Criteria vs. DIBELS Next

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Criteria
Score 9.7 out of 10
N/A
Criteria is an assessment company dedicated to helping organizations make better talent decisions using objective, multidimensional data. By combining data science with validation backed by I/O psychologists, they aim to provide precise assessments. Their assessments cover aptitude, personality, emotional intelligence, and skills to provide the most robust picture of talent. Since launching in 2006, the vendor states their assessments have been administered more than 25 million times through our…N/A
DIBELS Next
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
DIBELS Next are short (one minute) fluency measures that can be used for universal screening, benchmark assessment, and progress monitoring in Kindergarten - 6th grade, and are developed and maintained by the University of Oregon's Center on Teaching & Learning.N/A
Pricing
CriteriaDIBELS Next
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CriteriaDIBELS Next
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CriteriaDIBELS Next
Best Alternatives
CriteriaDIBELS Next
Small Businesses
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Score 9.9 out of 10
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Score 9.9 out of 10
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Score 9.9 out of 10
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Renaissance Accelerated Reader
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CriteriaDIBELS Next
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
CriteriaDIBELS Next
Likelihood to Recommend
Criteria Corp.
Best for small to mid-sized companies where you do not have a robust applicant tracking system. It served a dual purpose for my company and made my job easier. If you are large, the applicant tracking system is not beneficial to you while the assessments might be. If it can integrate directly with your system, use it!
Read full review
University of Oregon
More intense face-to-face training would be beneficial. The students can utilize their accounts easily. I like the assessment three times per year & my access to see if a student has gained, and if not, then reasoning is given. Some of the reports are hard for families to follow and understand. Honestly, I preferred the computer interface from the past years as opposed to the current system.
Read full review
Pros
Criteria Corp.
  • Customer Support
  • Training
  • Easy to use interface
  • Ability to customize
Read full review
University of Oregon
  • On-going Reading/Phonics/Dyslexia Screening
  • Monthly Progress Monitoring
  • Easy for the students to use on their end
Read full review
Cons
Criteria Corp.
  • Integration with more HRIS platforms
  • More job descriptions for professional roles
  • Computer based testing that is more specialized
Read full review
University of Oregon
  • Presentation of the “how to”- I miss the older days of meeting for a week and learning the product inside & out.
  • More user-friendly format for those giving assessments-difficult to use the home page & areas within.
  • Parents/guardians have a difficult time with some of the written items, their lack of understanding.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Criteria Corp.
No answers on this topic
University of Oregon
Both provide BOY, MOY, & EOY Assessments. We Progress Monitor with both, but Renaissance is much easier for the students to use themselves. My students never complain about DIBELS Next testing (they like to see if they “move up.”) However, Renaissance is a product I have used successfully for many more years, and the ease of use is ideal when in a busy classroom.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Criteria Corp.
  • Efficiency for a one person HR team
  • Better recruiting practices
  • Higher retention
Read full review
University of Oregon
  • I’m not with the monetary element, but I would think our school has benefitted from this investment.
Read full review
ScreenShots