DX Application Performance Management

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
DX Application Performance Management	Score 9.0 out of 10	N/A	DX Application Performance Management (formerly CA APM, or CA Application Performance Management) is an application performance management platform designed to correlate and analyze data in real-time. DX APM supports hybrid environments and customizable failure thresholds.	N/A

Pricing

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
DX Application Performance Management
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	DX Application Performance Management
Considered Both Products	DX Application Performance Management Verified User Technician Chose DX Application Performance Management We only have 1 application using DX APM, while most of other applications are instrumented using Dynatrace. Dynatrace provides a better monitoring and instrumentation for applications. The required effort to setup monitoring capability using DX APM is way more work compared … Incentivized Helpful? Daniel Garrett Senior Performance Engineer Chose DX Application Performance Management DX Application Performance Management can never compete with Dynatrace, New Relic, or AppDynamics. DX Application Performance Management was selected as a preferred vendor not on actual requirements, use cases, or effectiveness. You would be better using a log search tool or no … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Project Manager Chose DX Application Performance Management We used Dynatrace for years and got very little value out of the product. The sales staff sold the product and disappeared and the technical staff provided little value to actually help us get value from the product. We moved to CA because it was less expensive and met our … Incentivized Helpful? Mayank Thirani Research Assistant Chose DX Application Performance Management CA Application Performance Management (APM) is the solution global brands trust to proactively identify and resolve performance and availability issues across physical, virtual, cloud, and mobile applications. CA APM is easy, proactive, intelligent and collaborative, so every … Incentivized Helpful? Jayson E. Conry Lead Monitoring Engineer Chose DX Application Performance Management App Dynamics seems to be far easier to instrument and has little overhead for additional configurations. While Team Center is a nice addition to the overall APM process. I feel it needs to be more streamlined in how to implement and configure. Not having a universal console for … Incentivized Helpful?
Top Pros	Pro Application server Pro Real time Pro Database server
Top Cons	Minus Set up Minus Learning curve Minus User experience

Features

DX Application Performance Management

Application Performance Management

Comparison of Application Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
	DX Application Performance Management 3.7 6 Ratings 69% below category average
Application monitoring	3.26 Ratings
Database monitoring	3.24 Ratings
Threshold alerts	3.26 Ratings
Predictive capabilities	4.04 Ratings
Application performance management console	3.26 Ratings
Collaboration tools	4.03 Ratings
Out-of-the box templates to monitor applications	4.05 Ratings
Application dependency mapping and thresholding	4.05 Ratings
Virtualization monitoring	4.04 Ratings
Server availability and performance monitoring	3.24 Ratings
Server usage monitoring and capacity forecasting	4.04 Ratings
IT Asset Discovery	4.02 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	DX Application Performance Management
Small Businesses	GitLab Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	ManageEngine Site24x7 Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises	ManageEngine Site24x7 Score 9.7 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	DX Application Performance Management
Likelihood to Recommend	3.2 (6 ratings)
Support Rating	2.5 (2 ratings)

User Testimonials
	DX Application Performance Management
Likelihood to Recommend	Broadcom CA Wily is well suited for monitoring the load balanced application nodes and determine their main performance bottlenecks like if problem exists in heap or in some connection issues. But I think when it comes to providing the entire report of the application, it is less appropriate as there is no way to create the entire report of the test for all the counters monitored. Also there is no way to detect some issues based on the system configuration. Incentivized Mayank Thirani Research Assistant Read full review
Pros	Broadcom Alerting which can be customized by the end user. Visualization of the metrics and data presented to provide a unique and attractive interface. Flexibility to manage actions and commands that we deem important for each application. The ability to define these and customize the metrics reported for each individual application is huge for us. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	Broadcom We are facing challenges to meet RFP requirements in few areas where I would recommend CA to improve. We are facing challenges for non (java and dotnet application) which CA APM does not support. SAP is another solution where CA APM is not able to address our business requirement. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Support Rating	Broadcom We have never received any support from CA on this product Incentivized Daniel Garrett Senior Performance Engineer Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Broadcom We only have 1 application using DX APM, while most of other applications are instrumented using Dynatrace. Dynatrace provides a better monitoring and instrumentation for applications. The required effort to setup monitoring capability using DX APM is way more work compared to Dynatrace, also the amount of KPIs offered from Dynatrace is more than DX APM. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	Broadcom Introscope is deeply utilized within the organization. However, CEM and Team Center not as much. Those that use one piece don't generally use the others. Partially because of the curve in learning how to use the consoles effectively. reporting is pretty well configured and easy to setup if you know how to use the tools. So this can be easy to use and takes less time to configure for the different groups within the organization. Incentivized Jayson E. Conry Lead Monitoring Engineer Read full review
ScreenShots