CyberCPR vs. IBM Business Automation Workflow

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CyberCPR
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
CyberCPR is an incident response and case management platform from Logically Secure, operating in both a Software as a Service (Pro-SaaS) and on-site (Enterprise) capacity. The CyberCPR platform enables users to securely respond to, manage and resolve incidents collaboratively and efficiently, to support the risk management, compliance and governance functions of a business or organisation. Operating from offices in Cheltenham and Cardiff in the UK, the CyberCPR platform…N/A
IBM Business Automation Workflow
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
IBM Business Automation Workflow is a solution that helps users automate digital workflows to increase productivity, efficiency and insights — on premises or on cloud.N/A
Pricing
CyberCPRIBM Business Automation Workflow
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CyberCPRIBM Business Automation Workflow
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CyberCPRIBM Business Automation Workflow
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
CyberCPRIBM Business Automation Workflow
Incident Response Platforms
Comparison of Incident Response Platforms features of Product A and Product B
CyberCPR
7.0
1 Ratings
19% below category average
IBM Business Automation Workflow
-
Ratings
Company-wide Incident Reporting9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with Other Security Systems6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Attack Chain Visualization4.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Centralized Dashboard9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
CyberCPR
-
Ratings
IBM Business Automation Workflow
10.0
4 Ratings
20% above category average
Dashboards00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
CyberCPR
-
Ratings
IBM Business Automation Workflow
10.0
4 Ratings
17% above category average
Process designer00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Process simulation00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Business rules engine00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
SOA support00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Process player00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Support for modeling languages00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Form builder00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Model execution00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Collaboration
Comparison of Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
CyberCPR
-
Ratings
IBM Business Automation Workflow
10.0
3 Ratings
21% above category average
Social collaboration tools00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Content Management Capabilties
Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Product A and Product B
CyberCPR
-
Ratings
IBM Business Automation Workflow
10.0
4 Ratings
21% above category average
Content management00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CyberCPRIBM Business Automation Workflow
Small Businesses
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
Score 8.6 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
Score 8.6 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Hoxhunt
Hoxhunt
Score 9.3 out of 10
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CyberCPRIBM Business Automation Workflow
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(8 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(4 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
CyberCPRIBM Business Automation Workflow
Likelihood to Recommend
Logically Secure Ltd
[We use CyberCPR] for investigations on IT that are totally compromised. Using the cloud solution, you can be up and running in minutes with the advantage of being able to access the tool from anywhere on the internet. New users are onboarded quickly and can pick it up fast. It scales well from 3 users to 500 and the server load looks low.
Read full review
IBM
Have your process first on paper Its important to first document the process before venturing into BPMS. It will save a lot of pain and heartaches. A BPM tool is no magic bullet, it merely automates your process. Its upto you to put visibility and tracking on top of it. Provide monitoring so that you get a chance to improve your process continously. BPM is not an application If you are trying to build an application with BPM, chances are that your are alraedy failing. BPM must be a strategic initiative for an organization. Yes, you build Dashboards, Reports and other software in BPMS, however you do it at a process level not at an application level. http://bpmstech.blogspot.com/2011/05/bpm-initiative.html Know the difference between process data and business data http://bpmstech.blogspot.com/2011/05/lombardi-best-practices.html http://bpmstech.blogspot.com/2012/02/bpm-system-architecture.html
Read full review
Pros
Logically Secure Ltd
  • Clean UI
  • Easy to use
  • Fast user onboarding
  • Managed communications well
Read full review
IBM
  • System does a great job normalizing business process and automating order processing tasks. Before TeamWorks, the process was much more manual and more expensive staff ($65k to $70K) were required to manage the process. Since implementing TeamWorks, we need much lower-skilled workers to manage order processing.
  • System ensures that we have consistent data across all systems.
  • Rules engine is really the “company playbook” – it is the heart and soul of how the company works. It handles thousands of orders per day
Read full review
Cons
Logically Secure Ltd
  • API development has been a long time coming
Read full review
IBM
  • The system gets crashed when many instances go into the queue stage. The system even crashes and sometimes restarts automatically when the load on the server increases. We had to develop a separate software for this and maintain the same.
  • We cannot manipulate the data during run time. It is difficult to develop user-interfaces with complex functionality.
  • In order to consume external services that follow HTTP protocol, we need to use IDE for that, and consuming services from IDE takes a lot of time to give a response.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Logically Secure Ltd
No answers on this topic
IBM
This particular decision will be made by other people. Overall IBM BPM is the best BPM engine that I have worked with. It is implemented at our company and IT and business are already somewhat familiar with it. Therefore if asked I will recommend renewal as long as the price is reasonable.
Read full review
Usability
Logically Secure Ltd
No answers on this topic
IBM
• The system is easy enough to use but, by definition, is a complex tool. However, they have done a good job generally balancing tool complexity / capability with usability. When comparing to MS Biz Talk, for example, Biz Talk has less functionality but is actually harder to use.
• Software is very flexible. For somebody with the right technical background, it’s quite easy to write some Java code to overcome any hurdles or make the product do what is needed
Read full review
Support Rating
Logically Secure Ltd
No answers on this topic
IBM
Issues can be raised through tickets and it works based on the priority of the issue. The Support Team response is also good and the solution is provided in a short span of time. In a case where the issue is serious, they try to find out the root cause and provide an alternative for it.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Logically Secure Ltd
No answers on this topic
IBM
• Attended on premise sysadmin training for 4 days, 8 hours per day. Although further follow-up training was available, I never felt the need to go back. Training was very hands-on with real modeling (rather than just following a manual). Very effective.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Logically Secure Ltd
No answers on this topic
IBM
• Very satisfied – not too difficult at all.
• We had a consultant available as part of our contract, but we didn’t really need to use (except for some advice on ActiveDirectory and single sign-on)
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Logically Secure Ltd
It's simpler to use, doesn't cost vast sums (it's about 1/10 of the others looked at). Users like the cleaner UI and it's not complicated
Read full review
IBM
Pega Pega is a comprehensive suite which offers a unique theme of BPM development in the market. A no-coding approach based on rules with inheritance makes Pega a very powerful product. However Pega, falls short on integration centric capabilities and very rigid to customize. On the other hand IBM comes with array of products which suits needs of varying degree. Advanced integration is solved by BPEL Process Server which has support for state based patterns and mediation. Dynamic rules and event management can be solved with WODM, Cloud to on-premise connectivity with Cast Iron, Enterprise gateway and security usecases with DataPower, Social BPM with IBM BPM , WODM, mobify with Worklight. Pega has a little bit of eveything here and there. It solves the dynamic rule management, brings out the flavor of Social BPM and mobility with Antenna ( I guess) and predictive analytics as well in one single suite. There are certain usecases which needs to have a little bit of everything, however this little bits and pieces of functionality when its blows, Pega would have problems to scale. With IBM its a bit nightmare to maintain a variety of technologies, however you can wish to go for one without the other and go for something only when you truly need it. Pega vs IBM Its difficult to pick a winner. In nutshell when you want a full scale BPM with rich integration capabilities go for IBM BPM. On the other hand if you hava mature integration capability already, Pega can yield quick results for you as well. Pega's strength is its methodology. IBM BPM's strength is integration. Actually you can't go wrong with both in terms of implementation. My strong recommendation is to invest time to process analysis and pick a good vendor to support consulting and implementation.
Read full review
Scalability
Logically Secure Ltd
No answers on this topic
IBM
It scales from small team interactions to business processes serving thousands of employees, as well as straight-through-processing needs that go well beyond. Of course, scale is always in the eye of the beholder, but IBM BPM does a good job of giving you all of the hooks, APIs, and data that you need to take on whatever scaling approaches you need to meet the load
Read full review
Return on Investment
Logically Secure Ltd
  • It's low cost means the ROI is higher
  • The security means when needed, its there and ready to be used.
  • The deployment options mean you can choose one to match budget.
Read full review
IBM
  • It has added value to the upper management to give visibility into what is happening at any time in the enterprise.
  • Boosted employee morale because it gives them all the information to work the case/task in a single location.
  • Identifies bottlenecks and improves the turnover.
Read full review
ScreenShots