Constructor.io Search vs. Elastic Enterprise Search

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Constructor.io Search
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Constructor Search promises to improve conversions and revenue from onsite and in-app search, using search science and artificial intelligence, Constructor's cloud-based search-as-a-service solution uses natural language processing, machine learning-enhanced results ranking, collaborative personalization, and merchant controls to power enterprise-grade onsite and in-app search. Whether search results are optimized for relevance, revenue, conversions, conversations — or all of the…N/A
Elastic Enterprise Search
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Elastic Enterprise Search Swiftype is a platform with modules for Site Search, App Search and Workplace Search, that boasts powering search for thousands of enterprises and websites. The services were developed by Swiftype and acquired by Elastic in late 2017. Powered by Elasticsearch, the vendor states Elastic Enterprise Search is fast, with proven, optimized relevance models designed for real-life, natural search.
$79
per month
Pricing
Constructor.io SearchElastic Enterprise Search
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Standard
$79
per month
Pro
$199
per month
Premium
Custom
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Constructor.io SearchElastic Enterprise Search
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Constructor.io SearchElastic Enterprise Search
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Constructor.io SearchElastic Enterprise Search
Small Businesses
Kameleoon
Kameleoon
Score 9.5 out of 10
Algolia
Algolia
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 9.1 out of 10
Guru
Guru
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 9.1 out of 10
Guru
Guru
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Constructor.io SearchElastic Enterprise Search
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
8.1
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Constructor.io SearchElastic Enterprise Search
Likelihood to Recommend
Constructor.io Corporation
Constructor.io Search takes all of the guesswork out of maintaining a search engine. As merchandisers or product teams, we have educated guesses at how search relevance should work but the customer is always king. We can't always predict the ways in which consumers will search or what their intent is. That's why the behavioral-driven approach that Constructor.io employs works so well. It means that merchandisers can focus on their sales and promotional responsibilities, instead of wasting time and bandwidth on base-level relevance questions.
Read full review
Elastic
Swiftype is excellent for e-commerce companies and especially the financial services sector where speed plays a major role in executing transactions. It is also very dynamic and customizable. It is very useful for electronics/travel reservations on e-commerce sites also. The only place it is inappropriate is when it comes to indexing a website in which case Google is slightly better, as I mentioned before. There is nothing much to complain about here in regards to the breadth of applications and analytics it offers.
Read full review
Pros
Constructor.io Corporation
  • Optimizes for business KPIs, not string matches, so merchandisers can focus on strategy instead of maintaining a dictionary.
  • Gives merchandisers control to curate the right customer experience per their expert understanding.
  • Customer/technical support during and after implementation.
Read full review
Elastic
  • It's very easy to implement. The documentation is great and you can be up and running very quickly.
  • It's easy to configure. The web-based user interface makes it super simple to configure (i.e. customize search rankings, edit synonyms, etc.).
  • Their support is very friendly and helpful. Whenever I had a question or couldn't figure something old, they were quick to help me out.
Read full review
Cons
Constructor.io Corporation
  • Visibility of the personalization algorithm.
  • Exposing detailed analytics within the customer-facing dashboard.
  • "Top searches" available via API.
Read full review
Elastic
  • Swiftype does not have indexes ready to go. When you add a new website to the search set, it takes some time to index the website. This is something that is different from what Google does. Google in this particular aspect does a relatively better job.
  • Swiftype is very expensive, this makes it difficult for smaller companies to afford.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Constructor.io Corporation
No answers on this topic
Elastic
Google Search Appliance is no longer supported. Apache Solr is a popular, free open source solution, but it lacks a web crawler and is more difficult to configure and maintain.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Constructor.io Corporation
No answers on this topic
Elastic
  • It has a positive impact as it helps traders and other users to seamlessly use applications.
  • It has a positive ROI and we would know the results in time to come.
Read full review
ScreenShots