emPerform vs. Infor Talent Management

How easily the system interfaces with the HRIS system is essential for setup. Unfortunately, the emPerform system doesn't seem to perform as well as we would like. Review setup is cumbersome and time consuming. We like the customized workflow, but would like more abilities to assign reviewers.

Infor Talent Management has been a much better experience with talent acquisition than other platforms. There is much more candidate organization and can accommodate for high candidate volume. Infor Talent Management also does well with the ability to contact multiple candidates at a time within a requisition. I feel Infor can improve greatly by performing actions on multiple reqs or candidates at once. It is time-consuming to navigate through each individual req or candidate profile when you have a high volume.

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info

• Ability to customize workflow.
• Ability for Human Resources to aid managers by making recommendations/edits to comments before employees receive their evaluation.
• Customized security profiles to ensure each stage of the process is administered according to a specific business model.

• Candidate organization
• Internal and external job posts
• Candidate contact during the hiring process

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info

• Layout modifications when employees and managers are in "review" mode. The system would benefit greatly from having everything accessible with only a single click. The current layout requires the reviewer to visit different areas before even reaching the rating area.
• Cloud-based performance management! With the popularity of remote and telework positions, it would be fantastic to offer employees and managers the ability to log in from anywhere and still access the performance management system.
• Ease of use and integration with HRIS systems.

• Accessing employee file/information from an internal application.
• Visibility of correspondence with candidates.
• Being able to perform an action on multiple requisitions at once (such as dispositioning a candidate).

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info

We feel very strongly about moving to a platform that's easier to manage and provides our employees/managers with a faster tool. We like the convenience of cloud-based software.

I used workday at a previous employer for a short time, but the transition of data between platforms was not smooth. We lost a lot of employee data in the transfer and spent most of the time re-entering the information. After the transition, it was fairly user-friendly but not adaptable or as organized as Infor Talent Management.

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info

• Reduction in administrative time by having all of the performance evaluations available through an electronic portal.
• Ability to have quick reporting on the status of evaluations and metrics on suggested training and development plans.

• All of our hires through Infor Talent Management.
• Keeping candidate information for later outreach/sourcing.
• An easy way for candidate contact with templates saves time.

Incentivized

Independently Invited by TrustRadius

A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info