TrustRadius

AgileTest by DevSamurai vs. TestComplete

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AgileTest by DevSamurai
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
AgileTest is a test management solution built natively for Jira, designed to streamline test planning, execution, and reporting in agile and DevOps environments. It supports both manual and exploratory testing, offering AI-assisted test case generation, smart test execution tracking, and automated defect summaries. With built-in dashboards and visual reports, AgileTest enables teams to monitor quality trends, track test coverage, and detect bottlenecks early. Its Defect Summary Report…N/A
TestComplete
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
TestComplete is a GUI test automation tool that enables users of all skill levels to test the UI of every desktop, web, and mobile application. TestComplete is best suited for testers, automation engineers, and QA teams in any industry.
$2,256
per license
Pricing
AgileTest by DevSamuraiTestComplete
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Node-Locked Base
2,256
per license
Node-Locked Pro
3,950
per license
Float - Base
5,077
per license
Float - Pro
7,901
per license
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AgileTest by DevSamuraiTestComplete
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details—Pay for only the modules needed. TestComplete Pro includes all three modules: desktop, web, and mobile, at a bundled price point, as well as access to the parallel testing engine, TestExecute. TestComplete has additional add-ons, including TestExecute and the Intelligent Quality Add-On.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AgileTest by DevSamuraiTestComplete
Considered Both Products
AgileTest by DevSamurai

No answer on this topic

TestComplete
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose TestComplete
SonarQube and Visual Studio Test Professional
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose TestComplete
We still use both products in our company, since Postman is mainly used for backend automation and TestComplete for frontend automation. The difference is that via Postman you can easily write tests that send different requests to your server, get the response, and compare them …
JK
Jinuraj Kottackel
Senior Test Enginner
Chose TestComplete
I have evaluated Tricentis Tosca and another product along with TestComplete. TestComplete is much better [and more] user friendly.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose TestComplete
TestComplete stacks up against them in terms of GUI and seamless performance. It records each and every step and action been performed in the application and produces a detailed report in a well-structured manner. It can connect and access seamlessly among various databases …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose TestComplete
For their special field (API & web testing) I choose those products over TestComplete
AP
Atul Patil
Senior Test Engineer
Chose TestComplete
Below are the points why we selected TestComplete 1. Better UI. 2. Plenty of validation cases supports i.e. checkpoints. 3. Multiple scripting languages. 4. Better accuracy and robustness. 5. Good documentation and Video tutorials. 6. Great support team.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose TestComplete
Based on my evaluation regards to the product cost, useability, the TestComplete came first on my selections.
Michal Ignaczak | TrustRadius Reviewer
Michal Ignaczak
Senior Test Software Engineer
Chose TestComplete
TestStand is a much more complex tool than TestComplete and it's for a little bit different solutions I think. For desktop apps I would use the TestComplete, For Mobile / Web -> Python + Behave + Pytest selenium - TestComplete is much overcomplicated and slow! For …
MM
Mohammed Mitha
CTO (Chief Technical Officer)
Chose TestComplete
The major advantage over other tools is the ease of use. A chimp will be able to figure out TestComplete whereas the others require extensive coding knowledge
Chose TestComplete
I know from using other tools in the past years that TestComplete could be more cost-effective, yet still get the job done.
AM
Axel Madode
QA Senior Analyst
Chose TestComplete
TestComplete is more complete than Cypress.io because Cypress.io is only used to complete end-to-end testing for web apps. These two tools are user friendly and easy to use. For the needs of our company, we have chosen TestComplete for the variety of testing applications.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose TestComplete
TestComplete is a robust test automation tool and not for someone who expects to just record and playback. This can be done with [TestComplete], but the strength of the tool is the ability to code complex actions and capturing of objects. The reporting of results is also …
DG
Dale Ganus
Associate Managing Director
Chose TestComplete
It has been almost 5 years since we researched products, but TestComplete gave us the best overall advantage to achieve our goals. So, that is why we chose it.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose TestComplete
It's been a long time so it may not be a fair assessment, but I don't recall IBM's product being as easy to use or have as many features.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose TestComplete
We used before the Coded UI Tests which are in Visual Studio / Azure DevOps, and the tests were impossible to maintain and very very flaky. Then in 2015, we selected TestComplete, as it was clearly the tool with the most feature for desktop UI testing. Selenium was …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose TestComplete
We are using Katalon for web-based applications, mainly because our QA engineers have a strong experience with it. But it does not allow precise item identification in Delphi-based applications and that was a show stopper for us. Having received recommendations for …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose TestComplete
TestComplete was selected after trying multiple product offerings. Initially these product offerings were installed with trail keys, and various factors were weighted and sized based on complexity to install, and ease of use. TestComplete scored higher than any other product …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose TestComplete
TestComplete gives the best option of record and playback. Also, it does not have any problem with object recognition just like Selenium.

Selenium needs more manual efforts in selecting the object properties and utilizing them. Also, Selenium needs a good command of one coding …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose TestComplete
TestComplete stacks up because its UI is easier to use than that of Ranorex Studio.
Ben Fishel-Brown | TrustRadius Reviewer
Ben Fishel-Brown
Test Automation & Security Team Lead
Chose TestComplete
We aren't 100% sure that we will stick with TestComplete for our web-based UI testing for the long haul because Selenium is a bit lighter on the overhead front, but we definitely really like it for testing our standalone applications and utilities. As far as a complete testing …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose TestComplete
We use TestExecute together with TestComplete. The ease of use is one of the reasons we have stuck with it for years now. Developers are satisfied due to the time saved with this tool. If you are still hesitating—don’t. We try to find the replacement, but so far can’t because …
Best Alternatives
AgileTest by DevSamuraiTestComplete
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.4 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 9.2 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.1 out of 10
Enterprises
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 9.2 out of 10
SoapUI Open Source
SoapUI Open Source
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AgileTest by DevSamuraiTestComplete
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.8
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.6
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.7
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AgileTest by DevSamuraiTestComplete
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
Best suited to smaller unit test or tests broken up, couple of forms at a time Not suited - larger regressions test involving multiple systems. - my main regression involving payments has been unsuccessful for the last 3 years despite all working fine separately and while being watched
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • TestComplete is great for working with our non-web applications.
  • TestComplete allows us to interface with our web application in a robust way.
  • Despite the age of our architecture, TestComplete handles the old stuff that's been around a while as well as the newer technology when we are able to implement it.
Ben Fishel-Brown | TrustRadius Reviewer
Ben Fishel-Brown
Test Automation & Security Team Lead
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Would love to see TC be a plugin for Visual Studio. Instead of VBScript or JavaScript, to use C# or VB.NET
  • Easier to set up with iOS. Android is not bad but iOS seems slow and confusing to get up and running
  • Built-in PDF reading support, built in Excel API
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
We have bigger test automation pack using test complete at the same time we also think this is not good performing tool for large number of test automation scripts.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
It is usable when you become accustomed to its quirks. Not using it for two months and then you need to re-learn the quirks for some features (but some quirks are so awful that they will never fade from your memory). So, when using it regularly, it is possible to be quite productive, if no big correction in name mapping is needed.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Some bugs were quickly resolved, but most UX quirks of the tool are just marked "as designed". No follow up for enhancement request.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
If you develop a mobile application and your testing process goes in cloud, probably you will face a problem - how to implement a stable connection between your mobile devices and testing servers
Yury Vakhatov | TrustRadius Reviewer
Yury Vakhatov
Test Automation Engineer
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
TestComplete stacks up against them in terms of GUI and seamless performance. It records each and every step and action been performed in the application and produces a detailed report in a well-structured manner. It can connect and access seamlessly among various databases directly to speed up the testing process.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Improved product quality overall, since automating tedious tests frees up time and is not prone to fatigue
  • When getting started - depending on the complexity of the software/UI tested - it can be a time sink before it brings actual value, and changes to the structure of the UI need to be communicated early, so the changes can be implemented on time to run the automation
  • Once set up, the maintenance cost is low, and the automation frees up a lot of resources especially in an agile environment where there are a lot of releases that would need regression tests.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots