CubeAPM vs. Jenkins
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CubeAPM | Score8.2 out of 10 | N/A | CubeAPM is a full-stack observability platform built on OpenTelemetry that enables engineering teams to monitor services, infrastructure, logs, and metrics from a single pane of glass. Teams can self-host CubeAPM inside their own cloud or on-premises environment, or use it as a managed deployment. It delivers full-stack visibility with smart sampling, alerting, tracing, and unlimited data retention at a flat usage-based price of $0.15 per GB. Many teams face a trade-off in… | $0.15 per month per GB |
Jenkins | Score8.1 out of 10 | N/A | Jenkins is an open source automation server. Jenkins provides hundreds of plugins to support building, deploying and automating any project. As an extensible automation server, Jenkins can be used as a simple CI server or turned into a continuous delivery hub for any project. | N/A |
| CubeAPM | Jenkins | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | CubeAPM follows a transparent & predictable usage-based pricing model starting at $0.15 per GB of data ingested per month. Unlike traditional APM tools that charge by host or agent, CubeAPM pricing scales linearly with data volume—no hidden fees, overages, or lock-ins. Teams can deploy self-hosted or managed versions with unlimited data retention and predictable monthly billing. Enterprise plans include ISO 27001-certified infrastructure, dedicated support, and volume-based discounts. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| CubeAPM | Jenkins | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 87% Would buy again 26 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 27 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 87% Happy with the feature set 26 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 93% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 13 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Implementation went as expected 22 Answers | |
| CubeAPM | Jenkins | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | Apache Maven Score9.1 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Logz.io Score8.3 out of 10 | Apache Maven Score9.1 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | NetBrain Technologies Score8.8 out of 10 | Gradle Build Tool (Open Source) Score9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| CubeAPM | Jenkins | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 6.8 |
| Usability | - | 6.4 |
| Performance | - | 8.9 |
| Support Rating | - | 6.6 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 6.0 |
| CubeAPM | Jenkins | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | CubeAPM Screenshots |








