What users are saying about
8 Ratings
34 Ratings
8 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener noreferrer'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 7.5 out of 100
34 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener noreferrer'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.6 out of 100

Likelihood to Recommend

Crucible

Crucible is well suited for situations where development teams follow a branch-based merge process, where new features or automation stories are introduced. It allows more seasoned team members to check newer team members' code to ensure standards are followed. It is probably less appropriate for smaller development teams or smaller projects, where code reviews can be less formal.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

SonarQube

We have a headache every time when making a new commit+push, because:
  • Check rules could be tight and motivate developers to change the source code.
  • Sonar rules insist on their own rules and no way for trade.
  • Sometimes we missed that some piece of code does not cover by the test, so we need to return to the task again
  • SonarCube + SonarLint helps us to achieve the best quality source code but takes so much time for it.
Aleksei Jegorov | TrustRadius Reviewer

Pros

Crucible

  • Supports all major source control systems such as SVN and Git.
  • Integration with Jira, Bamboo, Bitbucket, to have a complete end to end development experience.
  • Easy to use UI/UX for reviewing code changes amongst different team members.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

SonarQube

  • Best thing about it is that it offers an online instance (SonarCloud) where we can dry run an open source project by forking a github repository
  • Provides detailed analysis of the stacks that it checks for bugs and issues in code stacks.
  • Provides a good amount of documentation on how for configuration and installation and how to use it.
  • Provides a strong integration with azure devops and jenkins for creating DSL pipelines.
Arush Soel | TrustRadius Reviewer

Cons

Crucible

  • Crucible notifications of changes or updates to the code review are delayed as well as loading more source code is slow.
  • Crucible is formatting could use improvements for viewing customization features. For instance, allowing the user to create a new tab per file to be reviewed would be nice to have.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

SonarQube

  • SonarQube motivates us to get a big team to write these endless tests to cover everything.
  • Integration with Jira and Jenkins has some tricky moments.
  • Setup process could take a lot of time.
  • Sometimes check rules could be very strict, like 'too many parameters in constructor.'
Aleksei Jegorov | TrustRadius Reviewer

Support Rating

Crucible

Crucible 8.8
Based on 3 answers
Good support overall being an Atlassian product, with options including free/paid official support and community provided help.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

SonarQube

SonarQube 9.0
Based on 2 answers
We we easily able to integrate the SonarQube steps into our TFS process via the Microsoft Marektplace, we didn't have the need to call SonarQube support. We've used their online documentation and community forum if we ran into any issues.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Alternatives Considered

Crucible

Crucible was first on the market and the price is inexpensive. Crucible integrates with Jira Software and Atlassian Fisheye, providing the ability to track defects efficiently. SonarQube compares code to 'best standards' but not 'internal standards' and does not integrate to issue tracking. GitHub offers effective peer review, and has some integration with GitHub issues but costs more.
Craig Solinski | TrustRadius Reviewer

SonarQube

SonarQube is an open-source. It's a scalable product. The costs for this application, for the kind of job it does, are pretty descent. Pipeline scan is more secured in SonarQube. Its a very good tool and its support multiple languages. Its main core competency is of static code analysis and that is why SonarQube exists and it does it exceedingly well. The quality of scan on code convention, best practices, coding standards, unit test coverage etc makes them one of the best competent tool in the market
Debobrata Bose | TrustRadius Reviewer

Return on Investment

Crucible

  • It has had a large ROI for our team, as it has helped us find issues sooner than we would have had we not reviewed things properly.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

SonarQube

  • Our client is quite pleased with the demonstration of this tools
  • Our organisation is using a community edition right now but is planning to migrate to a enterprise version to use it commercially.
  • It is quite a costly tool but our organisation is willing to buy it for its enhanced features and security
Arush Soel | TrustRadius Reviewer

Pricing Details

Crucible

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Crucible Editions & Modules

Additional Pricing Details

SonarQube

General

Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Entry-level set up fee?
No

SonarQube Editions & Modules

Edition
CommunityFree
Developer EDITIONStarts at $1502
Enterprise EDITIONStarts at $20,0003
Data Center EDITIONStarts at $130,0004
  1. 100,000 Lines of Code
  2. 1 Million Lines of Code
  3. 20 Million Lines of Code
Additional Pricing Details

Add comparison