Couchbase Capella vs. Neo4j

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Couchbase Capella
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
The Couchbase Capella product is a fully managed DBaaS automating setup and ongoing operations.
$0.32
per hour per node
Neo4j
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Neo4j is an open source embeddable graph database developed by Neo Technologies based in San Mateo, California with an office in Sweden.
$65
per month
Pricing
Couchbase CapellaNeo4j
Editions & Modules
Basic
$0.32
per hour per node
Developer Pro
$0.40
per hour per node
Enterprise
$0.65
per hour per node
Aura Professional
$65
per month
Community Edition
Free
Enterprise Edition
Contact Sales
Aura Free
Free
Aura Enterprise
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Couchbase CapellaNeo4j
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Couchbase CapellaNeo4j
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
Couchbase CapellaNeo4j
Small Businesses
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.2 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.2 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.2 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Couchbase CapellaNeo4j
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
2.2
(9 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Couchbase CapellaNeo4j
Likelihood to Recommend
Couchbase
Couchbase is a great NoSQL database and most businesses will benefit from this software. For those launching and developing applications, Couchbase is a solution. In addition, those businesses that requires a NoSQL data base will as well benefit. In a nutshell, Couchbase has something for every business depending on the version you choose.
Read full review
Neo Technologies
Neo4J is great for creating network graphs or illustrating how things are related. It is also good for finding individuals or things that have greater influence than others in a system. It is not appropriate if you have standard data sets that can be analyzed using conventional methods or visualized using Tableau, for example.
Read full review
Pros
Couchbase
  • Query searching
  • Can integrate multiple data sources
  • High performance database
  • Disaster recovery
  • Scalable
  • Very secure
Read full review
Neo Technologies
  • Mature Query language, I found Cypher QL to be mature in handling all sorts of problems we throw at it. Its expressive enough to be intuitive while providing rich features for various scenarios.
  • Native support for REST API, that makes interacting with Neo4J intuitive and easy.
  • Support for Procedures in Java, procedures are custom code that could be added to the Neo4J to write custom querying of data. The best part about the procedures is it could be invoked using the REST API. This allows us to overcome any shortcomings from their Cypher query language.
  • Nice UI and interface for executing the Query and visualizing the response.
  • UI access controlled by User credentials allows for neat access controls.
  • Awesome free community edition for small-scale projects.
Read full review
Cons
Couchbase
  • Query processing is slow
Read full review
Neo Technologies
  • One of the hardest challenges that Neo4j had to solve was the horizontal scaling problem. I am not updated on recent developments, but at the time of my use, I couldn't find a viable solution.
  • Neo4j does not play with other open source APIs like Blueprint. You have to use the native Neo4j API.
  • There wasn't a visual tool to see your data. Of course, third party tools are always available, but I would have loved something which came with the Neo4j bundle. I love that Docker comes bundled with Kitematic, so it's not wrong to hope that Neo4j could also ship with some default visualization software.
Read full review
Usability
Couchbase
No answers on this topic
Neo Technologies
[Based on] Query Language, Performance on small and large data sets, integration and deployment, analysis, API support, Interactive UI.
Read full review
Performance
Couchbase
Couchbase handles multiple data sources efficiently and is also good at handling high data volumes. It is scalable as well which is a plus
Read full review
Neo Technologies
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Couchbase
Couchbase offers more flexibility, it is more secure and most importantly, it is scalable and therefore affordable.
Read full review
Neo Technologies
Neo4j is a graph store and has different use cases compared to another NoSQL Document store like MongoDB. MongoDB is a bad choice when joins are common as existing operators for joining two documents (similar to tables in a relational store) as Mongo 3.5 use SQL like join algorithms which are expensive. MongoDB is a great choice when distributed schemaless rich document structures are important requirements. Cross document transaction support is not native to MongoDB yet, whereas Neo4J is ACID complaint with all its operations.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Couchbase
  • This is a NoSQL Database
  • Couchbase is very secure
  • Couchbase is very fast when processing queries
Read full review
Neo Technologies
  • Positive: Less complex queries on graph structures, than in relational databases.
  • Negative: maintenance is a huge deal, things doesn't work and break, requiring lengthy restore operations.
Read full review
ScreenShots