1. Home
  2. Build Automation Tools
  3. Jenkins Reviews
  4. User Review of Jenkins
Streamlining Development Workflows.
May 22, 2023

Streamlining Development Workflows.

Damon Darling | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Jenkins

The workflow begins with developers submitting pull requests containing their code changes and documentation. Jenkins automatically triggers builds, running unit tests to verify functionality and code analysis tools to assess quality and adherence to standards. Integration testing follows, ensuring seamless component interaction. User acceptance testing occurs in a dedicated environment, allowing stakeholders and users to provide feedback. Jenkins generates reports and notifications throughout the process, keeping stakeholders informed. Finally, upon review and approval, Jenkins handles the deployment to the production environment. This streamlined approach improves efficiency, consistency, and visibility, ensuring high-quality software releases.
  • Automated Builds: Jenkins is configured to monitor the version control system for new pull requests. Once a pull request is created, Jenkins automatically triggers a build process. It checks out the code, compiles it, and performs any necessary build steps specified in the configuration.
  • Unit Testing: Jenkins runs the suite of unit tests defined for the project. These tests verify the functionality of individual components and catch any regressions or errors. If any unit tests fail, Jenkins marks the build as unsuccessful, and the developer is notified to fix the issues.
  • Code Analysis: Jenkins integrates with code analysis tools like SonarQube or Checkstyle. It analyzes the code for quality, adherence to coding standards, and potential bugs or vulnerabilities. The results are reported back to the developer and the product review team for further inspection.
  • User Interface: The Jenkins user interface can be complex and overwhelming for new users. Improving the user experience and making it more intuitive would help streamline the onboarding process and enhance usability for both beginners and experienced users.
  • Configuration Management: Managing and configuring Jenkins can be challenging, especially when dealing with large and complex projects. Simplifying the configuration process and providing more user-friendly options for managing pipelines and jobs would be beneficial.
  • Scalability: As projects grow and the number of builds and jobs increases, Jenkins can experience performance issues and scalability challenges. Optimizing Jenkins for larger-scale deployments and providing better support for distributed builds and parallelization would help address these limitations.
  • Continuous integration.
  • Automated testing.
  • Build and deployment.
  • Reduction in errors after deployment.
  • Improved deployment times.
  • Better build reporting.
Nomad used for deployment with Jenkins build server.

Do you think Jenkins delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Jenkins's feature set?

Yes

Did Jenkins live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of Jenkins go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Jenkins again?

Yes

In a scenario where a small software development team is working on a simple project with minimal codebase and a straightforward deployment process, Jenkins may not be well suited. The overhead and complexity of setting up and maintaining Jenkins could outweigh the benefits of such a small-scale project. Additionally, the learning curve associated with Jenkins, along with its resource-intensive nature, might not be justifiable for a team with limited resources and a shared infrastructure. Alternative lightweight CI/CD solutions that offer streamlined workflows and require minimal configuration may provide a more suitable and efficient choice for small projects with straightforward requirements, focusing on simplicity, speed, and ease of use.