Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform vs. Qwilr
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform | Score6 out of 10 | N/A | The Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform, including technology from the former Determine Selectica CPQ solution acquired by Corcentric in April 2019, is designed to provide a customizable CPQ solution to cover an enterprise's need to offer many possible permutations of combinations of product and service in a streamlined fashion. | N/A |
Qwilr | Score8.1 out of 10 | N/A | Qwilr is designed to change the way a business creates and shares documents on the web. This solution allows businesses to turn traditional documents into powerful and interactive webpages that look great on any device. The vendor says this in turn offers businesses access to analytics and other helpful tools when sharing quotes, proposals and presentations with clients. | $39 per month |
| Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform | Qwilr | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Qwilr is a freemium product. Users upgrade to the Business or Enterprise plans for access to premium features, like advanced analytics, security and branding controls, get sales material accepted, e-signed and collect payments via Stripe. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform | Qwilr | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 86% Would buy again 6 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 7 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 6 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 6 Answers | |
| Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform | Qwilr | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposal Creation & Organization |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Proposal Collaboration & Workflow |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Proposal Delivery |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform | Qwilr | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | Proposify Score7.9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Precoro Score9.5 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | GEP Quantum Intelligence Score9.1 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform | Qwilr | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 5.0 | 8.4 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 5.0 | 9.1 |
| Usability | - | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 9.4 |
| Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform | Qwilr | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
|
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Qwilr Screenshots |








