TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

DX Application Performance Management vs. meshIQ

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    DX Application Performance Management

    Score9 out of 10
    N/ADX Application Performance Management (formerly CA APM, or CA Application Performance Management) is an application performance management platform designed to correlate and analyze data in real-time. DX APM supports hybrid environments and customizable failure thresholds.N/A

    meshIQ

    Score8.9 out of 10
    Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
    meshIQ provides observability and management capabilities for middleware platforms, from modern Kafka-based streaming to legacy messaging technologies such as IBM MQ, across cloud and on-premises environments.N/A
    Pricing
    DX Application Performance ManagementmeshIQ
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    DX Application Performance ManagementmeshIQ
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    DX Application Performance ManagementmeshIQ
    Application Performance Management
    Comparison of Application Performance Management features of DX Application Performance Management and meshIQ
    Feature
    DX Application Performance Management
    3.7
    6 Ratings
    72% below category average
    meshIQ
    -
    Ratings
    Application monitoring3.26 Ratings00 Ratings
    Database monitoring3.24 Ratings00 Ratings
    Threshold alerts3.26 Ratings00 Ratings
    Predictive capabilities4.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Application performance management console3.26 Ratings00 Ratings
    Collaboration tools4.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Out-of-the box templates to monitor applications4.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Application dependency mapping and thresholding4.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Virtualization monitoring4.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Server availability and performance monitoring3.24 Ratings00 Ratings
    Server usage monitoring and capacity forecasting4.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    IT Asset Discovery4.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    DX Application Performance ManagementmeshIQ
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    SolarWinds AppOptics
    Score7.6 out of 10
    Logz.io
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Splunk AppDynamics
    Score8.5 out of 10
    NetBrain Technologies
    Score8.8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    DX Application Performance ManagementmeshIQ
    Likelihood to Recommend
    3.2
    (6 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    2.5
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    DX Application Performance ManagementmeshIQ
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Broadcom
    CA Wily is well suited for monitoring the load balanced application nodes and determine their main performance bottlenecks like if problem exists in heap or in some connection issues. But I think when it comes to providing the entire report of the application, it is less appropriate as there is no way to create the entire report of the test for all the counters monitored. Also there is no way to detect some issues based on the system configuration.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    meshIQ
    If you're involved in any business that is related to banking, insurance and lending industry, take the short way and save yourself from thousands of wasted dollars on fraud detection and application management issues, Nastel is my savior and it's the most powerful killer solution to beat the fraud and have a winning application performance management, It's like hiring a mathematics magician with super powers to help businesses get over the delayed amount of time spent on a problem, and the average time to process a claim, reduce errors and most importantly to decrease the number of tickets at the help center for a better and higher customer satisfaction score.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Broadcom
    • Alerting which can be customized by the end user.
    • Visualization of the metrics and data presented to provide a unique and attractive interface.
    • Flexibility to manage actions and commands that we deem important for each application. The ability to define these and customize the metrics reported for each individual application is huge for us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    meshIQ
    • Its ability to detect and correct IBM MQ issues before they effect the production.
    • performance trends and statistics in real-time.
    • Rapid and accurate monitoring of Command Servers, Dead Letter Queues, Queue Managers, Qdepth and Listeners.
    • Built-in complex event processing to gain valuable visibility into order fulfillment processes
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Broadcom
    • We are facing challenges to meet RFP requirements in few areas where I would recommend CA to improve.
    • We are facing challenges for non (java and dotnet application) which CA APM does not support. SAP is another solution where CA APM is not able to address our business requirement.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    meshIQ
    • The UI needs a lot of improvements to meet today's standards while keeping the functional part highly performing as it used to be
    • Being unable to run reports through the workgroup security manager is a serious con, I think they need to consider giving it more attention
    • the auto-monitoring feature performance goes low when it's enabled during a heavy workloads, it leads to a lower/heavier performance, but during the latest update I feel it got lighter somehow.
    • They also need to give more attention to the encryption and enhance it with the latest encryption technologies
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Broadcom
    We have never received any support from CA on this product
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    meshIQ
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Broadcom
    We only have 1 application using DX APM, while most of other applications are instrumented using Dynatrace. Dynatrace provides a better monitoring and instrumentation for applications. The required effort to setup monitoring capability using DX APM is way more work compared to Dynatrace, also the amount of KPIs offered from Dynatrace is more than DX APM.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    meshIQ
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Broadcom
    • Introscope is deeply utilized within the organization. However, CEM and Team Center not as much. Those that use one piece don't generally use the others. Partially because of the curve in learning how to use the consoles effectively.
    • reporting is pretty well configured and easy to setup if you know how to use the tools. So this can be easy to use and takes less time to configure for the different groups within the organization.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    meshIQ
    • A reduction in point of sale abandonment by 70% reflects the change in mindset of customers who are no longer irritated by price anomalies.
    • The company was able to merge many unnecessary servers due to thousands of useless queues it had, resulting in yearly savings of more than $250,000
    • improved efficiency and cost-savings by 80% within the first 2 months
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    meshIQ Screenshots

    Screenshot of meshIQ Apache Active MQ, Artemis, CamelScreenshot of MeshIQ Apache KafkaScreenshot of meshIQ B2B Flow IntelligenceScreenshot of meshIQ Apache Active MQ, Artemis, CamelScreenshot of meshIQ Platform