eMaint CMMS vs. IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
eMaint CMMS
Score 6.7 out of 10
N/A
eMaint offers computerized maintenance management software with features for inventory management, asset management, maintenance scheduling, etc. eMaint is now owned and supported by Fluke Corp since the September 2016 acquisition.
$69
per month per user
IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities (formerly Tririga) is an integrated workplace management system (IWMS) supporting facilities management, real estate portfolio management, space management, and environmental / energy management.N/A
Pricing
eMaint CMMSIBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities
Editions & Modules
Team
$69
per month per user
Professional
$85
per month per user
Enterprise
$120
per month per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
eMaint CMMSIBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
eMaint CMMSIBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities
Best Alternatives
eMaint CMMSIBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

Accruent Lucernex
Accruent Lucernex
Score 7.9 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

Accruent Lucernex
Accruent Lucernex
Score 7.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
eMaint CMMSIBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities
Likelihood to Recommend
6.2
(6 ratings)
10.0
(3 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
5.5
(2 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
eMaint CMMSIBM Maximo Real Estate and Facilities
Likelihood to Recommend
Fluke Corporation
eMaint is well suited to larger facilities with dedicated scheduler/planners. Learning to navigate the database and create reports requires a dedicated resource. Part-time users often forget the process for entering data and navigating the database. In smaller organizations where multiple users enter assets, planned maintenance (PM) tasks and vendors, keeping standardization in the system formatting was difficult.
Read full review
IBM
It is great for organizations who have complex data or large amounts of data. For an organization that has small amounts of data or very simple processes TRIRIGA might be too much. It can handle small data and processes but the costs of implementing and supporting might be greater than the reward that would be provided. It also has a lot of room to grow. You can utilize existing forms and business objects or you can custom build new ones to fit business needs.
Read full review
Pros
Fluke Corporation
  • We like that eMaint is highly configurable. You can customize fields to meet your needs
  • You can store and track documents and photos assigned to your assets
  • You can run custom reports.
  • Great customer service
Read full review
IBM
  • Diverse categories of requests available
  • Ability to be as descriptive as possible without character limit
  • Ease of mass resource assignment for tasks
  • Ease of mass maintenance task/request printing work orders
  • Clean site layout that is easy to navigate
Read full review
Cons
Fluke Corporation
  • Functionality not delivered as promised - on usage of tab.
  • QR code functionality.
  • Friction between implementation team and marketing team that sold this to us.
Read full review
IBM
  • In order to get into the back end and manage spaces, there are too many "clicks" and pop up boxes to get to the area that is needed, which causes delays and confusions.
  • It can be a bit slow when processing requests, pulling up maps.
  • Trigia holds a lot of information, which is good but it could be easier to get to at times.
Read full review
Usability
Fluke Corporation
No answers on this topic
IBM
I give it this rating because it has more than one way to get to most forms but it can be hard to navigate if you don't know the terms TRIRIGA uses. Also being a new developer can bring up issues with not knowing exactly where certain things are found. The documentation doesn't help too much sometimes since the TRIRIGA community is pretty small.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Fluke Corporation
No answers on this topic
IBM
In the almost 7 months I have been working on my current project there has been exactly one unplanned outage. This was in the QA environment during data migration and was caused by a workflow that was circular and self referencing which caused the processing JAVA memory to spike, not resolve and then crash the server.
Read full review
Performance
Fluke Corporation
No answers on this topic
IBM
TRIRIGA does a good job of this, being a server based web application it is like other web based systems so it's not as fast as a client server application or a local system but it is very consistent across locations and for different roles and employees. This does allow consistent use no matter where people are located. It also does a fair job of notifying the user when it is loading with the spinning circle or hour glass. The reports can get fairly complex but native TRIRIGA reports perform well even when they are complex. They can be a little slow if they are fetching 100's of 1000's of rows but this doesn't take more than 10 or so seconds. I have yet to write a native report that takes more than 20 seconds and that 20 second report is getting data from 4 BO's and nets over 130K rows.
Read full review
Support Rating
Fluke Corporation
Customer support was always readily available, even when natural disasters were taking place.
Read full review
IBM
The process does seem to take some time and has to go through a preset escalation process. IBM does a good job of communicating through the process, it just seems to take it's natural course.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Fluke Corporation
No answers on this topic
IBM
Do research on the client processes and determine which modules need to be implemented and in which order they should be implemented in.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Fluke Corporation
eMaint was by far most the most comprehensive and customizable solution we looked at. The eMaint team was also extremely responsive and available during the selection process. The product training and conferences were very helpful for new user orientation and best practice learning. The customizable reports also allowed us to provide data to management in an easy to digest format
Read full review
IBM
Much faster web based program with more category options and ease of mass batch printing.
Read full review
Scalability
Fluke Corporation
No answers on this topic
IBM
TRIRIGA can be split into many servers and is easily scaled over multiple environments. TRIRIGA is also capable of being implemented on multiple operating systems and a wide range of environments with different database management systems. This makes it easy for clients to choose since they can choose vendors they have previous relationships with or are required to use for various reasons.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Fluke Corporation
  • We easily track service events over multiple locations so we are able to save on costs
  • Able to run asset lists for inspections
  • Able to keep up with contracts' renewals and service costs
Read full review
IBM
  • It's a positive and works well with the business.
  • It doesn't "stand out" from competitors but has great potential if updates were establisthed.
  • The pros outweigh the cons when using Tririga.
Read full review
ScreenShots