ConfigCat vs. OpenText Application Quality Management
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ConfigCat | Score8.9 out of 10 | N/A | ConfigCat allows the user to launch new features and change software configuration without (re)deploying code. ConfigCat SDKs enable easy integration with any web, mobile or backend applications. The ConfigCat website enables non-developers too to switch ON/OFF application features or change software configuration. This way the user can decouple feature launches and configuration from code deployment. | $0 per month |
OpenText Application Quality Management | Score4 out of 10 | N/A | Replacing the former AccuRev, OpenText™ Application Quality Management is a solution to govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes, offering a single pane of glass for software quality management. | N/A |
| ConfigCat | OpenText Application Quality Management | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Fair pricing policy: All features available in all plans, even in Free. Simple and predictable prices. No hidden fees. We don't charge for team size. We don't charge for MAUs (monthly active users). Our plans only differ in limitations. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| ConfigCat | OpenText Application Quality Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 16 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 15 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 16 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 15 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 15 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| ConfigCat | OpenText Application Quality Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | Polarion ALM Score10 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | No answers on this topic | PTC Windchill RV&S Score2 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management Score5 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| ConfigCat | OpenText Application Quality Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.7 | 1.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.1 | 6.1 |
| Usability | 8.7 | - |
| Availability | - | 7.0 |
| Support Rating | 9.1 | - |
| ConfigCat | OpenText Application Quality Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
|
|
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | ConfigCat Screenshots |







