Contentful is a cloud based CMS solution that provides the ability to manage content across multiple platforms.The editing interface allows for managing content interactively and provides developers the ability to deliver the content with the programming language and template framework of their choice.
$0
OpenText Web CMS
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenText
Web CMS (TeamSite) accelerates and simplifies the end-to-end digital content and campaign
lifecycle, from content creation and rich media management to omnichannel
publication, optimization, automation, commerce, and community. According to the vendor, with
TeamSite, users can:
Capture diverse digital
audiences with amazing brand experiences – Give customers and prospects consistent, high-quality brand
experiences across devices and channels, and foster closer…
N/A
Pricing
Contentful
OpenText Web CMS
Editions & Modules
Lite
$300
per month
Community
Free
Enterprise
Custom
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Contentful
OpenText Web CMS
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Contentful
OpenText Web CMS
Features
Contentful
OpenText Web CMS
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Contentful
8.5
10 Ratings
3% above category average
OpenText Web CMS
8.6
7 Ratings
5% above category average
Role-based user permissions
8.510 Ratings
8.67 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Contentful
9.5
12 Ratings
21% above category average
OpenText Web CMS
7.9
7 Ratings
2% above category average
API
9.311 Ratings
8.76 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language
9.79 Ratings
7.26 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Contentful
7.8
13 Ratings
0% above category average
OpenText Web CMS
8.0
7 Ratings
3% above category average
WYSIWYG editor
7.34 Ratings
7.87 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness
9.58 Ratings
7.76 Ratings
Admin section
9.311 Ratings
8.17 Ratings
Page templates
7.64 Ratings
7.46 Ratings
Library of website themes
7.52 Ratings
8.36 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design
4.57 Ratings
8.37 Ratings
Publishing workflow
9.312 Ratings
8.17 Ratings
Form generator
7.01 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
It's a great all rounder for content projects. It's easy in the basics and powerful in the complex, data heavy scenarios. Extending the platform is straightforward and the SDK gives you everything you need. If you have many many varying content types , it gets expensive and perhaps not the best choice .
OpenText TeamSite is well-suited to large, enterprise-wide implementations where customization, content governance, and dynamic content distribution is needed or prioritized. It is probably not ideal for smaller sites with simple architecture and few resources to manage custom implementation.
Contentful uses "references" to allow you to build very modular content. If I have a "slider" content type, I can create a "slide" content type which references a "button" content type, and so forth. This works well, but I occasionally wish there was a better solution for one-off content, like a settings page. Currently, this is done for creating an entire content type called "settings" with a single entry. Not a big deal, but not ideal, either.
There are a few quirks with GatsbyJS integration, etc, but these issues are being fixed and improved upon very quickly.
A minor gripe, but Contentful does not have a way to organize fields within an entry. Entries with many fields are somewhat tiresome to scroll through.
It is a very easy to use and configure application. I find that it is on the user to manage the content after the models have been created, yet I still do not encounter issues finding or creating new components for our site. It is easy to set up and easy to navigate.
Overall, it's a solid package with the potential to offer much functionality with appropriate resources applied. There are a few issues with the authoring interface that OpenText should address before its a top shelf authoring experience.
Our technical resources engage with OpenText TeamSite so I don't have direct experience. However, critical issues that we need help with seem to get the attention they deserve without issue. However, training and user resources for business owner roles are a bit lacking and some annoying issues with the authoring interface should be addressed sooner.
Easy to use and much more organized as a single platform versus multi. The layout is clean and easy to read and we don’t have to worry about certain users safe guarding data or content then losing it when they leave the company. It’s a one stop shop for imagery
It offers more content editing features at a relatively low cost thus overall deployment is lower in cost. It has great customer support who are always there to support and answer to our needs thus making the process of deployment seamless at every stage and offering training for working with their product.
Contentful has saved us valuable development time that was previously spent doing deploys for minor content updates.
Contentful has helped us maintain consistent documentation, reducing time needed to review for consistency.
Can't say we've really experienced any negative ROI impacts from using Contentful, but we've run into some limitations in adding too many content models and the next pricing tier is substantially more expensive.
We integrated with google analytics, now we have the proper comprehension of our audience data reception and behaviors - we've greatly improved on personalized marketing.
Quick publication of content across the main digital channels.
We run our digital campaigns swiftly.
We've maintained our brand consistency for three years.