Digital.ai (formerly CollabNet) aims to help enterprises and government organizations deliver high-quality software at speed with TeamForge, its application lifecycle management suite. According to the vendor, Digital.ai offers innovative solutions, provides consulting and Agile training services, supports more than 10,000 customers with 6 million users in 100 countries, and has been recognized for 13 consecutive years as SD Times 100 “Best in Show” winner in the…
N/A
Sage 300
Score6.8 out of 10
N/A
Sage 300 (formerly Sage 300 ERP) is a business management solution that includes strong accounting and financials, as well as multi-currency and multi-language capabilities. Built on accounting best practices, users will be able to track, control, and plan the financial health of their business.
$1,655
Lifetime License per Seat
Pricing
Digital.ai TeamForge
Sage 300
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Sage 300 ERP Standard
$1,655
Lifetime License per Seat
Sage 300 ERP Advanced
$1,665
Lifetime License per Seat
Sage 300 ERP Premium
$1,665
Lifetime License (unlimited seats)
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Digital.ai TeamForge
Sage 300
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Our pricing is by module and by license and can range depending on what the customers requirements are. Most of our financial and operational modules are $1655.00 each, plus user license, plus an annual business care of 24%.
More Pricing Information
Features
Digital.ai TeamForge
Sage 300
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Digital.ai TeamForge and Sage 300
Feature
Digital.ai TeamForge
-
Ratings
Sage 300
9.3
11 Ratings
21% above category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
9.411 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
9.46 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
9.311 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
00 Ratings
9.39 Ratings
Reimbursement management
00 Ratings
9.38 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Digital.ai TeamForge and Sage 300
Feature
Digital.ai TeamForge
-
Ratings
Sage 300
6.2
11 Ratings
20% below category average
API for custom integration
00 Ratings
9.39 Ratings
Plug-ins
00 Ratings
3.010 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Digital.ai TeamForge and Sage 300
Feature
Digital.ai TeamForge
-
Ratings
Sage 300
9.5
18 Ratings
15% above category average
Single sign-on capability
00 Ratings
9.514 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
9.518 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Digital.ai TeamForge and Sage 300
Feature
Digital.ai TeamForge
-
Ratings
Sage 300
9.3
20 Ratings
17% above category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
9.39 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
9.320 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
9.318 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Digital.ai TeamForge and Sage 300
Feature
Digital.ai TeamForge
-
Ratings
Sage 300
7.1
21 Ratings
7% below category average
Accounts payable
00 Ratings
9.521 Ratings
Accounts receivable
00 Ratings
9.520 Ratings
Cash management
00 Ratings
9.313 Ratings
Bank reconciliation
00 Ratings
6.620 Ratings
Expense management
00 Ratings
9.312 Ratings
Time tracking
00 Ratings
1.05 Ratings
Fixed asset management
00 Ratings
3.06 Ratings
Multi-currency support
00 Ratings
1.010 Ratings
Multi-division support
00 Ratings
9.510 Ratings
Regulations compliance
00 Ratings
9.39 Ratings
Electronic tax filing
00 Ratings
4.07 Ratings
Self-service portal
00 Ratings
1.07 Ratings
Global Financial Support
00 Ratings
9.34 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
00 Ratings
9.35 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting
00 Ratings
9.47 Ratings
Localizations
00 Ratings
1.04 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
00 Ratings
9.59 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting
00 Ratings
9.36 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
00 Ratings
9.37 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework
00 Ratings
9.35 Ratings
Standardized Processes
00 Ratings
9.37 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Digital.ai TeamForge and Sage 300
Feature
Digital.ai TeamForge
-
Ratings
Sage 300
5.2
13 Ratings
33% below category average
Inventory tracking
00 Ratings
1.012 Ratings
Automatic reordering
00 Ratings
9.37 Ratings
Location management
00 Ratings
9.311 Ratings
Manufacturing module
00 Ratings
1.07 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Digital.ai TeamForge and Sage 300
Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)
CollabNet TeamForge is more well-suited for technically knowledgeable users such as developers, systems analysts, QA but not for non-technical users due to the technical data used throughout the tool. CollabNet TeamForge is appropriate for most applications development. In any industry especially suited for high demand software delivery environments.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Sage 300cloud is a great option when it comes to cloud accounting/tracking software. In comparison to Sage's other products, Sage 300cloud is the only cloud/web based option with modern UI's and more intuitive interfaces. Additionally, Sage 300cloud offers an entire system of customer integrations that become available dependent on subscription level. Sage 300cloud also offers integrations between other Sage products (AP, CRM, etc) that allows for better automation and efficiency
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)
I would like to see personalization for managing artifacts, that is, allowing the user to customize pages and save personalized settings and then save them as bookmarks.
I would like an improved subversion browser such as a graphical user interface rather than a basic file explorer.
I would like built in features for CollabNet TeamForge integrated with subversion so that i can associate my private code branches and code changes.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)
No answers on this topic
Sage
It is a solid stable product with a large user community and large ISV community. Support and Training are easy to access and obtain and there is larger reseller channel to ensure the firm you work with is honest. It is scalable and there are multiple deployment and payment options.
Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)
No answers on this topic
Sage
Sage 300cloud is intuitive and user friendly after some training. It does require implementation and training but once that's done, this software is easy to use and navigate. Support for Sage 300cloud is spot on and offers assistance over the simplest to [the] most complex of tasks. Finding information or learning new tasks within Sage 300cloud is relatively easy and educational.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)
They always answer the phone when we put a call in, any time. They have consistently sent out contractors when needed and were there every step of the way when we switched over from ClearCase to TeamForge years ago. The support is what you really pay for when you buy into TeamForge.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Turnover is high in the Sage Support department so sometimes it is difficult to get a rep who knows the issue well. Reps are good and getting assistance when they need it. Sometimes support is more interested in closing issue than actually solving problem. It can be difficult at times to have issues escalated but overall the support is good.
Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)
CollabNet TeamForge is superior to Mercury mainly because it has a subversion change management tool integrated with the product. CollabNet TeamForge offers more complexity but with more flexibility for managing and tracking projects. I think CollabNet TeamForge is more comprehensive than either Mercury and JIRA. They're all user friendly tools with short learning curves but CollabNet TeamForge is most efficient in my experience. JIRA was recently adopted for particular applications and is currently being evaluated by various technology teams.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Sage 300 cloud is much more detailed than the other. About the same in being user friendly A better layout Saves time for doing the schedules for Audits Mobile Access Sage 300cloud can manage all different industries
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info