Data Rover vs. Progress Podio
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data Rover | N/A | N/A | Data Rover is a solution for Infrastructure and Security managers that allows to explore, manage, process and protect data, by simultaneously addressing the two primary needs related to the use of data: Cyber Security and Data Management. Data Rover provides precise information on access privileges to files/folders on corporate storage devices allowing the user to analyse the effective permissions and identify not only who can access data, but also who did what, when, and from where. It… | N/A |
Progress Podio | Score8.8 out of 10 | N/A | Podio is a cloud-based platform for organizing team communication, business processes, and reporting in project management workspaces; also it may be used as a light CRM platform. It enables workflow automation and integrations. It includes a free version and paid packages with additional features. | $14 per month per user |
| Data Rover | Progress Podio | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | A discount is available for annual pricing. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Data Rover | Progress Podio | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 89% Would buy again 8 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 86% Delivers good value for the price 6 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 89% Happy with the feature set 8 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 86% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 6 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 75% Implementation went as expected 6 Answers | |
| Data Rover | Progress Podio | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Professional Services Automation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Data Rover | Progress Podio | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Cyberduck Score8.6 out of 10 | Any.do Score8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Cisco UCS Manager Score8.9 out of 10 | KanbanFlow Score7.3 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Cisco UCS Manager Score8.9 out of 10 | Microsoft To Do Score7.8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Data Rover | Progress Podio | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 2.7 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.1 |
| Usability | - | 8.0 |
| Availability | - | 8.0 |
| Performance | - | 8.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 7.2 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 7.0 |
| Configurability | - | 7.0 |
| Ease of integration | - | 8.0 |
| Product Scalability | - | 10.0 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 8.0 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 7.0 |
| Data Rover | Progress Podio | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots | Data Rover Screenshots |










