TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cube

    Score9.9 out of 10
    N/ACube is a financial planning & analysis (FP&A) platform that aims to enable finance teams to be more strategic and positively contribute to company growth activities by spending less time on manual, repetitive task, from Cube Planning headquartered in New York.N/A

    GTreasury

    Score8.4 out of 10
    N/AGTreasury offers their treasury management system for funds and transfer management, liquidity tracking, customizable accounting rules with ERP integration, and other liquidity management features.N/A
    Pricing
    CubeGTreasury
    Editions & Modules
    Enterprise
    Contact us
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CubeGTreasury
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    CubeGTreasury
    Considered Both Products
    Cube Planning, Inc
    No answer on this topic
    GTreasury
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    97%
    Would buy again
    56 Answers
    80%
    Would buy again
    8 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    52 Answers
    88%
    Delivers good value for the price
    7 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    93%
    Happy with the feature set
    54 Answers
    70%
    Happy with the feature set
    7 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    96%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    43 Answers
    40%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    2 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    94%
    Implementation went as expected
    47 Answers
    57%
    Implementation went as expected
    4 Answers
    Features
    CubeGTreasury
    BI Standard Reporting
    Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Cube and GTreasury
    Feature
    Cube
    7.5
    21 Ratings
    0% below category average
    GTreasury
    -
    Ratings
    Pixel Perfect reports8.96 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customizable dashboards6.418 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report Formatting Templates7.318 Ratings00 Ratings
    Ad-hoc Reporting
    Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Cube and GTreasury
    Feature
    Cube
    8.9
    47 Ratings
    14% above category average
    GTreasury
    -
    Ratings
    Drill-down analysis9.646 Ratings00 Ratings
    Formatting capabilities8.435 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration with R or other statistical packages8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report sharing and collaboration9.828 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report Output and Scheduling
    Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Cube and GTreasury
    Feature
    Cube
    8.4
    21 Ratings
    6% above category average
    GTreasury
    -
    Ratings
    Publish to Web8.211 Ratings00 Ratings
    Publish to PDF8.511 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report Versioning8.515 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report Delivery Scheduling8.48 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Discovery and Visualization
    Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Cube and GTreasury
    Feature
    Cube
    8.6
    12 Ratings
    16% above category average
    GTreasury
    -
    Ratings
    Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)7.811 Ratings00 Ratings
    Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization9.18 Ratings00 Ratings
    Predictive Analytics8.87 Ratings00 Ratings
    Pattern Recognition and Data Mining8.84 Ratings00 Ratings
    Access Control and Security
    Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Cube and GTreasury
    Feature
    Cube
    9.3
    40 Ratings
    10% above category average
    GTreasury
    -
    Ratings
    Multi-User Support (named login)9.233 Ratings00 Ratings
    Role-Based Security Model9.530 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)9.231 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report-Level Access Control9.09 Ratings00 Ratings
    Single Sign-On (SSO)9.625 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Capabilities
    Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Cube and GTreasury
    Feature
    Cube
    9.3
    10 Ratings
    24% above category average
    GTreasury
    -
    Ratings
    Responsive Design for Web Access9.79 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Application8.93 Ratings00 Ratings
    Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile9.24 Ratings00 Ratings
    Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
    Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Cube and GTreasury
    Feature
    Cube
    7.5
    54 Ratings
    7% below category average
    GTreasury
    -
    Ratings
    Long-term financial planning6.545 Ratings00 Ratings
    Financial budgeting8.951 Ratings00 Ratings
    Forecasting7.349 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scenario modeling6.644 Ratings00 Ratings
    Management reporting8.351 Ratings00 Ratings
    Consolidation and Close
    Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Cube and GTreasury
    Feature
    Cube
    8.5
    49 Ratings
    9% above category average
    GTreasury
    -
    Ratings
    Financial data consolidation8.944 Ratings00 Ratings
    Journal entries and reports9.623 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multi-currency management7.113 Ratings00 Ratings
    Intercompany Eliminations8.514 Ratings00 Ratings
    Minority Ownership7.09 Ratings00 Ratings
    Local and consolidated reporting10.020 Ratings00 Ratings
    Detailed Audit Trails8.232 Ratings00 Ratings
    Financial Reporting and Compliance
    Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Cube and GTreasury
    Feature
    Cube
    8.2
    54 Ratings
    1% above category average
    GTreasury
    -
    Ratings
    Financial Statement Reporting8.745 Ratings00 Ratings
    Management Reporting7.948 Ratings00 Ratings
    Excel-based Reporting9.249 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated board and financial reporting6.538 Ratings00 Ratings
    XBRL support for regulatory filing8.95 Ratings00 Ratings
    Analytics and Reporting
    Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Cube and GTreasury
    Feature
    Cube
    8.1
    37 Ratings
    7% above category average
    GTreasury
    -
    Ratings
    Personalized dashboards8.030 Ratings00 Ratings
    Color-coded scorecards7.515 Ratings00 Ratings
    KPIs8.128 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cost and profitability analysis8.228 Ratings00 Ratings
    Key Performance Indicator setting7.722 Ratings00 Ratings
    Benchmarking with external data9.211 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration
    Comparison of Integration features of Cube and GTreasury
    Feature
    Cube
    8.9
    46 Ratings
    10% above category average
    GTreasury
    -
    Ratings
    Flat file integration9.035 Ratings00 Ratings
    Excel data integration9.538 Ratings00 Ratings
    Direct links to 3rd-party data sources8.338 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    CubeGTreasury
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Planning Analytics
    Score8.5 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
    Score7.2 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    CubeGTreasury
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.1
    (58 ratings)
    8.4
    (11 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.7
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (9 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    3.0
    (2 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    1.0
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    CubeGTreasury
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Cube Planning, Inc
    1) The budget process. In QBO the budgeting capability is non-existant, unless you like manually typing in every scenario and not being able to budget by class. Cube houses my budget/forecast scenarios & lets me view and analyze by my company's preferred data points; department, GL account, vendor, & sales campaign. I'm able to run monthly budget variance reports and plan for the future with ease. 2) We've begun using Cube to help analyze profitablity by sales job. We've never had such easy access to this type of info in the past, so this is a benefit I can directly attribute to Cube. 3) We're beginning now to use an integration with our payroll software to work on headcount planning and payroll analysis.
    Read full review
    GTreasury
    It is well-suited for providing information about what cash is available and its future outlook of it. It helped us to link the multiple bank accounts that we have globally into one consolidated location. We were then able to ensure that we had the cash required to meet the various business needs that we have.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Cube Planning, Inc
    • Push/pull information across any Google Sheet or Excel workbook.
    • Budget at a much more granular level (by month by account by the department by vendor).
    • Custom mapping to allow for multiple cuts of the same data.
    • Bulk range selection within a workbook.
    Read full review
    GTreasury
    • Reporting automates bank balance view(s) by sending daily email recipients.
    • [It] includes the GL account coding on the funding templates to automate the posting of JEs for that transaction.
    • [It] synergizes bank transactions via a single portal rather than multiple logins for multiple bank platforms.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Cube Planning, Inc
    • Limited to 8 top line dimensions. Although you can bring in as many attributes of data as you want, but I would really like Cube to increase top line dimensions to 10.
    • The ability for cross level interaction within multiples cube would be a major plus once implemented.
    Read full review
    GTreasury
    • [In my opinion, the] reporting functions are not user-friendly and [are] very confusing.
    • [I also believe that the] financial accounting module is also not user-friendly.
    • Operator security - [In my opinion,] the admin is confusing to set up new groups. Some languages in there were either no longer valid or changed. [Also, I believe that you] cannot disable users unless you move them to disable group. [I feel like it's] a bit weird.
    • Customer service support - [I feel it has] gotten better but [I, personally,] hope to see more improvement and timely responses.
    • [I believe] the location of certain functions is confusing as well. [In my experience,] I usually have to go to [the] search bar to search for what I am looking for.
    • FBAR - [I feel this is] also a bit confusing and hard to find. [In my case,] I had to ask where it is located, and [it was] definitely not where I would have expected it to [be]. I would assume it would be under reporting, but it was under [the] library and then maintenance or something.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Cube Planning, Inc
    No answers on this topic
    GTreasury
    [I feel] it's too hard to use and navigate around [and] very difficult to manage/administer. We may keep it because [I feel] we [have] already gone through the pain point and don't want to risk going through that again. Unfortunately, if we keep it, [I believe] it's not because we love it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Cube Planning, Inc
    No answers on this topic
    GTreasury
    Good overall usability for what we have needed. We have not delved into any recent upgrades in modules, so there could be better functionality within the system today that we are not currently leveraging. We plan on doing a refresh in 2022 to see where we might be able to take advantage of the recent offerings within the modules we use today.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Cube Planning, Inc
    No answers on this topic
    GTreasury
    Day-to-day support is very quick and responsive. However, if you need to go the second level it might take longer and you lose the visibility.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Cube Planning, Inc
    No answers on this topic
    GTreasury
    Weekly meetings and updates a plus Set realistic timeline expectations Have a good project manager Make sure everyone is following the same time line and dependencies list Keep track of a future state or out of scope list You may need to change the scope and do a project request form change, that's OK if you determine a key function has been missed Don't be afraid to extend the timeline to make sure through testing has been done prior to going live Document set up decisions, how reports and worksheets work, and why certain user codes are or are not in the positioning reports.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Cube Planning, Inc
    Cube was just a lot easier to use than Vena. We took some time to look at Vena as well and while their product was impressive, our organization was not yet there. We needed something we could implement quickly, and in today's day and age I think that is a very important quality to have. Start up and early stage companies do not have the luxury of implementation teams and massive IT resources so Cube was a huge help.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    GTreasury
    Simple and far more user-friendly than most other TMS applications I have used in the past. Very strong core TMS foundation and functionality. Addressing some of the known issues and shortfalls would go a long way in taking a much bigger market share from some of the other main players in the TMS space. GTreasury was also very competitive on price and cost-effective.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Cube Planning, Inc
    • It has decreased the amount of time it takes to build reports by days
    • I can rest easy knowing the knowledge is accurate and there is no human error
    • I have been able to create more reports than I ever dreamed of with the new time and ease of use
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    GTreasury
    • Very positive ROI allowing us to take our daily cash target down to 1% of total admitted Assts. Prior to GTreasury we were running close to 20%.
    • Reduced bank service cost initially by $300,000+ and annually a minimum of $50,000.
    • Allowed us to maintain and streamline Treasury Staff FTE level, with the ability to train other areas for self service payment research, so the Treasury Analyst can focus on value added analysis tasks.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots