DX Application Performance Management vs. meshIQ

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
DX Application Performance Management
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
DX Application Performance Management (formerly CA APM, or CA Application Performance Management) is an application performance management platform designed to correlate and analyze data in real-time. DX APM supports hybrid environments and customizable failure thresholds.N/A
meshIQ
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
meshIQ provides observability and management capabilities for middleware platforms, from modern Kafka-based streaming to legacy messaging technologies such as IBM MQ, across cloud and on-premises environments.N/A
Pricing
DX Application Performance ManagementmeshIQ
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
DX Application Performance ManagementmeshIQ
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
DX Application Performance ManagementmeshIQ
Features
DX Application Performance ManagementmeshIQ
Application Performance Management
Comparison of Application Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
DX Application Performance Management
3.7
6 Ratings
70% below category average
meshIQ
-
Ratings
Application monitoring3.26 Ratings00 Ratings
Database monitoring3.24 Ratings00 Ratings
Threshold alerts3.26 Ratings00 Ratings
Predictive capabilities4.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Application performance management console3.26 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration tools4.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Out-of-the box templates to monitor applications4.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Application dependency mapping and thresholding4.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Virtualization monitoring4.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Server availability and performance monitoring3.24 Ratings00 Ratings
Server usage monitoring and capacity forecasting4.04 Ratings00 Ratings
IT Asset Discovery4.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
DX Application Performance ManagementmeshIQ
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
InfluxDB
InfluxDB
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 9.7 out of 10
Logz.io
Logz.io
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 9.7 out of 10
NetBrain Technologies
NetBrain Technologies
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
DX Application Performance ManagementmeshIQ
Likelihood to Recommend
3.2
(6 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
2.5
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
DX Application Performance ManagementmeshIQ
Likelihood to Recommend
Broadcom
CA Wily is well suited for monitoring the load balanced application nodes and determine their main performance bottlenecks like if problem exists in heap or in some connection issues. But I think when it comes to providing the entire report of the application, it is less appropriate as there is no way to create the entire report of the test for all the counters monitored. Also there is no way to detect some issues based on the system configuration.
Read full review
meshIQ
If you're involved in any business that is related to banking, insurance and lending industry, take the short way and save yourself from thousands of wasted dollars on fraud detection and application management issues, Nastel is my savior and it's the most powerful killer solution to beat the fraud and have a winning application performance management, It's like hiring a mathematics magician with super powers to help businesses get over the delayed amount of time spent on a problem, and the average time to process a claim, reduce errors and most importantly to decrease the number of tickets at the help center for a better and higher customer satisfaction score.
Read full review
Pros
Broadcom
  • Alerting which can be customized by the end user.
  • Visualization of the metrics and data presented to provide a unique and attractive interface.
  • Flexibility to manage actions and commands that we deem important for each application. The ability to define these and customize the metrics reported for each individual application is huge for us.
Read full review
meshIQ
  • Its ability to detect and correct IBM MQ issues before they effect the production.
  • performance trends and statistics in real-time.
  • Rapid and accurate monitoring of Command Servers, Dead Letter Queues, Queue Managers, Qdepth and Listeners.
  • Built-in complex event processing to gain valuable visibility into order fulfillment processes
Read full review
Cons
Broadcom
  • We are facing challenges to meet RFP requirements in few areas where I would recommend CA to improve.
  • We are facing challenges for non (java and dotnet application) which CA APM does not support. SAP is another solution where CA APM is not able to address our business requirement.
Read full review
meshIQ
  • The UI needs a lot of improvements to meet today's standards while keeping the functional part highly performing as it used to be
  • Being unable to run reports through the workgroup security manager is a serious con, I think they need to consider giving it more attention
  • the auto-monitoring feature performance goes low when it's enabled during a heavy workloads, it leads to a lower/heavier performance, but during the latest update I feel it got lighter somehow.
  • They also need to give more attention to the encryption and enhance it with the latest encryption technologies
Read full review
Support Rating
Broadcom
We have never received any support from CA on this product
Read full review
meshIQ
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Broadcom
We only have 1 application using DX APM, while most of other applications are instrumented using Dynatrace. Dynatrace provides a better monitoring and instrumentation for applications. The required effort to setup monitoring capability using DX APM is way more work compared to Dynatrace, also the amount of KPIs offered from Dynatrace is more than DX APM.
Read full review
meshIQ
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Broadcom
  • Introscope is deeply utilized within the organization. However, CEM and Team Center not as much. Those that use one piece don't generally use the others. Partially because of the curve in learning how to use the consoles effectively.
  • reporting is pretty well configured and easy to setup if you know how to use the tools. So this can be easy to use and takes less time to configure for the different groups within the organization.
Read full review
meshIQ
  • A reduction in point of sale abandonment by 70% reflects the change in mindset of customers who are no longer irritated by price anomalies.
  • The company was able to merge many unnecessary servers due to thousands of useless queues it had, resulting in yearly savings of more than $250,000
  • improved efficiency and cost-savings by 80% within the first 2 months
Read full review
ScreenShots