Digital.ai TeamForge vs. Microsoft Viva Engage

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Digital.ai TeamForge
Score 7.0 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Digital.ai (formerly CollabNet) aims to help enterprises and government organizations deliver high-quality software at speed with TeamForge, its application lifecycle management suite. According to the vendor, Digital.ai offers innovative solutions, provides consulting and Agile training services, supports more than 10,000 customers with 6 million users in 100 countries, and has been recognized for 13 consecutive years as SD Times 100 “Best in Show” winner in the…N/A
Microsoft Viva Engage
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Viva Engage, formerly Yammer, is used for private communication within organizations or between organizational members and pre-designated groups.
$24
per year per user
Pricing
Digital.ai TeamForgeMicrosoft Viva Engage
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Microsoft Viva Employee Communications and Communities
$24
per year per user
Microsoft Viva Suite
$144
per year per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Digital.ai TeamForgeMicrosoft Viva Engage
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsMicrosoft Viva Engage is also available in some Microsoft 365 packages.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Digital.ai TeamForgeMicrosoft Viva Engage
Considered Both Products
Digital.ai TeamForge
Chose Digital.ai TeamForge
CollabNet TeamForge is superior to Mercury mainly because it has a subversion change management tool integrated with the product. CollabNet TeamForge offers more complexity but with more flexibility for managing and tracking projects. I think CollabNet TeamForge is more …
Microsoft Viva Engage
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
They are pretty much the same, and both have the same function. Via engage, however, is more focused on just the organization or company. With LinkedIn, it is focused on all other organizations as well. But overall, the use and purpose of both tools were the same, and nothing …
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
SAP Build, SAP Business Technology Platform and SAP Datasphere
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
My organization has both Teams & Microsoft Yammer. They use Microsoft Yammer for a larger group as a social media tool for the whole organization, more like a one-way communication from the organization towards a large group of employees. However, I think teams is more suitable …
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
Atlassian Confluence
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
I like how Yammer has functions that are fun and interactive, which can give you much more to do than using Teams or even Microsoft Forms. Yammer helps people feel included and gives people a better sense of how their friends and co-workers are feeling on certain issues. Yammer …
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
Yammer is very rudimentary as a broadcast tool and team notification. I has been surpassed in functionality and usefulness by all the other apps listed.
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
Yammer is better-suited than MS Teams for quick, informal texts with my colleagues.
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
Skype for business might be great for small meetings but yammer is way better for communication and discussion groups.
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
I would say Yammer stacks up to Jabber pretty similarly, except with yammer we have the ability to create more of a collaborate platform. We love Jabber, but we use that more for direct instant messaging, whereas Yammer brings us all together in a larger group (it’s been great …
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
Yammer's biggest competition is definitely Workplace by Facebook. Both provide a "post, like, share" social network experience adapted to an enterprise paradigm. Both provide real-time chat on top of that to drive collaboration. Both have lightweight content management to …
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
We now use Microsoft Teams for chatting and project communication and it is more effective than Yammer. I do not find a use for Yammer any longer.
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
Salesforce Chatter was the initial product we tested as we already use Salesforce throughout the organization. We thought it would be a natural fit. However, we found it was difficult to keep the many groups, thoughts and ideas separate in Chatter, with many of our topics …
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
Slack, similar features.
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
We used Share Point currently and in the past would post things there, Yammer is a little better because people are used to seeing a feed scroll and Share Point did get ignored after a while. PostS tend to get stale there quicker since the format is not as appealing.
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
There are few good alternatives to Microsoft Yammer that serve up the same functionality and allow for networking to the same extent. Prior to Yammer, we used an internal tool which was clunky and did not meet our companies needs. Yammer has proven to be much more successful …
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
Salesforce Chatter and Yammer can often be used in very similar ways. Both offer the ability to collaborate with team-members in real-time. Furthermore, both tools offer ability to share, comment, and network across organizations. One issue with Yammer is that it feels a bit …
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
Each app serves a different purpose even though there may be some overlap. Yammer is a little like Facebook and one can create, join, or find communities, and many people are familiar with Facebook. Slack works with channels and there are some people who are not as familiar …
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
Yammer created very important and reliable social network across the whole company. We used to have MS SharePoint, but since Yammer became available via Office 365 we moved to Yammer.

IBM Connections is difficult to maintain + costs are higher.
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
Yammer is a comprehensive program with enough tools to meet the responsibilities of the company, because it is easier to use and offers more creative and innovative work tools.

The company decided to select Yammer over other programs because Yammer is safer and more prestigious …
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
Yammer seemed like a lite powered Slack that was just coming into its prime. Still a ways to go, but integration with Office365 was great.
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
IBM Connections has a more mature set of features however it is expensive and difficult to maintain. Traditionally IBM Connections require an on-premise installation which required a large capital investment and an ongoing level of expertise to maintain. Although now IBM offers …
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
Basically, all these applications have the same functions, to share jobs and projects in real time and have functioned very similar to social networks that are used daily such as Facebook, Instagram, and others. Yammer was chosen because it is very easy to use, fast and safe.
Features
Digital.ai TeamForgeMicrosoft Viva Engage
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Digital.ai TeamForge
-
Ratings
Microsoft Viva Engage
8.5
Ratings
9% above category average
Task Management00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Gantt Charts00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Workflow Automation00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Search00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Visual planning tools00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Digital.ai TeamForge
-
Ratings
Microsoft Viva Engage
8.6
Ratings
7% above category average
Chat00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Notifications00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Discussions00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Surveys00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Digital.ai TeamForge
-
Ratings
Microsoft Viva Engage
8.9
Ratings
10% above category average
Versioning00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Video files00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Audio files00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Document collaboration00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Access control00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Advanced security features00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Device sync00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Digital.ai TeamForgeMicrosoft Viva Engage
Small Businesses
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Digital.ai TeamForgeMicrosoft Viva Engage
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Digital.ai TeamForgeMicrosoft Viva Engage
Likelihood to Recommend
As long as you are looking for a tool that segregates who can do what with a given repository and branch in GIT, and do not mind strictly using TeamForge's Agile tracking software that comes native to the application, this is the tool for you. The tool is fairly user-friendly, and they have an excellent support staff. You're really buying that support, more than anything else. If however, your company insists on using separated agile tracking software such as Version One, I would not recommend TeamForge. They prefer an all or nothing kind of deal.
Read full review
Yammer provides a social network experience for the enterprise, providing a "Facebook for work". Its mobile app provides an excellent user experience, showing the full mix of communications happening across topics and teams. The web app, while it hasn't evolved much in the last few years, provides a good experience consuming news. Personally, I use Yammer every morning to see what's happening across my company and comment, like, and share to interact across silos. As long as the size of the network inside of Yammer is managed - likely partitioning a large organization into business units, etc., - then Yammer provides an excellent platform for social news and "bottom up" collaboration across teams. Its free-form posting style, including articles and polls for interactive content, helps break down silos across the organization. Contrasted with the boring world of email, Yammer is a tantalizing world of pictures, GIFs, and videos. At LiveTiles, we share company and team news via Yammer, enabling others to see the progress and milestones - from a new office to a new customer - without the heavy burden of a company newsletter or similarly curated content. Even though we have fully adopted Teams for day-to-day, intra-team communication, Yammer is still the gold standard for inter-team communication.
Read full review
Pros
  • Code security.
  • Code migration.
  • Agile tie-in.
Read full review
  • No one likes getting a long thread of reply-alls. With Yammer announcements and updates can be shared — without cluttering your inbox.
  • Yammer's mobile apps are great for our on-the-go sales team to stay in touch with our office staff.
  • Yammer's social aspect makes it incredibly easy to use, even for our less tech savvy teammates. If you've used Facebook, learning Yammer will be a cinch.
Read full review
Cons
  • I would like to see personalization for managing artifacts, that is, allowing the user to customize pages and save personalized settings and then save them as bookmarks.
  • I would like an improved subversion browser such as a graphical user interface rather than a basic file explorer.
  • I would like built in features for CollabNet TeamForge integrated with subversion so that i can associate my private code branches and code changes.
Read full review
  • While Yammer has been an easy transition from SharePoint, it's still relatively new and unknown. Some employees claim that feel like the product was just another "add on" to the entire Microsoft Office experience.
  • When introducing new employees to Yammer, they are not as receptive because of how widely used SharePoint is across businesses and industries.
  • Functionality is simple, but still vastly different from SharePoint, thus creating a learning curve.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Microsoft is dedicated to continual improvement on Yammer. They realize the value that Yammer brings to the table with their clients. In the short time that we have had Yammer implemented, we are just now beginning to see the strong impact it has on becoming more effective and efficient around collaboration.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Overall easy to use and intuitive, although limited in the possibility to personalize layout and look & feel of a site. Some functionalities are not easy to use, like document editing, but some others are quick and effective (posts and tagging above all). Performance and responsiveness of the Yammer site is typically acceptable, in my experience.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Very available
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
It's a simple product but it does provide value.
Read full review
Support Rating
They always answer the phone when we put a call in, any time. They have consistently sent out contractors when needed and were there every step of the way when we switched over from ClearCase to TeamForge years ago. The support is what you really pay for when you buy into TeamForge.
Read full review
We have never had to use the support for Yammer. The tool works well and we have not come across any bugs. User Interface is simple and easy to use, similar to other forum type products, thereby removing the need for any extensive training. Team members are invited in and immediately are able to start using the tool.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
The training that Microsoft provides is very generic training for Yammer. I like the fact the training is short and easy to understand
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
We organically implemented the product
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
CollabNet TeamForge is superior to Mercury mainly because it has a subversion change management tool integrated with the product. CollabNet TeamForge offers more complexity but with more flexibility for managing and tracking projects. I think
CollabNet TeamForge is more comprehensive than either Mercury and JIRA. They're all user friendly tools with short learning curves but CollabNet TeamForge is most efficient in my experience.
JIRA was recently adopted for particular applications and is currently being evaluated by various technology teams.
Read full review
I like how Yammer has functions that are fun and interactive, which can give you much more to do than using Teams or even Microsoft Forms. Yammer helps people feel included and gives people a better sense of how their friends and co-workers are feeling on certain issues. Yammer is a lot more like a social media platform than a work tool even!
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • CollabNet TeamForge has had a positive impact on the efficiency and productivity of managing and completing projects from specifications to software enhancements and from production issues/defects to bug fixes.
  • As a developer, CollabNet TeamForge allows me to focus more on delivering projects accurately and timely while maintaining communications with the business.
  • CollabNet TeamForge Is an efficiency life-cycle management product that helps my team meet business objectives by quickly delivering quality software, documenting projects in a smart and organized way and updating project status to senior management.
  • CollabNet TeamForge Subversion meets developers needs for change management and improves overall software development process in all phases of software lifecycle.
Read full review
  • Nothing negative. But what we tend to forget is that Yammer is just a product, not a vision for change. The true and deep implementation and adoption of an enterprise network needs work and commitment, just like everything else. The true benefits will only emerge over time.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Digital.ai TeamForge Screenshots

Screenshot of TeamForge OverviewScreenshot of TeamForge Reporting DashboardScreenshot of Chef Deployment TraceabilityScreenshot of Defects Trend Report