DaXtra Parser vs. Affinda Resume Parser

The high volume of resume intake and a need to reduce parsing manpower. Great for basic information such as contact information and to create records in ATS.

Incentivized

Affinda is especially appropriate for larger organisations, like ours with internal CRMs. For those who use a fully fledged cloud-based ATS, Affinda will not meet their needs, as Affinda is just one step in the chain.

• Move basic information into Bullhorn
• Integrate with email

Incentivized

• Quality
• Service
• Price

• The information the parses
• Ability to carry over and read information to complete fields in Bullhorn

Incentivized

• Resume Parser by Affinda is a few seconds slower than the other parsers I used (Part of this may just be due to propagation delay, considering my data center is halfway around the world). Regardless, for my needs, Affinda's accuracy outweighed the extra latency.

Responsive and able to resolve issues quickly.

Incentivized

Quick responsiveness to inquiries. Willingness to customize the product to the customer's needs.

I was assigned this project by our operations manager. We evaluated four competing saas solutions, and after the evaluation we found that [Resume Parser by Affinda] scored best on quality, service and price, and was third best on speed. Wasn’t a hard choice.

• Helped decrease parse time of resume applications from email
• Ease to create ATS records of candidates from job boards

Incentivized

• Time savings and easily gathers data in a useful manner to make decision making better.