-Payment vs. Responsive
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cone Proposal-to-Payment | N/A | N/A | Cone Proposal-to-Payment is a platform that simplifies the process of selling and collecting money. For professional services and startups, it is used in proposal management. With its unified workflow, Cone automates proposals, e-Sign, invoicing, and payment collections. It allows users to create interactive web proposals and receive e-signatures. The platform generates invoices for signed proposals. It takes care of the Account Receivables process with automation, integrating with accounting… | $0 |
Responsive | Score8.9 out of 10 | N/A | Responsive (formerly RFPIO), headquartered in Beaverton, offers their proposal management and automation software, featuring import and export, proposal knowledgebase and answer library, evaluation intake forms, and project management tools (e.g. Gantt chart) associated to proposal tracking. | N/A |
| Cone Proposal-to-Payment | Responsive | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Cone Proposal-to-Payment | Responsive | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 34 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 24 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 34 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 25 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 95% Implementation went as expected 21 Answers | |
| Cone Proposal-to-Payment | Responsive | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Qwilr Score8 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Cone Proposal-to-Payment | Responsive | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 9.3 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.5 |
| Usability | - | 10.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 9.8 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 10.0 |
| Cone Proposal-to-Payment | Responsive | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots | Cone Proposal-to-Payment Screenshots | Responsive Screenshots |
















